|
On August 03 2013 13:09 Alakaslam wrote:I'll borrow from your quote and quote you. Show nested quote +
"Specifically this line:
"Why is he more useful than them if he's repetitive and "either newbie town in a helpless situation with almost no way out or he is scum trying desperately to stay alive". This is not what town does. Why is he useful in any way? Because he posts more? Quantity doesn't mean usefulness."
He's disagreeing with infii, he gives the impression that he thinks reps is scum, but he doesn't actually vote reps -.-"
This is FAR scummier than your behavior. Wow. The best defense is really a good offense, always XD Feh. Gotard defense thyself And thistime I move rashly it's 9:00 that's past bedtime so I'm sleepy goes and ##votes Gotard manUmasi you may be wondering how I was like "TUNNNNNNNNN NEL TO THE DEATH!!!!!!!" And now all cool & stuff Well you did explain yourself from a town perspective. You pointed out the possibility and likelihood of simply forgetting a past stance in the heat of the moment. If you actually are scum, this is a great newbie scum training moment -_-, but if you are town, that is maybe a close call? But only person as voted you is RDO, so I back off until people come read an give their thoughts.
|
On August 04 2013 13:43 Nightcat99 wrote:
i like tsunami, can we call him that from now on?
Ask him.
But my quote make some think my reasoning is pathetic... Aaaaaauuuugggbhhhhhhhhhh!!! I do NOT know what to do
|
On August 04 2013 13:46 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 13:43 Nightcat99 wrote:
i like tsunami, can we call him that from now on? Ask him. But my quote makes me think my reasoning is pathetic... Aaaaaauuuugggbhhhhhhhhhh!!! I do NOT know what to do
Autocorrect was really working hard on that one
EBWOP.
|
|
|
On August 04 2013 13:49 Alakaslam wrote:
Btw 16:49 GMT (+00:00)
Forgot to use 24 hr clock
04:52 GMT (+00:00)
|
On August 04 2013 13:51 Nightcat99 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 13:45 Alakaslam wrote:On August 03 2013 13:09 Alakaslam wrote:I'll borrow from your quote and quote you.
"Specifically this line:
"Why is he more useful than them if he's repetitive and "either newbie town in a helpless situation with almost no way out or he is scum trying desperately to stay alive". This is not what town does. Why is he useful in any way? Because he posts more? Quantity doesn't mean usefulness."
He's disagreeing with infii, he gives the impression that he thinks reps is scum, but he doesn't actually vote reps -.-"
This is FAR scummier than your behavior. Wow. The best defense is really a good offense, always XD Feh. Gotard defense thyself And thistime I move rashly it's 9:00 that's past bedtime so I'm sleepy goes and ##votes Gotard manUmasi you may be wondering how I was like "TUNNNNNNNNN NEL TO THE DEATH!!!!!!!" And now all cool & stuff Well you did explain yourself from a town perspective. You pointed out the possibility and likelihood of simply forgetting a past stance in the heat of the moment. If you actually are scum, this is a great newbie scum training moment -_-, but if you are town, that is maybe a close call? But only person as voted you is RDO, so I back off until people come read an give their thoughts. you are going to have to explain this to me, isnt this your quote, what did gotard do?
Show nested quote, he said squishy was scummy and then went and voted Indio.
|
Gotard has explained that since. I initially voted Umasi but did not like tat only Gotard and RDO were voting him and Indio was voting Gotard.
|
On August 04 2013 13:53 Nightcat99 wrote:
the two people holy think is a scum team is hitting each other over the face with a bat.
I had so much confident in his reads too , i bet he is rolling over in his obs forum.
(Well he through i was scum too) guess i shallnt have mention that lol
Peh feel free.
Over the rainbow I was scum once. We had 1/2 member count KP, rounded up, so if we were all alive (3) we had 2 KP. I was told to lurk, refused; when it looked like I had been found out I said "bus me" and they did. Next move was to attack each other so xD
But we lost. Vigi OP when he is {redacted}, he actually Vigi-d me I think because somehow town was more willing to lynch 3p over scum who did not defend himself except by noob card (hell yeah I am so cool)
|
On August 04 2013 13:55 Nightcat99 wrote:
Ya i agree that vote on infil was odd too and i try to pressure him a little on it.
but i generally dont think scum wants to start a wagon but gotard try to start a wagon on infil, so i just through it was a rash decision.
Scum can do whatever they want
|
On August 04 2013 13:53 Nightcat99 wrote:
the two people holy think is a scum team is hitting each other over the face with a bat.
I had so much confident in his reads too , i bet he is rolling over in his obs forum.
(Well he through i was scum too) guess i shallnt have mention that lol
![[image loading]](http://archive.patteroast.net/vis/BatHit.gif)
I swear I couldn't help it
|
On August 04 2013 14:01 Nightcat99 wrote:
so what you are saying is you are not buying their attack on each other and think this could be a play they are setting up?
I had to make sure i am understand you right :D
Yes
SoCal page 35 FTW
|
Gotard scam deus/RDO, would need time
Given can lynch both got scam wave (tsunami{Umasi})
|
On August 04 2013 14:14 Umasi wrote:
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :<
Pseudo case?
And heck I don't even remember I think it's been happening since before this game
But hey man I am Sarah palin's sheep according to Day[9]
Alaska's lamb! Yeeeeeesums
Obligatory:  Day[9]
|
On August 04 2013 14:25 Nightcat99 wrote:
last game i only have a few people i through was scummy, ( i was completely wrong but atleast there was only a few people)
This game, i wont be surprise that you are all scums and i am playing alone.
There is so many non talkative people in this game, its so hard to get a read.
Like Umasi said, have to pray my portrait isn't in the game
Well, there is an unusually high concentration of them
And dark swarm only makes it worse
Hehehe I want to play some broodwar
|
On August 04 2013 14:08 Nightcat99 wrote:
I dont know why but i was kind of expecting that to happen.
Yet i cant stop laughing here in real life.
U see the ##s
35
53
SoCal FTW
|
|
|
On August 04 2013 15:48 infii wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 14:14 Umasi wrote:
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :< Don't think you will get so easily off the hook tsunami, err mumasmi... masamumi? origami? Just kidding :D If gotard flips red you are still under heavy suspicion. We still need 2 more votes on gotard. I'd like to complete a possible lynch on him as early as possible to get him out of his hole and defend himself. I will perceive a non-vote on him or switching votes to someone else as a scum read.
Barring further evidence I hope you mean
|
I am wondering why town so inactive? Or am I on here like unnaturally nonstop? It seems like all today nothing ha happened.
|
Oh hi there!
I missed all you cohosts
I am truly sorry for excluding you folks earlier. My out-of-line idea was a flop anyway though ofc, so y'all missed nothing.
Back to the game: Umasi imma go quote the post Indio is talking about. So as no hay excusas.
|
On August 03 2013 08:14 infii wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2013 07:50 Umasi wrote:
infii, did you even read the message I linked? The entire reason I unvoted is BECAUSE of what I thought of reps and you.
It was not clear that reps was going to be lynched, here's why:
If it were clear, then people wouldn't get angry at me for endangering the lynch. and the entire point behind my reasoning is that I'd have preferred a no lynch than a reps lynch. Yes I read your post. What I was trying to ask is: why did you unvote reps specifically at that time so close before lynch? What did you hope to accomplish by this? As you stated reps convinced you to swap to a possible no-lynch with this argument: "I can help win this game much more then RDaneelOlivaw or sc_a.M." I just can't get my mind around how that sentence can change an opinion at all, and like I said, especially at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
