EPTTitanic Mini Mafia! - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 17:37 Vivax wrote: It was kinda designed to lure some response from scum thinking they got an easy target. But I need to work on appearing scummy, either that, or scum this game is a team of cravens (thx GoT). You really believe your post had a chance to lure scum? I honestly thought u were just clueless villager, and would wait till you were awake to hopefully address that. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
I like a wagon on paperscraps. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 18:53 hzflank wrote: Most people have now posted and the current discussion is at risk of stagnating. You have already talked about Paper, so unless you have anything to add there would you now be willing to tell us why you found Koshi more scum like than others? I really didn't like his fluff. That's about it. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 09:54 FirmTofu wrote: Yeah, I dunno what you guys are doing fluffing up the thread with fluff and general bullshit but It's be great if we could discuss the game now. Ok, this post is really bothering me now. Wants to get down to business...but also is bogging the game down with the lurker discussion. Like really pushing the discussion from the get-go. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 22:15 Oatsmaster wrote: I dunno about FT, that 'mistake' above seems really newbie scum mistake to make. Clarity, what do you propose I talk about? i would like to know your scum and town reads as you have talked to several people directly so far. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
I don't think both are scum, but I think its a high chance one of the two are. Really strange initial votes on me by both of them. I don't understand why I had to be voted because I didn't provide a reason for a tone read I made. Paperscrap's vote is even more bewildering because he states he was "joking in all his posts." So, if they were townies making these votes I would have to assume they are trying to see if anybody jumps on my bandwagon and gain some information from it....but then they really quickly unvote. Just really strange town play IMO. Really can't see this being done as a scum/scum combo. It draws a little too much attention. Again, could be town/town, but I think its really likely a scum/town combo here. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 22:47 hzflank wrote: How is that post in any way more useful to town than to scum? You think that Paper and Tofu should be the two lynch candidates but do not state which of them is most likely to be scum. If they are both town then having them be the primary lynch candidates would be great for scum. If one of them is actually scum then you posting that without saying which one you think is scum is really not useful, as if one of them flips town you are in a position where you should assume that the other is scum, which give you a really easy excuse to vote for them if you are in fact scum. Basically, telling us which single person you want to lynch is good. Telling us that you want the votes to be between two specific people is really bad. Which of them is most likely to be scum? It's a useful post for those who think I'm town and several people do. it's also useful to have a nice concise argument that one of those two is scum for if/when i die and turn up town. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
I think I've stated who is more likely to be scum by the small case I put on paperscraps and the fact that I voted for him. Why is me advocating the 2 wagons bad? I feel like I will get a lot of useful information regardless of how they turn. My scum lean on paperscraps isn't even that strong...and if he actually was joking then it's a very slight lean. Still, based on their interactions with me and their voting history on Day 1, I firmly believe that one of those two is scum. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
Are you drunk? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 23:27 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: My question to you is, why are you trying to highlight posts that make you look town! It doesn't help us find scum if you take a post and run around screaming "Guys! I'm town! This is why!". No. That will earn you a one way ticket into the ocean. Go find us scum, not sit around and proclaim your innocence. It helps no one. The Kraken is hungry, and I don't think it wants to eat me again. But perhaps it would find you tasty... I'm not trying to highlight posts that me look town. What are you talking about? Pretty sure I haven't sat around and proclaimed my innocence either. Please show me what you are talking about. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 23:35 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: Then why do you not vote for FirmTofu? You just said that you think they are both scum and that you want to vote for them, but you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. So your vote should be clear. Why is it not clear to you then? Are you trolling me? I never said that I think they are both scum. If it was voting deadline right now, I'd vote paper first, and tofu 2nd. I don't think paperscraps is as scumy as FirmTofu. WTF? have you been reading my posts or just making things up in your head. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 23:42 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: You said that you think at least one of them as scum. So that would mean that you are trying to figure out who is scummier? I bolded two sentences in your post which contradict each other. You would rather vote paperscraps first, but you think FirmTofu is scummier. Am I missing something? That statement that you bolded is WHAT YOU WROTE. It's what I'm giving a WTF to. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 23:35 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: Then why do you not vote for FirmTofu? You just said that you think they are both scum and that you want to vote for them, but you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. So your vote should be clear. Why is it not clear to you then? "But you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu." Captain Jack. YOU said this! I don't know where you came up with this idea. I never once stated that I don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. On July 27 2013 23:39 exarezee wrote: Are you trolling me? I never said that I think they are both scum. If it was voting deadline right now, I'd vote paper first, and tofu 2nd. I don't think paperscraps is as scumy as FirmTofu. WTF? have you been reading my posts or just making things up in your head. "I don't think paperscraps is as scumy as FirmTofu. WTF?" This is addressing what YOU said. All I did was change the pronoun from when you were addressing me to me referring to myself. I can't even believe I'm having to post this. This is like arguing 1+1=2. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 27 2013 23:48 hzflank wrote: Because scum want two town wagons on day 1. Town only wants to find one scum as the chance of actually finding multiple scum on day 1 is very slim. If a scum member is under pressure and cannot deal with it alone then the simplest and easiest thing for the scum team to do is to ignore that person and secure two other lynch candidates. If town start saying that we want to lynch two specific people then it makes it too easy for scum to steer us into a mislynch without being noticed. If you think that they are both scum that is fine, but don't do anything resembling pushing for lynches on them both at the same time. You're exactly right. Scum would ideally want two town wagons Day 1. That's why we wagon paper and tofu......you really think they are town/town with their interactions with me day 1? | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
| ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
Tofu attacks me about the lurker talk. I give a scum lean on papers. Tofu votes me because I did not provide a reason for my scum lean on papers. Papers comes back to thread and drops a vote on me. No reason is given. I provide my reason on papers. Tofu unvotes me and casts suspicion on papers now. Papers unvotes me. Papers plays off his posts as jokes. | ||
| ||
