PTP IV - Demon's Run - Page 6

On June 28 2013 09:52 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Geript. Are you mad I checked you?

On June 28 2013 20:31 Xatalos wrote:
If Kitaman27 actually is a Survivor, then I'm 99% certain that both austinmcc and Crossfire99 are scum. If he's just a scum though, only one of austinmcc/Crossfire99 is most likely scum.

Which one then.. Currently leaning more towards austinmcc. Here are some arguments speaking for austinmcc:

1) geript's filter is basically one big lie, since he's scum. With that in mind, there's no reason to believe that he was telling the truth about misreading the thread in a hurry and accidentally voting for sk8r instead of austinmcc. Now, one more vote would have been needed in addition to geript's to lynch austinmcc. BUT I can certainly see him, as the scum he was, making a panic decision and voting for sk8r, not willing to risk that some hero would show up during the last 10mins to get austinmcc lynched.

Normally a no-lynch would be very beneficial for scum, so it *could* also be just setting up a no-lynch to stall town. But if austinmcc was town, geript would also be scared of his potentially imba blue ability and somewhat likely want to kill him regardless. In addition, it would be much safer to just vote for austinmcc and avoid the suspicion raised by doing a stunt like he did there (if austinmcc was town, that is).

Conclusion: everything fits best if geript and austinmcc are scum together, but it's possible, although less likely, that geript merely wanted a no-lynch anyway (or he's telling the truth about his colossal failure, which I seriously doubt at this point).

2) austinmcc has played very differently compared to his townie playstyle. When I last played with him, he was a respected "leader" scumhunter, much like Gonzaw currently. This game he has mostly posted filler and setup speculation - very easy and non-draining topics for scum.

3) If geript and Kitaman27 are both scum, the scumteam would probably want one of them to remain as a "hidden scum". This fits with austinmcc being apparently very helpful, buddying and more active/townish lately.

4) Earlier cases and separate arguments by myself and others against austinmcc (see earlier posts).

5) I think I'm going to make a more exhaustive and "actual" case against austinmcc when I have more time and I get back to my computer.

On June 28 2013 23:39 gonzaw wrote:





If it's a lie, why isn't geript voting for kitaman?