EPTIts still bad.
World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Its still bad. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:07 Oatsmaster wrote: Look at this post by Dirkzor He says that Sloosh made a good post. And somehow twists it into something that is scummy. Why? The post you quoted is about HF btw. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:14 Oatsmaster wrote: Its not opportunistic. Its still bad. Why is it bad? And if it's bad, why is bad = scummy? Oats, you need to not just SAY things, you need to explain things, or you're completely worthless. Atm it sounds like you're clinging to a false read. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Still weird though. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:16 marvellosity wrote: Why is it bad? And if it's bad, why is bad = scummy? Oats, you need to not just SAY things, you need to explain things, or you're completely worthless. Atm it sounds like you're clinging to a false read. I really dont want to quote it pbp but summary of why the case is bad is, He straight up twists what clarity is saying in his first post and also noob claims in the same paragraph. I can tell you now I think it's almost impossible to have a scum read stronger than 60/40 day 1. It's not logical to have a scum read day 1 when there is so little to go off of. Looks like he is trying get ready to back off his Holyflare vote IMO because there is no traction for it. He then criticizes clarity's stance on RNG lynching and a question he had, both which make perfect sense to me and theres nothing to ask there. Risen is reaching for anything to call Clarity scum for and thats totes scummy. Actually marv, yeah that's a very good reason to vote like that. I know you're being sarcastic in the quote, but wouldn't scum marv want to lead a lynch instead of adopting one later? Why does Clarity not see this, but instead immediately drops his pressure on marv? There's no way he has any sort of town read on marv at this point. Does clarity know something I don't? This is just so full of bullshit. Its not scummy to lead a mislynch, leading a lynch isnt alignment indicative at all for marv. So therefore there is nothing for Clarity to see and that again, Risen is making things up to justify a scumread on Clarity. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 Don't you find, usually, that townies have totally rank confirmation bias like this? Normally mafia aren't so ... blatant. Yes/no? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:28 marvellosity wrote: Alright Don't you find, usually, that townies have totally rank confirmation bias like this? Normally mafia aren't so ... blatant. Yes/no? Not really no, I mean assuming Risen is town, he must of seen enough from Holyflare to unvote and so therefore he clearly can detunnel and shit. But man, that case is so bad. Would he have confirmation bias in one case but not the other? I dont agree man. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Do you like what he pointed about slOosh's thing about Clarity? How do you feel about what slOosh wrote about Clarity compared to what Risen did? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I just saw sloosh indirectly defend clarity then 2 posts later vote for him off like 2 posts of wiffle-waffle? Man even I dont 180 that fast. Especially since those posts dont contain Wiffle-waffle. In fact, if Clarity votes for BH today or tmr, barring a 'scumslip' then I will be incredibly surprised. Sloosh needs to explain his clarity vote. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:37 marvellosity wrote: Who's "people"? Check out why I unvoted him, it wasn't that. You and bh I supposed. Although yes, I know that's not why you unvoted him. BH especially, he basically said "because he pointed this out I will not lynch him today" | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:39 Oatsmaster wrote: oh lol. I just saw sloosh indirectly defend clarity then 2 posts later vote for him off like 2 posts of wiffle-waffle? Man even I dont 180 that fast. Especially since those posts dont contain Wiffle-waffle. In fact, if Clarity votes for BH today or tmr, barring a 'scumslip' then I will be incredibly surprised. Sloosh needs to explain his clarity vote. I'm curious how you missed this at the time, and the subsequent 10 times it's been mentioned in the thread?  Just to recap then - who are your suspicions? Dirkzor still scummiest, or? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On October 03 2013 19:42 marvellosity wrote: I'm curious how you missed this at the time, and the subsequent 10 times it's been mentioned in the thread? Just to recap then - who are your suspicions? Dirkzor still scummiest, or? lol probably because I was sleeping then read the thread a bit too fast. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
One last thing - how do you feel about me, given my vote is on you right at this moment? | ||
| ||
