also what actions should I explain? A lot of them probably don't have good explanations.
Smurf Mini Mafia - Page 10
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Let's play a game... | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
also what actions should I explain? A lot of them probably don't have good explanations. | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
Even though I dont have a lot of time I am in the thread a lot talking with you. I am not afraid to talk and PT is. | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
don't equate tryhard to towniness. | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
-just summary, no statement of who he think is scum. He randomly muses on if baker could be considered scummy. -Suddenly he votes HW then JP without talking about either beforehand. -Summarizes some shit HW did. Then says he's a good lynch. Note: only makes an argument against HW AFTER voting for him the previous day. -Votes ECC. This is the bus. The only reason he gives is "disappearance." Proceeds to disappear for the entire weekend. EXAMPLE: this is the only post that leads to an ECC vote. He never even says why he thinks ECC is scummy really. Just talks about a bunch of random unconnected shit: On June 06 2013 08:31 PTroughton2 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Less than enthused that there was nothing from Eccleston after his latest promise almost a day ago. The developments over the early part of this cycle lead me to believe that he is using the opportunity to not take part in discourse and remain in the shadows as Davison, who is arguably being the loudest, leads discussion away from him. Of course I appear to be in that same category but right now I'm trying to wrap my head around Davison's case. Tom's rebuttal reads incredibly townie and he has explained, at least to my own satisfaction, his thoughts on each of the points brought against him. Moreover, I am concerned that this case seeks to discredit Tom who was one of two people eyeing Davison for a potential lynch on D1. It seems the other was also one of his current scum reads: McGann. It may be just a coincidence, after all, and the game is dynamic after all, so I'll take a look at Davison's responses to those suspicions. Okay so that was in the period Davison was inactive and heading for replacement. Fair enough. I don't think I can attribute his read on Tom now to the things that Tom wrote about his slot earlier in the game, especially when those concerns over Davison were assuaged by McCoy: On June 03 2013 06:05 SMcCoy wrote: If we don't lynch JP the only guy I'll vote today will be HartnellWill, I've grown doubts about Davis cause of this post: This was right after DrT jumped onto the Trout wagon. If Davison is his scumbuddy, why would he try to disrupt the only way for DrT to save himself? Also, I think this post is really townie, although I don't agree with his conclusion since HW also made clear he would switch onto Trout: No Davis lynch please. I think we have a false positive here. The new Davison is loud and in your face and even though I feel he is incorrect about Tom here, I am having trouble placing a scum motive on this case when it can just be explained as a genuine misunderstanding or misinterpretation as shown by Tom's response. Davison, would you please flesh out what exactly it is about McGann you find scummy other than assocation with Tom, or have you reconsidered your renewed read on Eccleston in the face of his timely disappearance? ##Vote: Eccleston | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
its fucking obvious you are town. your level of tryhard at this point in the game is completely unnecessary for scum. if you were scum you would not be as active as you are being because there's no point. you will already have won. I don't get how I can prove I'm town to you. I can't elaborate on reasons that I didn't have. | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
| ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
You tryinghard ATM is a huge towntell because if you were scum you would not need to tryhard to win. PT is tryharding to appease you, carefully answering all your questions without trying to convince you of anything or engaging in conversation with you. I may be lazy so I'm not writing long shit, but I am tryharding to convince you to vote PT because a town win is so close but it all relies on your decision. | ||
Hurndall3
237 Posts
Early game: I was hella busy. Holy shit this town is uber tryhard and awesome. i really don't have anything of value to add with my limited time. Mid game: K town started sucking. I am totally going to put some time into this game, find the scumteam and impress everyone. After the game I'm going to be so proud to say who I really am and everyone will love me. After the HW mislynch: fuck i was wrong about everything. I suck. fuck this crapshoot of a game. fml Now: wow despite all my retardation town can still win. | ||
| ||