EPTBut leave your vote where it is, all good, but please give us some opinions other than those on oats.
Titanic Mini Mafia! - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
But leave your vote where it is, all good, but please give us some opinions other than those on oats. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Vayne is a pig or swine or something. I think you should all vote Tofu for | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote: Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis. I happen to agree that vayne has done nothing and that before you made that case you had done nothing. So what is left, he nitpicks stuff during the first 12 hours of the game? Please explain why that is scummy. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:07 Oatsmaster wrote: because he takes it and calls 1 part scummy. Like he is trying so desperately to call paper's scum. If you read a filter and you dont think a dude is scum, you dont make a case right? Well justanothertownie decided that he had to call papers scum and capitalize on the current thread view towards him and went through his filter thinking that. So he nitpicked. Nitpicking is bad and scummy because it shows you dont have actual reasons to believe someone is scum. Clarity, who is scum? And dont say vayne, hes town. I'm not buying it, I understand that argument when you cherrypick a 10 page filter but it was like 12 hours into the game or something. Anyway, other than Tofu? I dunno, there's a lot of people who have contributed nothing or the minimum and I'm kinda getting worried this is just gonna be a town on town shitfest. What makes you say vayne is town? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote: my bad. So clarity, ignoring the vote post, what else makes tofu scum? What? Nothing else makes him scum he hasn't done anything else. You're asking silly questions. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote: you're bad or scum. I have already given multiple explanations why FT's vote doesnt make him scum. You havent responded to ANY OF THEM. And since its the only reason you think he is scum, better go and justify your view point. Thought you were talking about my "vote post" Anyway, your answers are still in my case. You're just asking everyone every question you can think of, how is this helping anyone. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
read my fucking case you spammy fuck, my main point wasnt even about his vote post all you're doing is burying decent discussion with your incessant dumbass questions | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
How is anyone supposed to know when you spam the next two pages with one liner questions that have nothing to do with your case and you don't follow up? Your case is also pretty poor | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:31 Oatsmaster wrote: :o But when you read justanothertownies filter, is he scummy? He's no shining beacon of green but I don't think he has a decent chance of flipping red, no. This post seems to indicate he's town: On July 27 2013 22:23 justanothertownie wrote: I don't like the case on Tofu. That doesn't mean he can't be scum but his Filter looks more like town to me. His vote on exarezee doesn't make that much sense to me but I don't think it is scum motivated. I guess he just tried to get exarezee to explain himself. But as you already pointed out: he should defend himself! Your argument with clarity is actually pretty stupid... I see a lot of nitpicking in it. For example I think the discussion whether 7 minutes are enough to read a page of filter ist pointless as it surely depends on the player. I also don't understand why you are so focused on clarity answering you and presenting his case in the same post. Arguments like this won't help town in any way. I am not entirely sure why clarity started this case on Tofu because I can't imagine he really thinks this guy is scum at the moment. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:35 Koshi wrote: How does that look town when you think the opposite? You say that you are scum? Two town players cant have different viewpoints? That post makes no sense from a scum viewpoint, especially the last line. What scum says "I don't think he believes in it himself" | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Saying my case is bad or that FT looks town can be said by both scum and town, saying "I don't think he believes in his own case" seems like a conclusion you can't really get to as scum. Doesn't matter that he's wrong | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
A response to my case on your would also be appreciated | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:46 exarezee wrote: The carefree posts and lack of reading comprehension to make an actual case or a real quote of what i said makes me lean town on oat and captain jack. i'm not sure if oats is clueless and blind or a savante. it's either or and no in between. will wait to make that judgement. i see no reason to move my vote of FT at the moment. I will of course give him a chance to defend himself. But his posts on day 1 are bad. And if it was a joke, it was pretty bad jokes imo. You mean papers, right? that's who your vote is on | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 02:01 hzflank wrote: Too obvious. If scum wanted a messy thread then they would give town reasons to make it messy but they would not do it themselves. Also, Oats' recent posts have made it much easier to get reads on him than his early posts did. I've made this mistake before in a game where I called someone town because he, for like 72 hours, with one scum left in the game, would not stop talking about setup speculation. I thought he couldnt possibly be this obvious so this is just a dumb townie. Turns out he was the last scum. Am I saying oats is scum? Not really.... but he did make the last 2-3 pages a complete clusterfuck which is anti town behavior and if he continues we should lynch or vigi that shit. Oats, you can ask questions and push stuff without making everything around you a slog to read through. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 02:30 FirmTofu wrote: WTF? Bolded and big'd obvious scumslip. How did no one catch this? ? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Like, I guess if you're superscum it's like a mindgame thing, but if that were the case why did he seem so scummy in the first 12 hours. ##Unvote Am actually gonna be gone for a couple of hours but shall return later, look forward to hearing from Malongo. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Koshi, do you have any scumreads at all? Other then saying that JAtownie "looks bad" I don't really see it. And even this accusation of him looking bad is after Oats posted a giant case on him.... On July 28 2013 01:26 Koshi wrote: Let's talk people that look bad atm. justanothertownie Horrible first post. Horrible second post. 3 4 5 6 7 8 You only give your reasons for suspecting him of being scum after you have a townread on him. On July 28 2013 04:41 Koshi wrote: Oh I missed that question earlier. I was wrong about you. I don't think you are scummy anymore. I thought you were scummy because of your first 2 posts. But now it seems more like you didn't had a good feel into this game yet and tried your luck with making 2 cases. I am actually leaning town on you now. Other than this, you've posted your "willing to lynch" lists but they have basically been JAtownie and a bunch of lurkers/non-posters.... and vayne who is trolling. Who do you currently want to lynch? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Could we get a co-host to tell us everything is gonna be okay? | ||
| ||
