EPTOn May 30 2013 06:18 Blazinghand wrote:
Oh sorry marv, how thoughtless of me: the only good veteran.
Oh sorry marv, how thoughtless of me: the only good veteran.
why are you randomly being a complete prick? just curious
[M][N] Les Mafia - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why are you randomly being a complete prick? just curious | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 30 2013 06:19 Blazinghand wrote: I'm just mad that I misplayed and got mislynched  pfft, fine. the problem was no-one was good and no-one carried town when they needed carrying. s0lstice and grush randomly piling on GK at the end of the last day was really frustrating. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
The hits on Spicy and Stutters were kinda surreal to me :p | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
"scum KP is fixed at 1" actually mafia vigilante is scum KP, so it quite clearly wasn't fixed at 1. that was an outright lie :x | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 31 2013 09:57 Blazinghand wrote: Not sure if that was Marv's writing originally, I think he's quoting a guide from mafiascum's wiki or maybe a TL Guide. I've definitely heard that passage before. It's from the WIFOM section from the mafiascum wiki. It's actually one of their better pages, because one of the things it stresses is that things people all too readily dismiss stuff as WIFOM that isn't really WIFOM. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 31 2013 04:29 Blazinghand wrote: Survivor is an okay role, but I don't think it needs extra powers to be balanced or interesting. Survivor is what we economists call a pro-cyclical role, where if the economy is in recession it contributes to recession, whereas if the economy is in boom it contributes to the boom. Survivor will help whoever is winning, making the game more swingy. Contrast SK, who will help whoever is losing. I like this a lot too. Good thought about that role. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 04 2013 06:01 Blazinghand wrote: I did that a week ago, and coming back, I still feel like I need to learn or teach a lesson from this. You don't improve (or rather, I don't improve) by letting things go. I improve by finding out my mistakes and not repeating them. The long and short of it is this; it was about 48 hours between the time you said you were going to search for mafia and when you actually looked for mafia. You did look pretty townie when you looked for mafia, yes. But you left it too late that there existed a very real possibility (in my mind) that you'd put it off for so long so you could just make one enormous effort to stave off your lynch, and that also you could gauge town reactions. My gut call towards the end of day 2 was that you were town, but my gut's been plenty wrong before, and given the slip + 48hour scumhunting gap, I didn't have the confidence to move the lynch elsewhere. If you say you're going to scumhunt on Sunday evening and you only produce something Tuesday evening despite multiple promise in between, it smells. Even after you argued with DP on Sunday evening, you had Monday to do shit, and you did nothing that day either despite repeatedly promising to. If you're short of time then don't promise shit you can't deliver... | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it was like this empty day as far as you were concerned where you made some posts but they were all excusing prior play or promising future play. When it came to Tuesday evening + (2nd half of day 2) the 'goodwill' (terrible word, but you get the gist) had gone and I couldn't excuse myself not lynching you at that point. Obviously it wasn't great play from me because you were town, but also factor in that i'm not stupid and i'm pretty decent and that's the position that *I* felt you had put me in | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 04 2013 06:10 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah I mean there's not really much to say other than that I don't see a that much of a scum motive for waiting 24 hours to dump out a specific group of reads. Obviously giving town less time to evaluate your reads is good for scum if you can pull it off, but if you're 100% set to be lynched it almost doesn't matter when you say what you say unless you're really trying to not get lynched. The 24 hour gap between the scumslip argument with DP and me beginning my stuff should have been filled with me stating I was busy for those 24 hours. That being said, I get the feeling that someone who's 100% on the chopping block stating they're busy for the first half of the day doesn't really earn them much credit, but if it's true, it's better to say it than to not say it, or at least it's better to update the thread on when activity can be expected. I made a post at some point which had about 6 or so of your quotes all saying you were scumhunting imminently, where nothing had come the scum motive is that you're putting off having to contribute, and you're sensing who the thread wants to lynch before making your play i'd have been far less inclined to lynch you if you hadn't kept saying that the cases were coming soon and then they didn't come soon. I know you're not one to bring real life into games, but i'd much rather you said "i can't do x until this time"... which WILL look dodgy, but it will look a lot less dodgy than how what you did came across | ||
| ||
