On April 07 2013 07:37 Palmar wrote:
That is to say, taken at face value and assuming WoS is actually as derpy as he came across in his first few posts, it's unlikely he is scum based on the stance he took towards his own death. However if he is actually somewhat competent at scum play, what he did is not a terrible last-ditch attempt to get away from the guillotine.

yes it is quite clearly one or the other.

---------------------------------

i still want to kill prplhz. has weak reasoning with his votes and he sheds all responsibility with his vote stating he clearly didn't even bother to read at all and is just sheeping others. Peopele react to his shityness comes back and says he "understands it better". Seems like to me prplhz dosnt give a shit about his vote and that is scummy.

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 06 2013 23:22 GMT

#662

it goes against all my principals but i may be willing to lynch rayn just so i dont have to see him post anymore.

+ Show Spoiler +

jk jk

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 06 2013 23:31 GMT

#665

On April 07 2013 08:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Show nested quote +

Who do you want to lynch for real? Or is it me?

see this is part of the problem if you cant tell who i want to lynch for real i simply don't get you.

CAN YOU READ

i just said prplhz

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 06 2013 23:39 GMT

#670

it pretty clear that wos didn't claim anything ace

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 06 2013 23:43 GMT

#677

it has no end ace

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 06 2013 23:49 GMT

#688

On April 07 2013 08:49 Ace wrote:

Show nested quote +

herp derp so if WoS never claimed, and you know this why are you voting for sciberbia when you know someone else lied?

wat

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 06 2013 23:56 GMT

#693

wos "claim what" implies he didn't have anything to claim i think that is pretty clear.

You are the one who brought up the claim stuff ace

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 07 2013 00:00 GMT

#696

On April 07 2013 08:58 Ace wrote:

Show nested quote +

@marv: What else could "I already did" refer to? If I'm looking at this wrong then honestly, show me a different interpretation.

@iamp: If he didn't have anything to claim then why would he say he already did?

because there was nothing in all of his other posts about a claim. Therefore he claims nothing.

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 07 2013 00:03 GMT

#697

back in hour or so

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 07 2013 00:07 GMT

#699

On April 07 2013 09:04 Ace wrote:
??? He was at L-1 before an unvote and was ready to die - how do you get a null claim from that post in that situation rather than he was just lying about claiming or forgot to? You don't think that someone about to be lynched would claim in that spot to save his life?

who are you talking to?

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 07 2013 00:09 GMT

#701

im saying he made no claim ace.

iamperfection

United States9645 Posts

April 07 2013 00:13 GMT

#706

On April 07 2013 09:11 Ace wrote:
I don't know, maybe I'm not good at explaining my thoughts here. I completely understand he made no claim. He said he did. Which is why I asked right after for him to point it out to me. Does this part make sense?

no

i took it as this

you say show me your claim

wos goes" wtf are you talking about i didnt claim anything"

thats what i get from the "what claim"