|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
My basic argument on JJD was that he lurked more as mafia from his games, and I wasn't excusing him for stepping into a non-newbie game.
rayn - I'd had quite a bit to drink. So I wasn't very controlled in general last night.
Wave - I find GK exceptionally hard to read day 1, and probably in general. His style is pretty aloof and standoffish (how he writes, rather than how he is) so I find it difficult to discern sincerity in his posts.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'm here now mofo, so, tell me why did you call my play scummy?
say what? You're interrupting my Eurovision watching, bitch.
I called your absence scummy. I'm not sure what to make of you since you've been here, you're decisively calling a lot of people mafia. The reasons aren't terrible but I'm having problems being that decisive about anyone, let alone multiple peoples.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
yamato, just a small point of order - in LVII, his mafia-buddy made a 100% scumslip, so literally you can't read anything into the fact he bussed him.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv, i call people mafia for a reason, do you disagree with me?
that's the 'reasons aren't terrible' bit.
Like, take Dandel for example. you're outright calling him mafia for one post which may not be great, but is it really justified in being that decisive about?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
If we take out the shit-fest that Dandel and I had, his posts since seem to be reasonably thought through and productive. Compare to ... uh... British Empire 2? where he just trolled a lot. Doesn't seem that similar to me.
I'm pretty obviously town to anyone who knows how I play, so I'm not going to entertain you on that one dear.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
The weirdest thing about Dandel that I noticed is when he gave a bunch of names he could lynch, sputnik wasn't one of them, when it seemed he would fit on the list he made.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I do believe I just gave a reason
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
There's nothing to elaborate on, it's written very clearly.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: I also wanna know where i'm lurky (meta) as scum as GK proposes?
What do you think of GK marv?
I already gave my extremely non-committal read of GK.
Ask me better questions please, your current ones are boring and repetitive
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Actually, you're right about GK in this regard
On May 19 2013 02:25 goodkarma wrote: EBWOP: Rayne also belongs in the lurker / should be vigi shot category too, except from what I've just seen glimpsing into some of his past games, he actually has been more active as town than he has as scum. So he might be a good lynch candidate today too (definitely better than JJD and Sputnik) if he continues to lurk.
Have you rolled scum apart from your newbie game?
If not, then this really is a complete fabrication.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
oh you were scum in Hydra. Blast.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
That still seems a super weak comparison though, especially given how active you were in your newbie game.
I'd like an explanation from GK on that one.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
And my vote is on sputnik.
Apologies everyone for posting a bunch in a row :/
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 05:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: I can get on a sputnik lynch aswell. EASY!
lol. Somehow I have no idea whatsoever if what we've been talking about or done in this last page has been productive or not.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
DP - I'm not so sure I like this WoS wagon anymore. What say you?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 06:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: yo marv, WoS is town.
wasn't asking you, bitch <3
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 06:45 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Vayne, i do not think your case is good. At all. One point why you call him suspicious: Suspicious. sums up the thread (completely useless) and then says he will just be waiting to see what happens, probably so he can drop a vote on the bandwagon late at night. A pretty mediocre read, so ill just keep an eye on him for now.
Can you see what you are doing? I am being unsure of myself, but thats because im new to this whole lynch the fuck out of some one with PR roles still in play. I am doing my best.
vayne, can you explain this better to me please?
you've played twice on this forum before this game, where both times there was a lynch day 1, and there was no question of a no-lynch.
why are you so surprised about our eagerness to lynch on day 1 given your experiences on this forum so far?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Wave - I hosted goodkarma's first (I think?) newbie game, number 24.
In this game, in the first 2 days, town had massive problems with consolidation, despite it being plurality lynch. Votes were spread all over the place. Only on day 3 did GK understand the value of consolidation (even in plurality). So that point doesn't ring true to me, just because I know goodkarma was taught a serious lesson about consolidation. You can go read his filter from there, or perhaps you could read my post-game analysis there where I touch on the same things.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 06:56 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 06:53 marvellosity wrote:On May 19 2013 06:45 VayneAuthority wrote:On May 19 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Vayne, i do not think your case is good. At all. One point why you call him suspicious: Suspicious. sums up the thread (completely useless) and then says he will just be waiting to see what happens, probably so he can drop a vote on the bandwagon late at night. A pretty mediocre read, so ill just keep an eye on him for now.
Can you see what you are doing? I am being unsure of myself, but thats because im new to this whole lynch the fuck out of some one with PR roles still in play. I am doing my best. vayne, can you explain this better to me please? you've played twice on this forum before this game, where both times there was a lynch day 1, and there was no question of a no-lynch. why are you so surprised about our eagerness to lynch on day 1 given your experiences on this forum so far? I am more surprised about everyone jumping down my throat when I want to no lynch everytime so I am changing my playstyle so I am not a detriment to the town cause I want to win. does that make sense?
Did you claim you want to no-lynch in those games? I guess I'll have to go look for myself.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On May 19 2013 07:01 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 06:58 marvellosity wrote: Wave - I hosted goodkarma's first (I think?) newbie game, number 24.
In this game, in the first 2 days, town had massive problems with consolidation, despite it being plurality lynch. Votes were spread all over the place. Only on day 3 did GK understand the value of consolidation (even in plurality). So that point doesn't ring true to me, just because I know goodkarma was taught a serious lesson about consolidation. You can go read his filter from there, or perhaps you could read my post-game analysis there where I touch on the same things. Alright I suppose I can understand this then...sort of....but then why question it yourself at the same time I did?
there's a reason i didn't make a case of it, dear.
|
|
|
|