On August 03 2013 07:05 infii wrote:
At this point I looked weak/neutral because I didn't want to determine myself on something as it was still early on day1. So I was a possibly easy-to-lynch target from scum perspective.
How you were easy-to-lynch target from scum perspective? You were "posting reads" and trying to look like a town. Reps was easy lynch because he didn't post anything that might look pro town. Scam is an easy lynch now.
On August 03 2013 07:05 infii wrote:
I defended myself like Gotard wanted - not enough. I wrote a wall of text going in-depth on my arguments in full detail - still not enough.
You've never defended yourself. Never told us why nightcat was your 2nd scumread and when you explained your initial read on Umasi you've used his post after your read has been already posted. Where is logic in here?
On August 03 2013 09:32 Alakaslam wrote:
Also Gotard Umasi both hiding facts! Can be unintentional but ignoring convenient stuff. Is pushing agenda and confusing.
But I am confusing.
What "facts" are we hiding? You are confusing because you post some weird shit sometimes and you won't even bother explain it.
Umasi:
Most of what Gotard has posted about infii has had merit, which is why I voted him. He's been noncommittal, has posted excuses for not posting (it's too hard to do(fuck try anyway dammit))
tbth, I don't know what to think of gotard, since he's always kinda scummy to me, but never REALLY scummy.
I still think that Gotard was pushing infii with legitimate points
infii was a better target because he spent more time defending himself, the points brought up against him were strong and I agreed with them (go read gotards filter) (this also happens to be why holyflare lumped us together)
Me and gotard being similarly suspicious of infii isn't weird, people who think that infii was town are weird, because he was scummy (not anymore)
So he's changing his vote risking no-lynch because someone who is scummy brought good points. OK!
He engages infii in useless discussion about no lynching or not. He's saying he's scummy because infii has different opinions, not because infii has scum motivations.
Useless discussion? I wanted to get reasoning behind his thoughts.
"discussion about no lynching or not" I was saying that lynching townie isn't useless for town because it gives information. I wasn't talking about no lynching.
The rest of his filter (he doesn't post more till after lynch) is just null to me.
He changed his vote mainly because my posts and then he decided that those posts were scummy.
##vote: Umasi