|
How was it a bus? We came very close to a no lynch
|
On August 10 2013 12:50 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 09 2013 05:22 Umasi wrote:
##VOTE ALAKASLAM
I have trouble asking you about your motivations because everything you've done this game has been "this guy posted a case, sheep it" "wait no my biggest scumread posted a case against someone else who might be scum, I'll roll with THAT."What you've done hasn't been as pro-town as deus, who has posted a lot of sense making posts, his defense of me would be strange if he was scum (and the defense itself is solid). So much of your posting is just irrational nonsense, and the things that you say actually pertaining to the game aren't actually helpful frequently. one good thing you've done is pressure me super obviously, which made me make my defense.
The biggest thing I read you town on besides that is deciding to vote Gotard, but you're later to the party than the other potential candidate, who pressures him a lot better constantly.
For instance, why did you vote to lynch RDO? That was really poorly explained on your part.
Your individual posts don't read as scummy(just crazy), but the overall narrative IS, where you just hard follow towns opinion, and where you distance yourself from the reps lynch and then hammer it in.
Notice this, bringing it up as it is the most condensed case. All of these things are true. You know what? I was in an offsite game once. I'm gonna have to use it as it affected the way I approach the game and reminds me of a point y'all just aren't seeing. Bak to the offsite game. I understood the thread a lot better, and was kind of quiet compared to usual (I still double posted and said I thought x was scum and nobody could convince me otherwise but hey) I knew the first lynch would be a mislynch, didn't know why he was being lynched but didn't fight it. I then was able to see how motives are formed sometimes, and one guy I knew well started to his randomly say I was scum and push lynching me. In fact he started this day 1, nobody listened to him. When I was nk'ed, he got a ton of towncred and could push any lynch he wanted practically but he was also taken out eventually. What was my alignment? How about the other guy? How does this relate to this game?
Hopefully you guys can see that this post is pointless. Slam does this a lot. Who is he making a case against again? Oh right me! Why is he quoting Umasi and talking about him? It is completely irrelevant if you are trying to build a case against me. Slam does this sort of thing to appear like he contributing. He is trying to appear pro town. Pointless quote and useless followup. He still has not made a strong case against me. Ill say it again, he has been cherry picking town mistakes because he can't build a solid case.
|
On August 10 2013 12:38 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2013 08:17 Umasi wrote:
stim, it's not what infii wants (although you can use that as reasoning)
I want to hear YOUR thoughts haha
Like, I'm kind of angry that you've been so not around, forty some hours of not posting.
~but me being angry at you is certainly nothing new :< Holy balls looking for the "cop slip" ran across this, I totally missed this post at the time. if I was gone 40 hours in a row I didn't realize it, that must have been a time when work picked up- e.g. People hating mad at me in Washington or something. I am still looking for the "cop slip"
Another great example. Why did you quote here just to say "I totally missed this post"? What the fuck. Do you have something to say about it?
|
What explanation do you have for not contributing slam? Why do you have so many pointless posts?
|
On August 10 2013 13:14 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2013 13:06 Umasi wrote:yeah, just making sure I didn't miss anything. On August 10 2013 12:50 Alakaslam wrote:On August 09 2013 05:22 Umasi wrote:
##VOTE ALAKASLAM
I have trouble asking you about your motivations because everything you've done this game has been "this guy posted a case, sheep it" "wait no my biggest scumread posted a case against someone else who might be scum, I'll roll with THAT."What you've done hasn't been as pro-town as deus, who has posted a lot of sense making posts, his defense of me would be strange if he was scum (and the defense itself is solid). So much of your posting is just irrational nonsense, and the things that you say actually pertaining to the game aren't actually helpful frequently. one good thing you've done is pressure me super obviously, which made me make my defense.
The biggest thing I read you town on besides that is deciding to vote Gotard, but you're later to the party than the other potential candidate, who pressures him a lot better constantly.
For instance, why did you vote to lynch RDO? That was really poorly explained on your part.
Your individual posts don't read as scummy(just crazy), but the overall narrative IS, where you just hard follow towns opinion, and where you distance yourself from the reps lynch and then hammer it in.
Notice this, bringing it up as it is the most condensed case. All of these things are true. You know what? I was in an offsite game once. I'm gonna have to use it as it affected the way I approach the game and reminds me of a point y'all just aren't seeing. Bak to the offsite game. I understood the thread a lot better, and was kind of quiet compared to usual (I still double posted and said I thought x was scum and nobody could convince me otherwise but hey) I knew the first lynch would be a mislynch, didn't know why he was being lynched but didn't fight it. I then was able to see how motives are formed sometimes, and one guy I knew well started to his randomly say I was scum and push lynching me. In fact he started this day 1, nobody listened to him. When I was nk'ed, he got a ton of towncred and could push any lynch he wanted practically but he was also taken out eventually. What was my alignment? How about the other guy? How does this relate to this game? Is there a reason you quoted me at all? You quoted me then addressed none of it =/ I quoted it because it Summs up the false point of view quite nicely. I can't call you a liar, but nothing short of proving that you are would work would it? So why the hell are we even playing- just give the game to DeusX, as frankly he deserves it! He has fought through absolutely crummy odds. But there is this Deus plays just like my old Godfather.
You have nothing to back up shit like this. You never give us examples or solid analysis. Slam, please show us your best contribution in the first 10 pages of your filter and tell us why it is pro town.
|
On August 10 2013 13:24 StiMaDDict wrote:
As of right now, I'm willing to vote Deus.
Stim why would you vote me?
|
On August 10 2013 13:24 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2013 13:19 DeusXmachina wrote:On August 10 2013 13:14 Alakaslam wrote:On August 10 2013 13:06 Umasi wrote:yeah, just making sure I didn't miss anything. On August 10 2013 12:50 Alakaslam wrote:On August 09 2013 05:22 Umasi wrote:
##VOTE ALAKASLAM
I have trouble asking you about your motivations because everything you've done this game has been "this guy posted a case, sheep it" "wait no my biggest scumread posted a case against someone else who might be scum, I'll roll with THAT."What you've done hasn't been as pro-town as deus, who has posted a lot of sense making posts, his defense of me would be strange if he was scum (and the defense itself is solid). So much of your posting is just irrational nonsense, and the things that you say actually pertaining to the game aren't actually helpful frequently. one good thing you've done is pressure me super obviously, which made me make my defense.
The biggest thing I read you town on besides that is deciding to vote Gotard, but you're later to the party than the other potential candidate, who pressures him a lot better constantly.
For instance, why did you vote to lynch RDO? That was really poorly explained on your part.
Your individual posts don't read as scummy(just crazy), but the overall narrative IS, where you just hard follow towns opinion, and where you distance yourself from the reps lynch and then hammer it in.
Notice this, bringing it up as it is the most condensed case. All of these things are true. You know what? I was in an offsite game once. I'm gonna have to use it as it affected the way I approach the game and reminds me of a point y'all just aren't seeing. Bak to the offsite game. I understood the thread a lot better, and was kind of quiet compared to usual (I still double posted and said I thought x was scum and nobody could convince me otherwise but hey) I knew the first lynch would be a mislynch, didn't know why he was being lynched but didn't fight it. I then was able to see how motives are formed sometimes, and one guy I knew well started to his randomly say I was scum and push lynching me. In fact he started this day 1, nobody listened to him. When I was nk'ed, he got a ton of towncred and could push any lynch he wanted practically but he was also taken out eventually. What was my alignment? How about the other guy? How does this relate to this game? Is there a reason you quoted me at all? You quoted me then addressed none of it =/ I quoted it because it Summs up the false point of view quite nicely. I can't call you a liar, but nothing short of proving that you are would work would it? So why the hell are we even playing- just give the game to DeusX, as frankly he deserves it! He has fought through absolutely crummy odds. But there is this Deus plays just like my old Godfather. You have nothing to back up shit like this. You never give us examples or solid analysis. Slam, please show us your best contribution in the first 10 pages of your filter and tell us why it is pro town. Nope, it doesn't exist congrats. Our definitions of pro-town are different. Indeed mine is changing. My whole attempts at clearing myself are town. I can't just freaking pull stuff out of my ass. I painted myself into a corner. I'm only still playing because it would be jackass of me to give up.
Show us what you think is your best contribution then and tell us why it is pro town/ a noteworthy contribution.
|
On August 10 2013 13:39 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2013 13:34 DeusXmachina wrote:On August 10 2013 13:24 Alakaslam wrote:On August 10 2013 13:19 DeusXmachina wrote:On August 10 2013 13:14 Alakaslam wrote:On August 10 2013 13:06 Umasi wrote:yeah, just making sure I didn't miss anything. On August 10 2013 12:50 Alakaslam wrote:On August 09 2013 05:22 Umasi wrote:
##VOTE ALAKASLAM
I have trouble asking you about your motivations because everything you've done this game has been "this guy posted a case, sheep it" "wait no my biggest scumread posted a case against someone else who might be scum, I'll roll with THAT."What you've done hasn't been as pro-town as deus, who has posted a lot of sense making posts, his defense of me would be strange if he was scum (and the defense itself is solid). So much of your posting is just irrational nonsense, and the things that you say actually pertaining to the game aren't actually helpful frequently. one good thing you've done is pressure me super obviously, which made me make my defense.
The biggest thing I read you town on besides that is deciding to vote Gotard, but you're later to the party than the other potential candidate, who pressures him a lot better constantly.
For instance, why did you vote to lynch RDO? That was really poorly explained on your part.
Your individual posts don't read as scummy(just crazy), but the overall narrative IS, where you just hard follow towns opinion, and where you distance yourself from the reps lynch and then hammer it in.
Notice this, bringing it up as it is the most condensed case. All of these things are true. You know what? I was in an offsite game once. I'm gonna have to use it as it affected the way I approach the game and reminds me of a point y'all just aren't seeing. Bak to the offsite game. I understood the thread a lot better, and was kind of quiet compared to usual (I still double posted and said I thought x was scum and nobody could convince me otherwise but hey) I knew the first lynch would be a mislynch, didn't know why he was being lynched but didn't fight it. I then was able to see how motives are formed sometimes, and one guy I knew well started to his randomly say I was scum and push lynching me. In fact he started this day 1, nobody listened to him. When I was nk'ed, he got a ton of towncred and could push any lynch he wanted practically but he was also taken out eventually. What was my alignment? How about the other guy? How does this relate to this game? Is there a reason you quoted me at all? You quoted me then addressed none of it =/ I quoted it because it Summs up the false point of view quite nicely. I can't call you a liar, but nothing short of proving that you are would work would it? So why the hell are we even playing- just give the game to DeusX, as frankly he deserves it! He has fought through absolutely crummy odds. But there is this Deus plays just like my old Godfather. You have nothing to back up shit like this. You never give us examples or solid analysis. Slam, please show us your best contribution in the first 10 pages of your filter and tell us why it is pro town. Nope, it doesn't exist congrats. Our definitions of pro-town are different. Indeed mine is changing. My whole attempts at clearing myself are town. I can't just freaking pull stuff out of my ass. I painted myself into a corner. I'm only still playing because it would be jackass of me to give up. Show us what you think is your best contribution then and tell us why it is pro town/ a noteworthy contribution. Look. Have you been playing a good game or haven't you? You have said you weren't. I never said I was. Now I think you would say you have been playing a good game. I AM WELL AWARE I HAVEN'T DONE WHAT YOU ALL CALL CONTRIBUTING. However, I am technically contributing right now! I could have given up like I basically did at noon. But... I am contributing as I know how.
Would you please show us your best contribution in the first 10 pages of your filter. I does not matter if I think it is a good contribution. Please explain why it is a good contribution (in your opinion) and why it is pro town (in your opinion). If you are town and you have not given up you should be able to do this.
|
Stim, why are you hesitant to vote Slam? I don't want to sound rude but it seems like you just don't care.
|
On August 10 2013 13:46 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2013 01:29 Alakaslam wrote:
unvoting the reps, Indio jones get back on scam, we can counter wagon this bs Self explanatory.
It is interesting that you point to this one out. Maybe because it involves you distancing yourself from scum? This is a very weak pro town post. I would argue that it is not even pro town. Scam was not a viable candidate to be lynched. You did not back this vote switch up with any reasoning. You did not even try to counter wagon. Instead last minute you switched your vote to "help town secure the lynch". Why were you not more aggressive against scam if you believed he was scum? Why did you not push for a scam vote?
|
On August 11 2013 02:50 StiMaDDict wrote:
##Vote: Deus
Why stim? Please give us reasons!
|
On August 11 2013 03:01 StiMaDDict wrote:
Because infi voted Gotard first, then Alakaslam and Umasi, then Deus.
It's you Umasi or Deus.
And you voted him last....
|
Stim we came dangerously close to a no-lynch. I was trying very aggressively to get a lynch on Gotard.
|
So Stim you would rather lynch someone who has played aggressive and active? Someone who has contributed and had original ideas? Someone who has not been blending in? Someone who has played without fear?
vs.
Someone who has not contributed? Someone who HAS been blending in (no one has targeted slam till now)? Someone who is inconsistent and indecisive? Someone who repeats what others say? Someone who is not aggressive?
Stim please! Think about this. My aggression is not scummy. I have taken very strong stances. I have put myself out there. If you vote slam we win today. Why has slam tried to appear so active, all the while not helping town?
|
I did vote. I agree. Ty for the vote.
|
|
|
On August 11 2013 04:43 StiMaDDict wrote:gg wp, guys. Hardest game I've played so far. Being blue is not that fun, rather confusing and stressful. I'm scum btw + Show Spoiler +
I don't know how this compares to other games because this is my first one. All I know is this game can be very challenging.
GG
|
|
|
Sorry town. I fucked up. I helped scum more than I helped town. I have failed. And I am sad  .
|
Also GJ Umasi. I think you played amazing! Your team played amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
