My basic argument on JJD was that he lurked more as mafia from his games, and I wasn't excusing him for stepping into a non-newbie game.

rayn - I'd had quite a bit to drink. So I wasn't very controlled in general last night.

Wave - I find GK exceptionally hard to read day 1, and probably in general. His style is pretty aloof and standoffish (how he writes, rather than how he is) so I find it difficult to discern sincerity in his posts.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:36 GMT

#756

On May 19 2013 05:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I'm here now mofo, so, tell me why did you call my play scummy?

say what? You're interrupting my Eurovision watching, bitch.

I called your absence scummy. I'm not sure what to make of you since you've been here, you're decisively calling a lot of people mafia. The reasons aren't terrible but I'm having problems being that decisive about anyone, let alone multiple peoples.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:37 GMT

#758

yamato, just a small point of order - in LVII, his mafia-buddy made a 100% scumslip, so literally you can't read anything into the fact he bussed him.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:39 GMT

#760

On May 19 2013 05:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
marv, i call people mafia for a reason, do you disagree with me?

that's the 'reasons aren't terrible' bit.

Like, take Dandel for example. you're outright calling him mafia for one post which may not be great, but is it really justified in being that decisive about?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:44 GMT

#763

If we take out the shit-fest that Dandel and I had, his posts since seem to be reasonably thought through and productive. Compare to ... uh... British Empire 2? where he just trolled a lot. Doesn't seem that similar to me.

I'm pretty obviously town to anyone who knows how I play, so I'm not going to entertain you on that one dear.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:45 GMT

#764

The weirdest thing about Dandel that I noticed is when he gave a bunch of names he could lynch, sputnik wasn't one of them, when it seemed he would fit on the list he made.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:47 GMT

#766

I do believe I just gave a reason

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:50 GMT

#769

There's nothing to elaborate on, it's written very clearly.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:51 GMT

#770

On May 19 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I also wanna know where i'm lurky (meta) as scum as GK proposes?

What do you think of GK marv?

I already gave my extremely non-committal read of GK.

Ask me better questions please, your current ones are boring and repetitive

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:54 GMT

#772

Actually, you're right about GK in this regard

On May 19 2013 02:25 goodkarma wrote:
EBWOP: Rayne also belongs in the lurker / should be vigi shot category too, except from what I've just seen glimpsing into some of his past games, he actually has been more active as town than he has as scum. So he might be a good lynch candidate today too (definitely better than JJD and Sputnik) if he continues to lurk.

Have you rolled scum apart from your newbie game?

If not, then this really is a complete fabrication.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:54 GMT

#773

oh you were scum in Hydra. Blast.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:55 GMT

#774

That still seems a super weak comparison though, especially given how active you were in your newbie game.

I'd like an explanation from GK on that one.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:56 GMT

#775

And my vote is on sputnik.

Apologies everyone for posting a bunch in a row :/

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 20:58 GMT

#778

On May 19 2013 05:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I can get on a sputnik lynch aswell. EASY!

lol. Somehow I have no idea whatsoever if what we've been talking about or done in this last page has been productive or not.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 21:31 GMT

#790

DP - I'm not so sure I like this WoS wagon anymore. What say you?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 21:35 GMT

#793

On May 19 2013 06:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
yo marv, WoS is town.

wasn't asking you, bitch <3

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 21:53 GMT

#799

On May 19 2013 06:45 VayneAuthority wrote:

Show nested quote +

I am being unsure of myself, but thats because im new to this whole lynch the fuck out of some one with PR roles still in play. I am doing my best.

vayne, can you explain this better to me please?

you've played twice on this forum before this game, where both times there was a lynch day 1, and there was no question of a no-lynch.

why are you so surprised about our eagerness to lynch on day 1 given your experiences on this forum so far?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 21:58 GMT

#806

Wave - I hosted goodkarma's first (I think?) newbie game, number 24.

In this game, in the first 2 days, town had massive problems with consolidation, despite it being plurality lynch. Votes were spread all over the place. Only on day 3 did GK understand the value of consolidation (even in plurality). So that point doesn't ring true to me, just because I know goodkarma was taught a serious lesson about consolidation. You can go read his filter from there, or perhaps you could read my post-game analysis there where I touch on the same things.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 18 2013 21:58 GMT

#807

On May 19 2013 06:56 VayneAuthority wrote:

Show nested quote +

I am more surprised about everyone jumping down my throat when I want to no lynch everytime so I am changing my playstyle so I am not a detriment to the town cause I want to win. does that make sense?

Did you claim you want to no-lynch in those games? I guess I'll have to go look for myself.