EPTOn July 03 2013 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
I think fuba is more likely scum than survivor.
Marv thoughts?
I think fuba is more likely scum than survivor.
Marv thoughts?
Maybe, but WoS is more likely scum than even that.
Basterd Mini Mafia - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Maybe, but WoS is more likely scum than even that. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 22:58 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok both Vivax and Marv wanna lynch WoS for what reasons exactly? Forgive me for not reading the thread, but all the reasons are obfuscated by the claim shit which isnt even alignment indicative and is just speculation. I laid it out in one big post, it's in my filter. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=418641¤tpage=68#1349 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:02 Oatsmaster wrote: if hes scum, what shot? it's a fucking theoretical scenario, good god. If we work under the assumption he's town, then we also have to work under the assumption that he took a super-terrible shot. How is this complicated Oats????? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:05 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont know marv, you couldve included the word 'claim' in there. Also, why as scum would he fakeclaim such a terrible shot? why does it even matter? you understand perfectly well what i was saying, you're just being ridiculous. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:05 Vivax wrote: Apologies Oats, but I'm just too sure about this stuff to accept resistance. Nice pointing it out. Marv can only claim that WoS had real intention to shoot marv if he thinks WoS is town. He says WoS bad = WoS scum. He doesn't argue from a point of view where he assumes the shot is fake. Why would scum WoS claim that he shot marv in the first place? Marv has to explain that first of all. Only once you've explained what I keep pointing out to you. Except you can't, because it would involve me being a completely retarded scumplayer. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Validated by the fact rayn got shot and flipped town in fact. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:08 Oatsmaster wrote: no, the sentence is explaining why WoS is scum and apparently you switched perspective between points. WoS is scum because A. B. C. TERRIBLE SHOT.(scum dont have other guns dude, all vig shots are fake) Would you have included the word claimed on hindsight? no because it's fucking obvious already. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:09 Vivax wrote: You don't want to explain why your scumread is scum? Do you need incentives from me to push your scumread? I misread what you wrote and answered above. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:09 Oatsmaster wrote: are you deliberately avoiding using the word claimed? WHY DOES IT MATTER. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
i can't legislate for rank stupidity | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:13 Oatsmaster wrote: Thats why I said it was a scumslip? Because you know WoS's claim is true. So anyway, is WoS good at scum Marv? Important question. It's not a scumslip because it's SO UNBELIEVABLY OBVIOUS WHAT I WAS GETTING AT. Use your brain, PLEASE GOD PLEASE. WoS played a good scumgame in Les Mis, that doesn't mean he won't make a mistake (e.g. rayn pushing Hapa in Catch 22). It's infinitely less likely a town-WoS would try to shoot me than a scum-WoS would pretend to shoot me flying on rayn's coat-tails. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
do your own work. Oats, is the sky blue today? Are there cars in the car park? Is your name Oatsmaster? Would you count these grains of rice for me please? Are there mafia in this game? Do the tides come in an out, could you check for me please? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Still waiting for an answer on that, posted it like 7 times. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:22 Vivax wrote: There is no logic in arguing that a miller claim is too risky for you to do it. That is my answer. There's a tonne of logic. Go look at the numbers or work them out for yourself, then go figure out how there is almost zero upside and a massive downside. Just do the maths. Toddle off now. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
assuming there is survivor we started 8-3-1 lynch + NK = now 6-3-1 lynch town = 5-3-1 two NKs = 3-3-1 game over | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:29 Oatsmaster wrote: i thought common practice was to nolynch on mylo? Wanna talk about fuba? In your esteemed opinion bbygrl, is this genuine? Only at 3-1 really. Anything else is debatable at best. Say we no-lynch and they kill maybe gumshoe and Jarjar. Where are we except 2 townies down? Second paragraph there sounds pretty plausible. Although I'm not sure how much it's necessarily true that if scum got fakeclaims then survivor would get one too. Survivor not being inherently anti-town and all that. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 03 2013 23:33 Vivax wrote: Just sheep me man. I'm right, trust me. Done the maths and logic on that miller stuff yet Vivax? | ||
| ||
