Well that's what I've been doing this whole cycle - something different - yet you've been harping on my TG reasoning. If you're after "something different" then why not comment on all the "different" I've been doing SINCE then? :/

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 00:42 GMT

#795

yeah, you're being pretty weird.

~marv

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 00:44 GMT

#797

Let me try and rephrase my reasons then.

"Not screaming townie"
On D1, I basically narrow down the lynch to players I will lynch by first generating a list of players I WILL NOT lynch. TG was easily not on the list of players I WILL NOT lynch, but as for why he was demoted from null to WILL LYNCH...

"Attempting to APPEAR townie"

On July 22 2013 12:43 TanGeng wrote:
Tofu,

I'm multitasking. Doing two things at the same time.
When votes are counted, lynching an active based on evidence is preferable to lynching an inactive.
I'm poking the inactives while I still have time.

On July 22 2013 13:35 TanGeng wrote:
Don't lynch me. It really was trying to stir up some activity. I'm trying to help out town and austin just jumped all over me.

On July 22 2013 14:15 TanGeng wrote:
Plurality Lynch?

Hmm. Might be GG for me and 4 others

On July 22 2013 14:38 TanGeng wrote:
I'm not scum! I am just trying to stir up activity and seriously if one mislynch can get activity instead of a bad quiet game, then I'd make that trade because town can actually win with the activity, but right now we're not get activity and you're just tunneling on me.

5T,
About the list comment, it's facetious!
Your list was fine for its timing and Tofu was calling me useless. The list themselves aren't all that useful.

I saw these posts as attempting to look "just like a good townie" after being called out for his less-than-stellar posts about Tofu and I leaving him off our "lurker lists" or whatever.

Taken with the fact that there was resistance to his lynch (when I entered the thread he still had a few votes to even reach majority) and the fact that we had so many lurkers, I thought it better to lynch into a weak scumread rather than roll the dice on a null.

I hope this helps, but honestly I don't know why any of this isn't clear from what I've posted.

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 01:53 GMT

#804

There is no heat, I'm the only one saying he's suspicious are you high dude?

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 05:53 GMT

#815

If so many are wrong about you that you no longer want to play...

...why are they the ones who are dumb?

Think about that while you reread the thread Oats. It will benefit you regardless of your alignment.

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 10:35 GMT

#845

Hi Onegu. I'd quite like to see TAA post a couple more times before I offer an updated opinion on him. Because reasons :>

~marv

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 11:12 GMT

#849

On July 23 2013 20:09 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
rayns post mortem.
Main thing rayne was concerned with day 1 was fighting with firmtofu, calling each other scum.
Austincc thought rayn was town whereas oats was convinced rayn was scum.
Tangeng joined the the rayn is scum train of thought later, but wasnt half as convinced as rayn was.
Speculation: id guess oats is town because it would be really stupid to tunnel some townie and then shoot him
super speculation: oats might be vigi and shot rayne but i dont know where the mafia killpower went then.
Alternatively firmtofu might have been scum who didnt like the pressure. Happy wifom everyone

None of this helps anything or adds anything. What conclusions are you drawing? You're just stating silly hypotheticals. Who are you suspicious of today? etc.

~marv

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 12:34 GMT

#863

On July 23 2013 21:18 Onegu wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why even ask this? Why are you baiting me keep this up and I will shoot you.

Am I the only one curious about this?

~marv

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 12:37 GMT

#866

Sorry, why did you claim?

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 12:39 GMT

#869

Apparently I missed it the first time. The question remains.

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 12:42 GMT

#872

Yeah, that makes absolutely zero sense. Please explain.

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 12:53 GMT

#873

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 13:01 GMT

#876

On July 23 2013 21:58 Onegu wrote:
This way I can see how people react to my claim, gathering the most info. Also I can see how my town reads respond to give me the best chance to hit scum, this is only my fifth game and I really dont want to waste my shot, so I tried do do something that would give me the best chance to hit scum.

You don't want to waste your shot, so you claimed so that scum can roleblock and/or kill you?

Really?

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 13:04 GMT

#878

You don't see why they would roleblock a vigilante who can shoot mafia?

My head is exploding right now.

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 13:04 GMT

#879

Your reasoning for claiming -----> to have the highest chance of hitting mafia

Yet you do not see why mafia might like to prevent this

??????

FiveTouch

Marshall Islands1474 Posts

July 23 2013 13:06 GMT

#881

Mafia would be so much easier if townies always played sensibly. Then I could just lynch Onegu and know we'd hit mafia.

Gonna have to wait on VE to see what he thinks, because just... wow.