I think fuba is more likely scum than survivor.
Marv thoughts?

The reason why WoS couldve claimed at daybreak is because scum already knew all the blue roles.

Lazer claimed Cop
Gum claimed vengeful
1 missing kp.
And only 1 kp.
so therefore the remaining role is Vig.
This is from info from the day post.

Stop using that to justify the lynch.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 13:56 GMT

#1403

Is today lylo/mylo?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 13:57 GMT

#1409

Only 1 kill.
Whatever Vivax.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 13:58 GMT

#1410

Ok both Vivax and Marv wanna lynch WoS for what reasons exactly? Forgive me for not reading the thread, but all the reasons are obfuscated by the claim shit which isnt even alignment indicative and is just speculation.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 13:59 GMT

#1412

marv didnt get shot cause marv wasnt playing.

lazer has suspicious claim.

Although a RB that would dely the check seems to be better than a random RB.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:01 GMT

#1414

scumslip

he took a totally unexplainable shot at me last night when I don't think he's anywhere near that terrible. It's very simple.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:02 GMT

#1418

if hes scum, what shot?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:03 GMT

#1420

On July 03 2013 23:02 Lazermonkey wrote:
EBWOP: Lol, I meant to say that I can't do anything with my check D1 so random RB doesn't actually seem to bad especially if iGrok doesn't inform you if you are getting RBed or not. That was quite the opposite of what I just said XD

well, for me, I think a RB that is useful is better than a random RB on a dude that is probably useless.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:05 GMT

#1423

I dont know marv, you couldve included the word 'claim' in there.

Also, why as scum would he fakeclaim such a terrible shot?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:08 GMT

#1429

On July 03 2013 23:06 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

why does it even matter? you understand perfectly well what i was saying, you're just being ridiculous.

no, the sentence is explaining why WoS is scum and apparently you switched perspective between points.

On July 03 2013 20:11 marvellosity wrote:
WoS is scum because he passively encouraged rayn in his dumb crusade, he repeatedly flung shit at me without explaining it, and then he took a totally unexplainable shot at me last night when I don't think he's anywhere near that terrible. It's very simple.

WoS is scum because
A.
B.
C. TERRIBLE SHOT.(scum dont have other guns dude, all vig shots are fake)

Would you have included the word claimed on hindsight?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:09 GMT

#1432

are you deliberately avoiding using the word claimed?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:10 GMT

#1435

marv, is WoS any good as scum?

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:10 GMT

#1436

On July 03 2013 23:09 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

WHY DOES IT MATTER. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU

Because if you dont use the word claimed, it means you think its true.
If you think its true, WoS cant be scum.
If you think its true, you are scum.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

July 03 2013 14:13 GMT

#1438

On July 03 2013 23:11 marvellosity wrote:
only if you read it like a total idiot who doesn't understand what it's saying even though it's 100% obvious

i can't legislate for rank stupidity

Thats why I said it was a scumslip?
Because you know WoS's claim is true.

So anyway, is WoS good at scum Marv? Important question.