On April 29 2013 08:33 ObviousOne wrote:
I have the wit of a fox and the reflexes of a mongoose, but I am as bright as the NumLock LED on the average keyboard.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 28 2013 23:57 GMT

#2745

On April 29 2013 08:51 TheRavensName wrote:

Show nested quote +

Rohan needs a little proof before it rides to Gondor.

oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[image loading]

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:01 GMT

#2750

On April 29 2013 08:59 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

Your annoyance I could foresee, you did not expect to have to deal with this today.

You say I am not town, well let us fight then, to the death.

BloodyC0bbler

I hereby challenge you to a duel to the death. We will fight today, from sunrise to sunset. The field of honour will be this very thread.

The ammunition, our words, the weapons their votes.

One will walk, one will hang.

Your move.

funny as a role like this was in my setup for CC

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:09 GMT

#2752

doesn't ring a bell, what is the "or else"?

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:13 GMT

#2754

oh ok. thats somewhat the role I had included too. fun role.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:14 GMT

#2755

BC ignore Palmar for now. I've got my sights on yamato and VE. where are yours?

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:20 GMT

#2757

stutters is vigi food, or should have been last night. we probably dont have too many since a number of "need to be dead people are alive". yamato needs to die.

what about VE makes him 3p but not scum?

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:22 GMT

#2760

?? I already named them

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 00:26 GMT

#2764

On April 29 2013 09:22 BloodyC0bbler wrote:

Show nested quote +

VE is normally (in my experiences that i remember) much less involved at all as scum. He appears primarily to defend himself and make "phantom" activity. Given the fact he has debated/argued lynch choices and was one of the major people actually attempting to force discussion of lynches during d2 I just can't see him as mafia. However his play currently is similar to his town play and is slightly similar to his play in storm as 3p.

That is actually how I would characterize his play. His "activity" in day 2 consisted of me trying to show him how ShoaPi
s wagon was potentially bad, and he mostated a few things in how events went down. He was completely lost in how we got to those 2 being lynched. He was overly defensive and paranoid up to the clarity flip. re-read day 2 from when shiaopi arrives up to clarity flip.

I dont see how that sequence can be considered his Town play. His day 1 is just nonsense.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:06 GMT

#2780

is that a real claim palmar. lol @ cc. he got rb'd N1. read plz.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:08 GMT

#2784

that isnt an actual explanation Palmar

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:13 GMT

#2791

its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.

If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.

## vote Palmar

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:17 GMT

#2797

On April 29 2013 10:14 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

okay, you're bad and should feel bad.

you're a cop, had got masoned, didn't post in the mason QT and didn't even think to investigate the guy you were masoned with? if you didnt trust him enough to post in the QT then where is the sense in checking BC out? explain.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:31 GMT

#2813

no, we aren't lynching syl. There is stupidity going on right now.

CC - I dont know why you checked Shiao Night 1. That is a major stretch that you check him, he gets brought up, temp cleared, and then you check sylencia. thats 2 lurkers who have no impact on the game that you checked. not buying it. especially since you just claimed, without counter claiming Palmar. If you believe Palmar is a Cop there is no point in claiming right now as you'd let BC die with your vote. If you dont believe him, you vote him off. Claiming right now to add another suspect in the pool is nonsense. its not even been an hour since your case on sylencia - you could have pushed it ot let it marinate more. Your urgency shows little thinking here.

Lastly, you also can not confirm your check. Shiao hasn't flipped. We've got 2 Cops, both unconfirmed claiming results on the same day within an hour of each other. Both that also appeared on the infamous Oats wagon analysis.

bullshit. one of you is definitely lying and both of you made a bad play here.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:34 GMT

#2818

Sharrant dont vote syl yet. Look at those detective checks. Why would he investigate those 2 and claim when he is unconfirmed? he just made a case on sylencia - what is the rush? Palmar's claim should cause him to NOT claim if he is a real detective.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:35 GMT

#2820

On April 29 2013 10:34 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

lol Ace

we ARE lynching sylencia. absolute worst case scenario is CC is scum and we lynch townies for 2 days before lynching or vigging CC in return, leaving us with plenty of townies and like 2 mafia left. something like 11 townies maybe?

You're crazy if you don't lynch sylencia.

you claimed cop, couldn't even substantiate it, voted to lynch BC off and are now going against that check to vote another unconfirmed cop's suspect off. you aren't this bad. stop it.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:42 GMT

#2830

On April 29 2013 10:37 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Ace, are you stupid?

ShaioPi is probably town -- you said it yourself yesterday. Of course, it's not confirmed. I'll give you that. My checks are real, though. Why else would I go through all the effort to suddenly make a case on Syl out of no where? We might have two cops -- either Palmar is the Insane/paranoid cop and I'm the sane one, or he's lying and he's being suicidal.

Lynch Sylencia today. Was I supposed to let us lynch BC knowing full well that I'm the alignment cop with a guilty check on Syl? And that Palmar, if cop, is probably insane/paranoid? Bullshit.

even if you assume Shiaoi is Town there is 0 reason to claim right now. Palmar is already leading a lynch to BC. whether you believe him or not you are under 0 pressure. And that is the biigest reason I dont believe you.

because in a game with possible 3rd parties and scum KP if you're a real cop you wouldn't claim. You know your chances of dying are high tonight. You didn't even attempt to refute Palmar's claim and bought it at face value. We can only lynch 1 person at a time - why would you claim so quickly after another unconfirmed cop did? You are absolutely sure it must be syl that is guilty but have no inclination towards a Palmar/BC resolution. Why?

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:46 GMT

#2835

its really a matter of which one of these 2 is more rotten, and its possible both are.

the pool of Palmar, VE, yamato, and now Mr.CC stinks. I dont believe both Palmar and Mr.CC can be so dumb as to not think their claims and current game situation out. Not buying it.

Ace

United States16096 Posts

April 29 2013 01:48 GMT

#2837

On April 29 2013 10:45 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Why would Palmar fakeclaim cop right now if what I don't understand if he's mafia.

have you been reading this game? Look at my post referring to Palmar's Cop claim.

There are a bunch of people being lazy and not playing this game seriously. I dont believe every single one of you are skating by on the lazy town excuse.