EPTAperture Mafia 2: Episode 2 - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
![[image loading]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TltX5DwBl7o/UEulpNr4JuI/AAAAAAAAABI/lPg1R1GUbeM/s1600/bunny.jpg) = Alakaslam. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 05 2013 03:42 Stutters695 wrote: I THINK I MIGHT HAVE A CLUE CUZ THAT SURE LOOKS LIKE A BUNNYDo you know who "bunny" might be referring to? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
I said Hi!Just talk to me and I will pick you up and put you on the outside of the fire. But it did not talk. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 03 2013 05:06 kitaman27 wrote: IMPORTANT POST I am a type Mortician role. I can reveal the role and alignment of dead players and it will also reveal the all actions that VE took and all actions that VE was targeted with. All this information will be revealed publicly. Privately, I will receive the names of all the players that VE targeted/was targeted by, so I can use it as an investigative role to possibly figure out who was responsible for his death. It will also give us insight into whether or not Hassy is being truthful about 2 kp/an unblockable kp was aimed at VE last night since the role also reveals factional kp. If you targeted VE last night, please claim beforehand. If you fail to do so then we will assume that you are guilty when attempting to match actions with names. I'll activate this in a couple of hours. On September 03 2013 07:40 kitaman27 wrote: lol man, this thread sure did die. For the sake of being able to move on, I'll activate the role and sit on the names for a bit more time to give everyone a chance to read. On September 03 2013 10:35 kitaman27 wrote: Only reveals actions, not names. In the event that Hassy was truthful about protecting VE, I was hoping someone would claim visiting VE (the exact same watcher ploy used in GoT -_-) | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Hiro, why does town slam roleblock ShiaoPi? Or, if you think he didn't, why did ShiaoPi get roleblocked and slam claim to have been the blocker? Also yes, stutters, I'm the leader of the cell. If you look at the story I wrote about the talking bunny closely, you should see confirmation of that. To anyone else who may or may not be in the cell right now, please don't say anything. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
If he saw those guys visit, and someone killed kita, then either scum DID frame someone, and alakaslam would make a solid target, or one of them delivered the kill. And even if alakaslam was framed, he's claimed to have visited ShiaoPi and rbed him out of the blue, and ShiaoPi claims the block. You think slam is town, so you think....he rbed Shiao for a reason? Or ... Shiao is scum and alakaslam is lying for fun and Shiao confirms it even though now he knows he's lying and someone knows? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 03 2013 11:02 HiroPro wrote: vayne, from what I can gather from alakaslam, the guy has been worshiping Blazinghand as a god for his entire mafia existence. It's entirely possible that he just threw a fit as town when his idol got killed. On September 04 2013 10:01 HiroPro wrote: You still stand by this stuff? Is this why slam is town?why is it so hard for you to accept the fact that he worships Blazinghand and would do anything in anger if that guy got lynched  consider that carefully, just allow for the possibility of him being town, and read his posts. you'll come to the same conclusion I did. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 06 2013 04:30 Stutters695 wrote: Earlier than I'd like, but that's alright. @Austin: sorry if you didn't want to be revealed but this seemed best for towns wincon. Question though: why did you want to shoot Slam yesterday? Also, why did you choose me to add n1 knowing how transparently I play as town and my general lack of missing crumbs/low activity level. There was no way I would have caught on to the bunny thing without an in thread interaction and I feel like you would have realized that. And just so it's out there and you understand this, sorry if this messes up your plan but I'm not going to be shooting just off of your suggestion unless I believe that kill benefits town. So hopefully your wincon can Shot slam because of a couple reasons, but mainly because of the way the lynch worked out. I caught up on D2 happenings, didn't love slam's D6 usage claim --> hey guys I'll post more sensibly --> ______ routine, but especially because out of all the players he gives us the most information. We know geript and hassy's flips, if we know alakaslam then we can analyze the votes more fully. If all three are town, the votes look a lot different than when one of the 3 options was scum (And didn't end up getting lynched). As far as choosing you to add, I don't often read you correctly, or am always worried that this is the game that you roll scum and have low activity. The full reason is tied into that. We can talk later about the targeting bit. Other dude(s), I need you to shoot given targets. There are reasons. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 06 2013 04:50 Stutters695 wrote: There's a lot of stuff I either don't believe or don't think I have full information on this game. The bell was on that list.So you knew about the bell but wanted to shoot him Didn't know for sure it existed, didn't know whether it was activated or passive, and...I can try to shoot him at night but that's it. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 06 2013 05:19 Stutters695 wrote: Claiming watcher AND claiming a buncha targets sillypants if he's scum. At best...eh, because of the split worlds it COULD be a play to get slam and cheesecake both lynched, saccing himself to a shot or a lynch the next day. But I don't understand why scum would be looking for that trade on two unclaimed dudes, one of whom almost got lynched.Fair enough. Do you trust Onegu's claim? I have a reason to but if you're not in BM you don't know it. Why do you trust him? So given the specificity of the claim, I trust it. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On September 06 2013 10:15 AxleGreaser wrote: Yeah. There are a couple things simmering right now that need some explaining. I'm still interested in Hiro's read on alakaslam and debears returning to thread and engaging in a little more discussion than "nuff said," in addition to Cheesecake's response. I was actually writing that post wrote a whole bunch of questions and thinking in the redacted section... then realised I was sounding out the ground for Cheesecake. Cheescake needs to explain himself in the other thread. I then also realised your post had prompted me to think. I thought it might be good to flag that you ought stop too. | ||
| ||
