|
On July 22 2013 10:31 Oatsmaster wrote: lynch ryaryrayrayrayryan.
It sucks that whenever Im here, no one fucking talks.
Anyway rayn is scum. Game is ez. cant be arsed with voting for now. Convince me.
|
On July 22 2013 10:38 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 10:34 getmoript wrote:On July 22 2013 10:00 austinmcc wrote: My apologies.
Pretty please explain that sentence and your vote. Looks to me like he's posting as he's catching up with the thread. I don't really understand why people do that, or at least do so without explicitly saying they're going to do so and vote and shit when it may be completely irrelevant by the time they've caught up. So....4 or so hours to go. Half the thread hasn't voted, a bunch of people have barely posted. 5T, lurker lynch or do we stay on TAA? Tangeng and Tofu, same question to you. Does it really? Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 09:08 TanGeng wrote: Hey all, got back and looking through the thread as the deadline starts to get closer.
Let's go look over the who might look like a surer lynch among the actives. If no clear candidate, let's go with an inactive. Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 09:27 TanGeng wrote:I'm not even the most inactive in this game Fuck! This is going to be bad for town. At this point I'm looking at the most active filter: getmoript. All this stuff looks townie for me right now. Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 09:45 TanGeng wrote: I'm going to vote for JJD at this point, an initial pressure/suspicion vote.
Getript suggests that we should be lynching him. A bit later, he shows up for a short little post about Tofu and then promptly goes to sleep. As getript suggests "convenient."
Also 5T, what are you doing leaving me off your lists!!! You too Tofu!!! I am useless. Totally useless. He's catching up, then 19 minutes later has decided he's not the most inactive, and is looking at your filter. Then 18 minutes later, he knows that you said JJD's entrance was convenient. But he doesn't talk about anything else in your filter. Doesn't say anything of his own except that he's useless. Doesn't notice that your vote isn't actually on the guy he's now voting for. Is pressure voting with no time left and not actually adding any pressure. lol well now that he's shown up again and apparently is sticking with JJD haha btw dis WAVU
|
Fwiw, Austin, the last couple posts are all Wave. I dislike TG, but I've been burned on him before. Where's Marv/VE? Also, I want your thoughts on Rayn @Austin ~g
|
VE made the lurker list Austin. Not Marv.
|
That's my take on that hydra. I think VE is busy though because he cut his game from the queu. Afaik he's not in any other games. I forget if he's still live in Sicilian but I don't remember reading much in his filter there.
|
NM he was lynched there. Prolly raging somewhere.
|
I'm at work still and will be on for a bit on and off ~g
|
@TG. You think I'm town right?
|
I ask because I have like super hella meta on JJD. He's one of like 3-4 people who i am 100% on my meta reads on. All that pressure was to get a reaction from him. I'm fine-ish on him right now. I'd like to see more before solidify him as green but I don't want to lynch him today. Move your vote.
|
Also. Answer Austin's questions. I want to see them too.
|
On July 22 2013 12:01 TanGeng wrote: Argh, sometimes sharing these details is just a bad idea because then scum can meta the though process.
Coming into the post, JarJar jumped on Tofu who was the most obvious target and then leaves. This is most likely not indicative of scum as townies seem more likely to do it. But it does provide a quick way to try to pick up on some scum tells. This is an awful post. Town wants nothing more than to be active and completely transparent with their reads at all time. Why are you trying to get us to think about what scum want to do with your post before you even post it?
-Wave
I'm in the middle of doing a read into a couple people as Geript and I have been talking in the QT.
|
On July 22 2013 12:39 FirmTofu wrote: I would like to remind everyone that this game relies on majority voting. If we actually want a lynch today, we are going to have to consolidate on a single target. Start voting, people. Where does it say this?
|
On July 22 2013 12:45 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 12:39 FirmTofu wrote: I would like to remind everyone that this game relies on majority voting. If we actually want a lynch today, we are going to have to consolidate on a single target. Start voting, people. Waiting on friggin' getmoript to post. Actually interested in their thoughts on TanGeng. I found that first post of his scummy, where he voted JJD. I found his absolutely refusal to give reason for it, while commenting on a couple of other things and just repeatedly ducking something like giving reasons for his vote or explaining a comment he made to be mind-boggling. I don't understand it as EITHER faction. He didn't say no, he just consciously avoided specific things and yet answered other questions and poked at me once or twice. I can't understand townies not giving reasoning for their votes/reads, especially when I've seen him do it. I can't understand mafia just straight up going "Nope nope nope, better not acknowledge that someone wants my read here, better just drop my head in the sand." On average, I think it comes out scummy for me, as like a deer in the headlights reaction? Has TanGeng been mafia before? I really want getmoript's take on that and TanGeng overall, because despite spending this last bit removing the police uniforms and playing paddycake in their chat (or, you know, working), I'm interested in their thoughts. Having "misread" TanGeng before, or whatever that comment was, I'd like to know what was misread. Oats is still oats, and still looks like a perfectly fine lynch. But TanGeng also looks like a fine lynch to me atm, if this game actually has a lynch and doesn't just get shut down because nobody votes. I don't like TanGeng either, but given the fact that it's majority I'd rather eliminate some shit from the game early and if TanGeng is around he can help us with that. ##Unvote ##Vote: OatsMaster
We need what, 7 people to all vote him in 2 hours to secure a lynch? I don't see that happening if we're still trying to lynch a player who's active and in thread right now.
-Wave
|
WoS and I are ok with consolidating on Tang or Oats. Not sure either is possible.
|
Actually wait a minute. If it's Majority voting then why does the votecount from earlier say we were set to be lynched if we only had 2 votes? Clarification please. Do we need Majority (ie 7 votes) or plurality?
|
On July 22 2013 12:54 austinmcc wrote: What do you guys make of just the absolute refusal to talk about the JJD vote/read/"discussion" comment? On phone so posting limited. Basically WoS had a weak early town read based on mindset. I disagreed. I'm way more with you on this whole refusal to make sense of the JJD post. Him being bullied off his thoughts is non-alignment indicative. He's (TG) is acting odd but no show oats is pretty odd too. I really think that half the players here are busy/preoccupied w/ Sicilian and this game is taking a backseat to it. But I can see oats rolling scum and being all "fuck that I'll just play Sicilian". I think oats gives us more info than Tang personally. And right now that's about the best we can hope for IMO.
|
On July 22 2013 12:59 JarJarDrinks wrote: K, I'm here for just a bit. Basically enough time to read through stuff and vote. Sorry, dont want to make excuses but weekends are generally never good for me and this one was especially busy. I'll be normal tomorrow.
Anything/anyone specific people think I should really check out. Just read the thread and post thoughts as you go. It's super short.
|
Also. Neither WoS or I know wtf to think of DrH.
|
Oats wouldn't go afk scum if he had good players on his side. Plus gives tertiary reads on a few other players based on pushes etc.
|
Tangeng
Togo vote machine
|
|
|
|