|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
So let me get this straight:
geript, xfire, and I are scum buddies.
I decide to claim in the thread about the TARDIS, knowing that xfire created it, because outing two scum members is totally worth the one-shot medic protect. xfire decided to claim in the thread that he created the TARDIS role to implicate himself, because why not?! Kurumi is lying about the TARDIS getting drained because he likes to troll town and my role has nothing to do with the TARDIS. Geript decides to use his day vig power on myself, knowing that I have the bus drive ability and can bus the results of the vote to any player, but rather than challenging someone like Sk8r and busing a shot from Sk8r to BC anonymously, he wants to shoot his scum buddy and implicate the two of us even more.
That's the most likely scenario? LOL
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
So kurumi is lying? That's the story you're sticking to?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Rather than save Meapak with a bus, throwing away a free hit and confirming BC, I decided that I'm going to bus my scum buddies own vig shot on myself to another player.
GOTTA MAKE THE BIG PLAYS
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 29 2013 01:34 gonzaw wrote: You are 3P survivor, why do you give a shit what we think of Xfire if you win either way?
Why would you get nervous just because some townie is speculating about some random players you SHOULDNT care about? You havent' posted ANY interesting thing at all until right now, yet a random townie accuses some other random townie/scum and suddenly you come out of nowhere to defend him?
Huh kita? Mind explaining that to me?
lol I'm defending myself, not xfire. We aren't scum buddies.
On June 29 2013 01:44 gonzaw wrote: You are indeed getting too nervous for being the "cool 3P survivor that doesn't give a shit about the game"
Who said I don't care about the game? I certainly do care whether or not I win.
On June 29 2013 02:37 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2013 02:36 Crossfire99 wrote:On June 29 2013 02:35 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 29 2013 02:35 Crossfire99 wrote:On June 29 2013 02:34 Dandel Ion wrote:On June 29 2013 02:26 gonzaw wrote: This is important, because if we figure out Option 1 is real, then BC shouldn't shoot kita tonight, but rather Austin/Xata No, the shot needs to be on kita either way. Why? So we don't have to waste a lynch on him. We should rather kill scum than a survivor. He's scum-aligned survivor even if he is that, so it doesn't matter.
lol go away.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On June 29 2013 02:51 WaveofShadow wrote: I'm still with DI, I want kita dead. This game becomes infinitely easier to figure out once he is
Haha best reasoning ever.
If we just reach the endgame post, we can figure everything out!
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I volunteer to analyze myself! That tree is way too biased.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I'd like to put this out there: What if BC shot Meapak and provided a red check on geript, just to gain town cred and never get suspected? He loves to pull out the wild plans as scum so it is certainly something to consider.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I can't believe I didn't think of this until now.
WoS must be a redwood.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
FINALLY, SOMEONE THAT GETS IT.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
DON'T BC, YOU'RE THROWING THE GAME AWAY.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Why would you shoot the survivor when there are so many better options?
So bad.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Still makes more sense than your shot.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Does that mean I'm still alive?
Yay ^_^
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
You can say it as many times as you want, but it won't make it true.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
lol that bothered me as well. Obsessive compulsive buddies ftw!
|
|
|
|