EPTAnd then goes on to another topic.
Titanic Mini Mafia! - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
And then goes on to another topic. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Saying my case is bad or that FT looks town can be said by both scum and town, saying "I don't think he believes in his own case" seems like a conclusion you can't really get to as scum. Doesn't matter that he's wrong | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:39 justanothertownie wrote: Way to exaggerate Oats... i said he looks more like town. How could you interpret that as: You make no sense man... nitpicking. Why are you doing this instead of scumhunting? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
You are clutching at straws, but if you are going to do that with this post then it is better to consider whether he is scum who knows that Clarity is town. I considered that for a while, but the result was null. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:40 Clarity_nl wrote: Saying my case is bad or that FT looks town can be said by both scum and town,saying "I don't think he believes in his own case" seems like a conclusion you can't really get to as scum. Doesn't matter that he's wrong I dunno man, I dont agree with that. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:39 exarezee wrote: I'm really lost as to who's trolling. I've been trolled by captain sparrow, oatsmaster, and paper so far. Are you guys all just joking right now or can i take your posts seriously. The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote: The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise. Why you shit on thread. Nice to see you back exarezee, any thoughts at all? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 18:37 exarezee wrote: It's difficult to ascertain tone and sarcasm and some of these less subtle jokes on the internet. I even indicated I thought paperscraps was joking early on. But when posts have 0 use and possibly 0 intentions of helping the scum hunt...then it's not really a funny joke anymore. Paperscrap's posts were really poor imo for a townie, but I can accept the possibility that he was "not being serious". One minute he's saying Paperscraps could have been joking around... On July 27 2013 18:54 exarezee wrote: Yea, so apparently everybody who was promoting this lunacy of lynch lurkers were all joking or setting a pretty miserable tarp. Which is why we never needed to go on this path of discussion to begin with. I like a wagon on paperscraps. ...and two posts later, he's saying he wants Paperscraps dead. Why does he feel the need to say, "Oh, yea, Paperscraps might have been joking around...but he's scum anyway." This line of reasoning does not bode well for his alignment. Only scum would be pushing someone while setting themselves up with an excuse for a town flip. Still reading, I'm on page 10 right now. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote: The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise. The carefree posts and lack of reading comprehension to make an actual case or a real quote of what i said makes me lean town on oat and captain jack. i'm not sure if oats is clueless and blind or a savante. it's either or and no in between. will wait to make that judgement. i see no reason to move my vote of FT at the moment. I will of course give him a chance to defend himself. But his posts on day 1 are bad. And if it was a joke, it was pretty bad jokes imo. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
A response to my case on your would also be appreciated | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:46 exarezee wrote: The carefree posts and lack of reading comprehension to make an actual case or a real quote of what i said makes me lean town on oat and captain jack. i'm not sure if oats is clueless and blind or a savante. it's either or and no in between. will wait to make that judgement. i see no reason to move my vote of FT at the moment. I will of course give him a chance to defend himself. But his posts on day 1 are bad. And if it was a joke, it was pretty bad jokes imo. You mean papers, right? that's who your vote is on | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:47 Koshi wrote: Oats you are posting way too much mate. At this point you are hurting town. Nope. Why do people always bring up this 'hurting' town thing. I dont get it. Nothing that creates more content is hurting town. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote: The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise. Oats is really doing his best in this regard... So, oats which part of your case do you want me to adress? As for scumreads: Paper still looks scummy to me for the same reasons i mentioned before. You start to look scummy to me because you are killing town atmosphere and keeping tunneling me with that joke of a case. I don't have any other scumreads as of yet. There are plenty of people who didn't contribute nearly enough to really judge them based on their posts. | ||
|
exarezee
United States423 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:49 Clarity_nl wrote: You mean papers, right? that's who your vote is on ah yes, papers. sorry. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:51 justanothertownie wrote: Oats is really doing his best in this regard... So, oats which part of your case do you want me to adress? As for scumreads: Paper still looks scummy to me for the same reasons i mentioned before. You start to look scummy to me because you are killing town atmosphere and keeping tunneling me with that joke of a case. I don't have any other scumreads as of yet. There are plenty of people who didn't contribute nearly enough to really judge them based on their posts. OMGUS? nice response. How is me tunneling you scummy? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Nope. Why do people always bring up this 'hurting' town thing. I dont get it. Nothing that creates more content is hurting town. You made a case 1 hour ago. Since then you have made around 35 other posts. Not too much on that case, but way much on arguing with 1 liners about a lot of crap. Some of it is useful but most of it is just spamming the thread. I wanted to make a case on Clarity harddefending justanothertownie, but at this point I don't know if clarity is doing that because he is scum or because he wants you to be wrong. Look at your own filter. It's getting insane. 1 good case followed by 35 one liners. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:53 Koshi wrote: You made a case 1 hour ago. Since then you have made around 35 other posts. Not too much on that case, but way much on arguing with 1 liners about a lot of crap. Some of it is useful but most of it is just spamming the thread. I wanted to make a case on Clarity harddefending justanothertownie, but at this point I don't know if clarity is doing that because he is scum or because he wants you to be wrong. Look at your own filter. It's getting insane. 1 good case followed by 35 one liners. Clarity is probably town. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On July 28 2013 01:52 Oatsmaster wrote: OMGUS? nice response. How is me tunneling you scummy? Sigh. Because you try to make it look like you are really contributing and scumhunting while you just repeat the same things all over again without bringing any good points. Let's just assume i was not in the game - who would you want to lynch? | ||
| ||
