On May 30 2013 03:11 TheDavison wrote:
I'd like to bring attention to H3's posting, in reading and rereading the thread I found him less than useless. He has a fair number of posts and has been involved in discussion without adding anything to said discussion.

He blatantly sheeped an early case without adding anything to it and unvoted as soon as the casee responded. Since that moment he has been complaining about the difficulty of reading an all smurf game, which is the reason I've read the thread more than once, and hasn't added anything to the progression of day one discussion.

For now I find H3 the scummiest player in the thread and shall, therefore, vote for him. I ask each of you to either vote with me and tell me why yo agree with me or, if you are not voting with me, tell me why you disagree.

Vote:Hurndall

ok
##vote thedavison
pretty self explanatory imo. This is his first post!

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 29 2013 21:40 GMT

#79

smccvoy you exhibited wishy washiness. that means not having a strong opinion and giving reasons why someone could be town as well as scum.
it is commonly seen as a scum trait.
that is why we were suspicious of you. :

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 29 2013 21:43 GMT

#80

wow i have the best sig

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 29 2013 21:54 GMT

#81

um ok SMcCoy I tried to read your last post several times. Maybe my attention span is bad but half way through (between megacases 1 and 2) I kept getting so bored that I lot my concentration and had to start over. I still have no idea what you are trying to say but the gist I got was it was COMPLETELY INCONCLUSIVE lol. It's all analysis and no insight.

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 29 2013 22:18 GMT

#84

@ smcc that wasn't in response to your case against him. I hadn't read that yet.

@ms1 how Thedavidson jumped on me looked scummy. Obviously you try hards were yapping it up about nothing then he comes in with this case on the current "low hanging fruit" as his FIRST post. The case he made on me is newb like, but more importantly it is easy for scum to make. so it looked inauthentic.

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 30 2013 00:42 GMT

#87

can smcc's analysis be summarized for simpletons such as myself or can the complexity of the argument not be condensed?

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 30 2013 03:56 GMT

#100

I don't know what's going on with PT but I dont know why he's voting me or what argument he's sheeping.

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 30 2013 03:58 GMT

#101

also I still want someone to explain SIMPLY the case on DrTennant that everyone is sheeping.

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 30 2013 05:15 GMT

#103

1
"uscumbro?" is null possibly leaning town. I know you don't like it because of how it effectively accomplishes nothing, but town does it all the time.
2
people are searching for something to talk about early game. This is true of both town and scum.

DrTennant is not a scumread and I think there are already a bunch of better lynch candidates out there:

Eccleston
PTroughton2
JPertwee

Actually rereading all those filters I am gonna unvote TheDavison. His response to my OMGUS looks marginally genuine:

On May 30 2013 03:21 TheDavison wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

That is indeed my first post, I have been absent from the thread until now. Upon reading the thread I found you scummy. Instead of doing anything to refute that you have instead reinforced my belief that you are an alien monster who must be purged by our security forces.

##unvote

JPertwee might be a too scummy to be scum scenario. He is overly agreeable, wishy washy, and constantly asking people to expand on things they've said rather than contribute his own original thought.

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 30 2013 10:31 GMT

#106

you dont want to kill me with fire anymore?

Hurndall3

237 Posts

May 30 2013 13:53 GMT

#117

On May 30 2013 22:39 TheDavison wrote:
I shouldn't need to push it. If GM made sure that only reasonably good players got into this game making the original case and allowing other to draw their own conclusions should mean that I don't have to create the giant push onto H3 when instead I can simply show all of you why he is scum and you can decide whether to believe me or not.

This is a game where none of us, even you, can make people listen to them based on their names so each of us should be evaluating individual cases on a merit basis and I should not have to be in thread actively pushing for it to be considered. Because I could be anyone from Grush to Syllo I expect you to look into my cases as if they come form someone worth listening to.

If it wasn't my case that convinced you that H3 was scum what was it?

1 why are you assuming that gm was selective? I think he took every player that pmed him an /in.
2 are you convinced that I am scum? because I made a bunch of useless posts in the beginning? That case is terrible.