|
On August 17 2013 09:49 reps)squishy wrote:I read all pages so far. I am suspicious of iV. He believes in lynch all liers and also stated town has plenty of reasons to lie. Is it me or does that seem a little scummy. Proof. 1. Show nested quote +On August 16 2013 05:04 iVLosK! wrote: Yeah lynch all liars and no lurking! And anything else that sounds pro-town! C'mon guys. No fucking duh. I have a policy of lynching people who say stupid, obvious shit. What do you think of them apples, flare, deus, and LM? 2. Show nested quote +There are plenty of reasons to lie as town. Part of this game is misleading scum about what your own abilities and intentions are. Read it again. You fucked up.
|
On August 17 2013 09:53 reps)squishy wrote: I am sorry I don't see where I "fucked up". Please point it out.
On August 17 2013 09:49 reps)squishy wrote:I read all pages so far. I am suspicious of iV. He believes in lynch all liers and also stated town has plenty of reasons to lie. Is it me or does that seem a little scummy. Proof. 1. Show nested quote +On August 16 2013 05:04 iVLosK! wrote: Yeah lynch all liars and no lurking! And anything else that sounds pro-town! C'mon guys. No fucking duh. I have a policy of lynching people who say stupid, obvious shit. What do you think of them apples, flare, deus, and LM? 2. Show nested quote +There are plenty of reasons to lie as town. Part of this game is misleading scum about what your own abilities and intentions are.
I've bolded the obvious sarcasm for those unable or unwilling to keep up.
|
On August 17 2013 10:01 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 09:54 iVLosK! wrote:On August 17 2013 09:53 reps)squishy wrote: I am sorry I don't see where I "fucked up". Please point it out. On August 17 2013 09:49 reps)squishy wrote:I read all pages so far. I am suspicious of iV. He believes in lynch all liers and also stated town has plenty of reasons to lie. Is it me or does that seem a little scummy. Proof. 1. On August 16 2013 05:04 iVLosK! wrote: Yeah lynch all liars and no lurking! And anything else that sounds pro-town! C'mon guys. No fucking duh. I have a policy of lynching people who say stupid, obvious shit. What do you think of them apples, flare, deus, and LM? 2. There are plenty of reasons to lie as town. Part of this game is misleading scum about what your own abilities and intentions are. I've bolded the obvious sarcasm for those unable or unwilling to keep up. Seems more egotistical than sarcastic. Regardless of what you think of it, It clearly isn't sincere. And as such, has no indication of alignment, Or "hypocrisy", as the popular term seems to be. So either make something of it or don't.
|
Slam, you and I know how to kill a thread.
|
On August 17 2013 10:22 Alakaslam wrote: Well is it really our fault no one is talking? Nah man, it's cool. Wait and see what they come up with in the QT.
|
Mostly a joke. But people attempting to make something of nothing is obvious scum mentality, somebody just trying to find SOMETHING to say and accuse someone. That's why I had to get firm with the two of them (reps and deus) for a second..
|
Chiefs are winning by the way. This is me in a good mood.
|
"You fucked up." And "Make something of it or don't." Off the top of my head.
|
Kansas City, man.
Born, bred, and corn fed.
|
I'm in a good move and I'm from OMGUS. OT is my middle name.
|
Reps telling me he won't tolerate my bullshit and then promptly FO'ing. Duels noted.
|
We in Kansas tend to look at California with a mixture of disdain, pity, and confusion. Even more so outside the city.
|
On August 17 2013 11:20 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 11:08 iVLosK! wrote: We in Kansas tend to look at California with a mixture of disdain, pity, and confusion. Even more so outside the city. Seems they know our politics well. /can't saytoomuch online Yeah. County by county it gets nuts, but it's a great state. Gun in the truck? CA; Huge fine, gotta register all over the place etc. unless you have a good reason, and obey tons of statutes to do it legally when you have said reason AZ: dude laughs at me calls me paranoid enough potassium to destroy an office building? CA; "Move along, move along". AZ: "excuse me. What is the load you're carrying?" ... "I see you are with a fertilizer company. I think you had better tell me what you're carrying son." ..." Ok good. What for?" ... "Ok. ID?" ... "Thank you. Go." And AZ gets a bad rap. Hmm. I think it is just different priorities. So back to mafia: what is who is scum and why isn't anyone else talking? Gun in the truck? Kansas: No reaction because there's a gun in every truck in Kansas.
reps looks like shit for:
EDITING HIS FUCKING POST
On August 17 2013 09:19 reps)squishy wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On August 17 2013 06:51 justanothertownie wrote: I'm around. This one liner is pretty funny. It's like I am not a Lurker ahhh!!! I as far as who we lynch always the most obvious person day1. If you don't have a super obvious person day 1 go lurker. And as the games go on Liars over Lurkers. Some people have alot of IRL stuff going on but if they don't contribute they need to go. As far as Alakaslams videos and iVLosK!'s rap + Show Spoiler +Holla-Holla-Loo-Yuh I am Mafia's big swinging ding-a-ling, make 'em sing. Holla-Holla-Loo-Yuh I am everything you ever were afraid of. Holla-Holla-Loo-Yuh I am Mafia's big swinging ding-a-ling, make 'em sing. Holla-Holla Loo-Yuh Yeah, you rappers bore me, I wanna kill you Do it for me and I'll holla-holla. I do mind it very much. But when it gets repetitive I will not tolerate it. EBWOP: Correction I don't mind it. Also I am not to fond of constant one liners or posts that are not constructive
"I fucking mind you coming in and WASTING the very first post of the game (which was totally going to be filled with more useful scumhunting) with a bomb-ass rap song... EBWOP: Wait, I don't mind. So this post is just filler now."
On August 17 2013 09:49 reps)squishy wrote:I read all pages so far. I am suspicious of iV. He believes in lynch all liers and also stated town has plenty of reasons to lie. Is it me or does that seem a little scummy. Proof. 1. Show nested quote +On August 16 2013 05:04 iVLosK! wrote: Yeah lynch all liars and no lurking! And anything else that sounds pro-town! C'mon guys. No fucking duh. I have a policy of lynching people who say stupid, obvious shit. What do you think of them apples, flare, deus, and LM? 2. Show nested quote +There are plenty of reasons to lie as town. Part of this game is misleading scum about what your own abilities and intentions are.
He's suspicious of me because he caught me contradicting myself. Okay. I, of course, made it clear that the above was plain sarcasm.
On August 17 2013 10:01 reps)squishy wrote: Welp that clears my suspicion of you, Sorry. iVLosK! who do you think is suspicious?
And he's done. He's made his D1 contribution and wants to know what others think now. Reps, you claim to hate one-liners and lurkers, but if you take away your first real post (and you did, with that EBWOP), that's about all that you've done here. As it is, you just moved a step up on my "To lynch" list and Deus is going up there with you for immediately jumping on the first wagon he could find when he had just been talking about pressuring lurkers 15 minutes earlier.
|
I'll reread what Deus said tonight while I'm waiting for trucks to show up at work tomorrow.
|
Didn't realize the joke dealt strictly with border patrol. Mine would be WYCO cops.
Which game is that, boss?
|
On August 17 2013 18:17 reps)squishy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 16:12 LoneMeow wrote: I really need reps)squishy and Squibbles to start participating more and that has to happen right now, otherwise I might have to start driving for lynching one of you. Post your top 2 scum reads with some reasoning, thanks. My Suspicious list. 1. justanothertownie He seems to be posting enough to stay under the radar. Posts like this " I'm around." make the suspicion flair. 2. Squibbles Makes the IRL excuse. Then says he reads the messages all day long but does not post. People I am not suspicious of. DeusX super agressive as a townie last game XLV and is playing somewhat the same. And in your opinion, is Deus playing to this meta he's established?
|
On August 17 2013 18:50 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 18:41 iVLosK! wrote:On August 17 2013 18:17 reps)squishy wrote:On August 17 2013 16:12 LoneMeow wrote: I really need reps)squishy and Squibbles to start participating more and that has to happen right now, otherwise I might have to start driving for lynching one of you. Post your top 2 scum reads with some reasoning, thanks. My Suspicious list. 1. justanothertownie He seems to be posting enough to stay under the radar. Posts like this " I'm around." make the suspicion flair. 2. Squibbles Makes the IRL excuse. Then says he reads the messages all day long but does not post. People I am not suspicious of. DeusX super agressive as a townie last game XLV and is playing somewhat the same. And in your opinion, is Deus playing to this meta he's established? My burning question is, why aren't you playing like you did in XLII? I remember you being far more aggressive and attacking people, now you seem to be content to just drop remarks from the sidelines... Go reread XLII. You're holding me to a D1 meta in a game that lasted several days.
I think deadline is in a few hours, no? Lets see some votes get thrown out and see where people really stand.
|
|
On August 17 2013 23:48 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 23:20 LoneMeow wrote: I'd like to get more reads from almost everyone, please.
My current top scum suspects, in no particular order: Squibbles - is participating in the game, but hasn't really produced any content nor reads iVLosK! - it seems to me that his play is different from last time, but that's weak so I'm prepared to watch him for now reps)squishy - although he finally gave some reads that only happened after being pressured so I'm still suspicious
Had a relatively strong town read on Holyflare, but his useless (and very non-committal) vote on Xzavier makes me a little worried I might be misreading. If he posts at 6.59 he will not be modkilled, hence the placeholder vote, it can be moved anytime I feel like it onto someone more suspicious. It is also madatory to vote for someone otherwise you will also probably be warned/modkilled, if I was to suddenly become inundated with things to do later at least my vote would be on a worthy person. It is more suspicious that people have not voted at all with only 3 hours left to go. This is also a plurality lynch meaning that the person with the most votes, not majority will be voted off. Do you really want to vote off the guy that has at least said something rather than the person that has said nothing? A last second vote from Xzavier would be tantamount to admitting he is scum. If he does, we just lynch him D2. I would much prefer to allow him to be modkilled and we can see what his replacement has to say.
I much prefer reps or sqibbles for the lynch and will vote squibbles because multiple players have stated that reps is always like this.
##Vote: Squibbles
|
I said I spared him on condition of more posts from him and he's posted like once since then. Not exactly a 180 by any stretch of the imagination.
|
|
|
|