EPTEgo Mini Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
Go! :> | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 01:17 WaveofShadow wrote: Oh hai guise. Just finished an exam, did well on another and I'm feelin' gooooooooood. SO whass all this I come back to? Errrboddy got a scum read on me yet nobody wants to throw a vote over this way, huh? K. Hai Oats. It's a pleasure to be in a game with you finally. Apparently Marv's vote on Ace was a joke and some sort of bait into seeing if he could get anyone else to vote with him so he could name them scummy? Or something? He calls Rayn looney but agrees with his horribly bad analysis of my 3 posts...not sure why such a seemingly solid player is associating himself with a read like that but anyway....do YOU have a read on me or any opinion regarding Ace? Tell me why you think the analysis is horrible. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 02:13 sciberbia wrote: Any thoughts on what I said about Oats? Agree/disagree with my points? Do you guys think he is scum? Read this (or a couple of pages at least) and get back to me with your opinion on Oats. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 02:20 Palmar wrote: so we've established everyone is town except sciberbia and WoS? I found this too funny. Don't know why. Anyway I'll talk about shit properly later, I'm kinda just watching for now. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 04:49 prplhz wrote: can anybody tell me why axlegreaser is town Can you actually properly tell me why he isn't? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 00:39 Oatsmaster wrote: Am I not making myself clear? Im reading it as we kill this guy day 1 and only day 1 because he is a good lynch on day 1. Like day 1 as in generally, not specifically. DOES IT NOT READ LIKE THAT TO YOU? I'd say (and I'm pretty sure Oats would confirm this) that I'm the player he fears most in case he rolls mafia, and he's not afraid to rile me up. I see no particular reason he should be mafia right now | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
prplhz has been pretty shit so far. He starts off with some random read on Axle, and then asks the thread if Axle is usually a 'dwerp' or whatever dumbass word he used. prplhz bloody played with Axle before in LIX. He even shared a QT with him because they were both mafia, where Axle was pretty Axle-y. He should have an idea about how he plays, and yet he's playing dumb. Further he pops into the thread 1.5 hours ago to ask why Axle is town, but he doesn't bother sticking around to talk to anyone around it. prplhz is null leaning a bit scum to me right now. He could just be being shit. This is eminently possible. Oh yeah, you were talking about his rayn stuff. Don't really read too much into it tbh. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 19:30 Palmar wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Sciberbia I think this is the direction I want to go in. Can you explain it to me nice because I really want to lynch someone else right now. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote: I already thought he didn't look very good, then I very much did not like his big post on Oats/Iamp. Maybe I'm insane here, but I really don't think it's reasonable to push oats at the moment. Also sciberbia has a few of those indirect question things I don't really like, I mentioned it in my first post against him, this validation seeking thing. Alright. You don't realise this because I've kept my cards close to my chest so far this game, but I agree completely with everything you've said about the people I'm suspicious of. I agree about the big post on oats/iamp. He spent several paragraphs defending iamp when he only had one serious detractor at the time (DP) and I didn't find the push on Oats very reasonable either (maybe you can guess this from my reaction). Also agreed with the validation thing - talking about setup is fine, except he kinda didn't even really give an opinion, he was just fawning at you. The problem I have is that what you picked out from WoS about his town-claim is exactly what I picked out (and incidentally made me feel much better about YOUR alignment). I find it bizarre as shit that you're the only one to mention it in those terms actually. Just to repeat for anyone who's not me & Palmar: On April 05 2013 09:21 WaveofShadow wrote: Phew. Real happy I rolled town this time around; I feel really bad for whoever is on my scumteam when I roll mafia for the first time. It felt disgusting to me, and I've not actually been able to stop thinking about it all game. It's been like the main thing in my head. Because it doesn't take very long, I went back and had a look at the opening of all WoS's games yesterday. He's always rolled town, and he's never mentioned his alignment in his opening post in any of the games he's played here so far. So in this game, he rolls town for the... 6th? time or so, and for some reason, in this game, he decides to tell us that he's town, and worse talks about feeling bad if he rolls mafia. I don't understand the mentality here at all if he's town. He's rolled town again as per usual, and for some reason this time decides to tell us that at some point he'll be shit as mafia? What? I could write more about WoS and flesh out the case if it's really necessary. Suffice to say (and basically what Palmar/Tunkeg) have said, nothing he's said or done since has alleviated the feelings I got from this first post. I think he's a better lynch than sciberbia. ##Vote: WaveOfShadow | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36157 Posts
On April 06 2013 19:54 Palmar wrote: iamp doesn't look too bad honestly. But I don't think Oats does either. They both look fine. And it's not that iamp does or doesn't look fine that's even the point about that post. I didn't really see the need to spend half of his first major analysis defending someone who didn't need defending. And I think Oats is town. So *shrug* | ||
| ||
