|
On September 15 2013 01:06 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:01 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:57 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:12 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nice extremely useless Post Grack. EXTREMELY. *sigh* Looks like I'm getting myself into the classic game of scum or dumb. *sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch? It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See. OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain. Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so. You need to read the thread. Rayn was the first person to call BH scum and he gave reasoning. I was the second person to call OP scum and I gave my own reasoning. I don't think you were at all the cause for OP being almost lynched, you had little reasoning. Lol so why were there only 2 votes on OP for like more than 12 hours? Dat Ego. You had only one point and I had already used it in my argument for OP being scum earlier. I don't know why people ended up jumping on it, but I don't think it's fair to say it was because of you. I do think think it's likely a scum jumped on this vote at the end of the day and I don't think there's anything that excludes that scum from being you.
So me as scum decides to start up a dead vote because why? Also why did you unvote?
|
On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now.
Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept.
Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town.
|
On September 15 2013 01:15 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:01 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:57 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:38 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
*sigh* look at this extremely constructed post. lol my one liner is too constructed. Talk to me Oats. Tell me why Umasi is scum, all you've said is because he voted for OP and then called you scum. Townies do things like that as well as scum... That is why I'm telling people that if One of BH/Rayn is scum the other is town. Well, BH and Rayn arent even gonna die. So that post was useless. Scum Post useless shit. You scum. Umasi did nothing. Was really easy for him to vote for OP with 0 reasoning. He then called me scum even though he sheeped me for like no reason. Therefore useless/stupid scumreads = to the dude being scum. BH/Rayn aren't even going to to die but I easily could be dead by tomorrow. I agree with you about his vote on OP but your vote on BH was poorly reasoned as well and you also placed it and disappeared. Rayn and I both gave a lot of reasoning for our votes on OP, you/WoS/Umasi did not. Pandain's main target was also a policy lynch, the same Policy lynch as BH's. So why does your reasoning then for BH being scum only apply to BH? Why does it apply to BH then but not Pandain now in light of Pandain's scummy vote switch? It was excellent. BH was playing anti townish. I was the second person to talk about OP and I arguably caused him to be almost lynched. See. OP's post were way more bullshit than Pandain. Also Pandain's vote switch is only scummy if Zealos is scum. Which I dont think so. You need to read the thread. Rayn was the first person to call BH scum and he gave reasoning. I was the second person to call OP scum and I gave my own reasoning. I don't think you were at all the cause for OP being almost lynched, you had little reasoning. Lol so why were there only 2 votes on OP for like more than 12 hours? Dat Ego. You had only one point and I had already used it in my argument for OP being scum earlier. I don't know why people ended up jumping on it, but I don't think it's fair to say it was because of you. I do think think it's likely a scum jumped on this vote at the end of the day and I don't think there's anything that excludes that scum from being you. So me as scum decides to start up a dead vote because why? Also why did you unvote? Once again you aren't reading the posts because I've said this multiple times. I unvoted because I agreed with Pandain at the time and it was weird to me (and still is) that all of the votes were falling in without me even being there to push them. You may like to think you were, but you sure as hell weren't the reason. Blub was town, BH is likely 3rd Party, Kush is likely town just by looking at the votes. You're a replacement, you could have pushed basically any lynch you'd like.
So you unvote because there are a lotta weird votes on OP. However, I wasnt one of those weird votes. I voted way before the rush of umasi and other dudes. So how come Im one of the weird votes?
|
On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:45 Grackaroni wrote:
Also @Oats, You never answered my question about whether you had any reason to think Zealos was town. You act as if it's ridiculous of me to see one player scummily save another (who has done nothing pro-town all game) and jump to the conclusion that Zealos is scum as well. yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum. Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game.
yeah and?
Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird.
|
On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
yeah cause Zealos is town. Like look at his first 5 posts. So town. Like useless people are town. Uh. Yeah cause he would post at least 1 long post in that part if he was scum.
Oh my god. people are town because they are useless? I don't think I can do this anymore. uh. Yeah. Ok. I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now.
well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long.
Thats why I thought he was scum.
How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy.
What the fuck Grack.
|
On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:00 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
uh. Yeah.
Ok.
I cannot differentiate scum from dumb and it pisses me off. Pandain makes a scummy vote switch, but it's ok because he switched off a useless player who he thought was scum. So obviously they are both town. So thats your problem. Ok. Right. Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless.
You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum
Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true.
|
On September 15 2013 01:44 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 01:40 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:10 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
So thats your problem.
Ok. Right.
Pandain did a lot of shit other than the vote switch but thats the only thing you are thinking about? When voting for OP your only point was that he is scum for policy lynching. That's not what I'm thinking about I want to know what you are thinking about. i.e., Why didn't that apply to Pandain then and why doesn't that make you suspicious of Pandain now. Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept. Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless. You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true. i cannot remember who, but somebody had meta reasons showing that Zealos does play this way as scum.
lol. This attitude. So scum.
|
On September 15 2013 02:30 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 02:26 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:44 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:40 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:37 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:24 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 15 2013 01:18 Grackaroni wrote:On September 15 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
Pandain did his policy lynch shit kush after I went and slept.
Im not suspicious of Pandain now because of his actions around the lynch. He was the dude most influential around the lynch, most active. Hes town. Pandain pushed a policy lynch on Kush all game. You just aren't reading the game. yeah and? Look, OP's posts are way different from Pandain. And you arent admitting that. And its really weird. I do agree OP's posts were different from Pandain's and there was much more reasoning for an OP lynch than a Pandain lynch when you came in. It just seemed weird to me that you only gave one point for OP being scum and it equally applied to another player and that you still don't think it applies to Pandain now. I'll accept that it was fine then for you to be suspicious of one player and not another doing the same thing, since Pandain was influential during the lynch and did seem townie. But in light of the scummy vote switch I would think that would be another point in your eyes to Pandain being scum now. well there were other reasons, main one is that OP was being purposely obtuse. and also he didnt do anything else, and his posts were long. Thats why I thought he was scum. How many times do I have to say that I think Zealos is town? that makes pandain's switch not scummy. What the fuck Grack. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't subscribe to the notion that people are town because they are useless. You do subscribe to the notion that useless=scum Which I dont agree with. And which is never ever true. i cannot remember who, but somebody had meta reasons showing that Zealos does play this way as scum. lol. This attitude. So scum. I'm very confident that Pandain/Zealos are scum. I'm doing what I can to try to convince you, but you won't be convinced either because you are scum and defending your buddies or just dumb.
but you're wrong or scum.
|
|
|
Lol reasons. Everyone has reasons.
Scum has reasons. Town has reasons.
Why are you calling having reasons townie? Not having reasons is more townie.
|
On September 15 2013 02:54 Grackaroni wrote:
If I ever play as scum in a game with you I am going be completely useless and give absolutely no reason for anything I do and watch how you respond.
k cool.
You know, thats what all the town dudes say when they are irritated with my foolproof way of reading people.
I guess you're town. Vayne did that another game.
|
On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way
Man. Debears.
Are you ok with lynching Umansi?
|
On September 15 2013 03:20 Papa_Smurf wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2013 03:09 Koshi wrote:On September 15 2013 03:02 Papa_Smurf wrote:
Grack's analysis on Pandains vote on blubb over zealos is very correct and very certainly a lynchable offense.
Lynch someone who you think you can read later over someone you think is scum. And the person you voted for ended up being town, when you said you didn't want to lynch them earlier.
That's very contradictive in a scum oriented way yay Join us in the lynch Zealos/Pandain/OP/SnB train tomorrow! I was thinking zealos as of now. Pandain is certainly possible, but I had him as my strongest town read until Grack pointed his vote out. I have to reexamine him
Im confused why you didnt notice the vote before Grack pointed it out.
|
What the fuck is this gamemmmmmememe.
So bad.
Pandain, why cant SnB get town roleblocked?
|
I dont want to lynch OP, he's cool.
Why does Rayn get townie points for being on OP Pandain? If rayn was scum, OP was a mislynch.
|
On September 15 2013 12:15 Pandain wrote:
I have never been in a game with a town roleblocker, is that a thing now while I've been gone?
There have been town roleblockers in minis.
|
On September 15 2013 12:17 Umasi wrote:
oats, why on earth do you want to keep BH alive?
either there's two survivors or he's clearly lying :|
So why do you think I dont want to kill BH?
|
Ok today's lynch is Papa_Smurf.
|
On September 15 2013 12:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont want to lynch OP, he's cool.
Why does Rayn get townie points for being on OP Pandain? If rayn was scum, OP was a mislynch.
|
Oh yeah cause you think OP is scum.
Sorry for stupid question
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
