|
On April 29 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
HAHA oh man. This is awesome. Except which cop are you? I'm going to assume alignment since you wouldn't have a parity check yet since you were blocked N1. Now if you're alignment cop a guilty check doesn't mean shit yet since you could be any sanity.
Man I wish I could believe you though since I have a hard time believing we'd have more than two millers on town just in case he tried to claim. Wat do?
I'm professor trelawney, who was known to be perfectly sane and such.
|
On April 29 2013 10:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar I just have to say your check doesn't mean shit until you get another check... =\
or until we flip the cobbler.
|
On April 29 2013 10:10 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar I just have to say your check doesn't mean shit until you get another check... =\
would you really miss him that much?
|
On April 29 2013 10:13 Ace wrote:
its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.
If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.
## vote Palmar
okay, you're bad and should feel bad.
|
On April 29 2013 10:15 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:10 Palmar wrote:On April 29 2013 10:09 WaveofShadow wrote:
HAHA oh man. This is awesome. Except which cop are you? I'm going to assume alignment since you wouldn't have a parity check yet since you were blocked N1. Now if you're alignment cop a guilty check doesn't mean shit yet since you could be any sanity.
Man I wish I could believe you though since I have a hard time believing we'd have more than two millers on town just in case he tried to claim. Wat do? I'm professor trelawney, who was known to be perfectly sane and such. Question, did you crumb?
never have, never will
|
On April 29 2013 10:15 WaveofShadow wrote:
Palmar honestly, wtf. What is your goal here? Do you honestly expect people to follow along with you when you riled everyone up and promised some epic war with epic words and arguments, and then deliver this?
It's like we just had sex for the first time and I left disappointed because you only lasted 8 seconds.
yeah sorry, but I just cba.
I actually had a half-edited declaration of war on bloodycobbler in a notepad, but really just don't have the energy to argue with everyone.
|
On April 29 2013 10:17 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:14 Palmar wrote:On April 29 2013 10:13 Ace wrote:
its fake. If you knew Oats was innocent you'd be more interested to stop the lynch on him, especially if you believe someone else, like say yamato was scummier. You also appear on Oats' wagon twice - if you knew he was innocent you wouldnt even have voted.
If you get a guilty result on BC with only 1 check, with no way to confirm sanity you're just hoping we're all dumb enough to buy it at face value. Fake claim + your day 1 actions dont match.
## vote Palmar
okay, you're bad and should feel bad. you're a cop, had got masoned, didn't post in the mason QT and didn't even think to investigate the guy you were masoned with? if you didnt trust him enough to post in the QT then where is the sense in checking BC out? explain.
I'm a cop
Got masoned
Got bored of the mason QT
Didn't see the reason to investigate him, he looked somewhat town, yet not confirmed enough for me to outright claim.
I trusted him well enough to post in the QT, I just didn't.
|
as in, I would have posted reads and everything, but kept my role back.
the closest thing I left as a crumb is the "reasons best left unexplained" about my apathy towards the oats lynch. Who I thought was pretty likely to flip town by the end of the day (my early suspicions on him were genuine).
|
On April 29 2013 10:22 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:20 Palmar wrote:
as in, I would have posted reads and everything, but kept my role back.
the closest thing I left as a crumb is the "reasons best left unexplained" about my apathy towards the oats lynch. Who I thought was pretty likely to flip town by the end of the day (my early suspicions on him were genuine). I'm not sure how that was a crumb. If he had been lynched after you could have checked him, sure. But still man...
I don't crumb. I never do.
|
ok I'm willing to sheep Cheese's lynch, they can't rb both of us, it's great!
|
one of us is definitely not sane btw, since there are more than one.
you're either insane or sane. I doubt you're scum because even 2 mislynches aren't that good for mafia if we get 1 scum in return.
|
(the two mislynches being sylencia flips town, you say "oh I must be insane" and then shiaopi flips town)
|
? yes I could be insane, sane or paranoid.
cheesecake is definitely insane or sane, and just based on the fact I've always thought shiaopi was town, I'm going to guess sane. So it's likely I'm either insane or paranoid, as 2 cops sounds like a handful for mafia to handle.
So we lynch sylencia, that confirms cc's sanity, meanwhile since he's either insane or sane he'll get guaranteed checks, mafia has to shoot or rb him, so I might get another check off.
|
On April 29 2013 10:28 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hell. I didn't want to claim but fuck I guess I have to now that Palmar is being retarded if he really is another cop.
I'm an Alignment Cop
NIGHT 1 = SHIAOPI INNOCENT
NIGHT 2 = SYLENCIA GUILTY
I wanted to lynch ShaioPi yesterday because I didn't know his alignment despite my check. It would help confirm my sanity. I now know that I cannot be paranoid or naiive, so I'm sane or insane. I'm going to trust Shia is town based on yesterdays events. I am SANE. Sylencia is mafia.
I didn't think I'd have to claim today if I could just case Syl T.T This seems pretty reasonable. I will be voting Sylencia. Palmar Who did you try and check on N1?
BC
|
BC is completely unreadable because he's always useless as town and still very hard to lynch except on day 1 as any alignment. I really wanted it out of the way.
|
On April 29 2013 10:31 Ace wrote:
no, we aren't lynching syl. There is stupidity going on right now.
CC - I dont know why you checked Shiao Night 1. That is a major stretch that you check him, he gets brought up, temp cleared, and then you check sylencia. thats 2 lurkers who have no impact on the game that you checked. not buying it. especially since you just claimed, without counter claiming Palmar. If you believe Palmar is a Cop there is no point in claiming right now as you'd let BC die with your vote. If you dont believe him, you vote him off. Claiming right now to add another suspect in the pool is nonsense. its not even been an hour since your case on sylencia - you could have pushed it ot let it marinate more. Your urgency shows little thinking here.
Lastly, you also can not confirm your check. Shiao hasn't flipped. We've got 2 Cops, both unconfirmed claiming results on the same day within an hour of each other. Both that also appeared on the infamous Oats wagon analysis.
bullshit. one of you is definitely lying and both of you made a bad play here.
lol Ace
we ARE lynching sylencia. absolute worst case scenario is CC is scum and we lynch townies for 2 days before lynching or vigging CC in return, leaving us with plenty of townies and like 2 mafia left. something like 11 townies maybe?
You're crazy if you don't lynch sylencia.
|
On April 29 2013 10:33 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:30 Palmar wrote:On April 29 2013 10:28 Sharrant wrote:On April 29 2013 10:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hell. I didn't want to claim but fuck I guess I have to now that Palmar is being retarded if he really is another cop.
I'm an Alignment Cop
NIGHT 1 = SHIAOPI INNOCENT
NIGHT 2 = SYLENCIA GUILTY
I wanted to lynch ShaioPi yesterday because I didn't know his alignment despite my check. It would help confirm my sanity. I now know that I cannot be paranoid or naiive, so I'm sane or insane. I'm going to trust Shia is town based on yesterdays events. I am SANE. Sylencia is mafia.
I didn't think I'd have to claim today if I could just case Syl T.T This seems pretty reasonable. I will be voting Sylencia. Palmar Who did you try and check on N1? BC Well, if nothing else that part of your story is believable. I think that it's funny that your "attempting to play awful" gave me a strong town read on you though.
Well I tried to establish myself as town on day 1 without being a threat to the mafia. I honestly think they might have shot me night 1 though anyway ^^
|
On April 29 2013 10:34 Ace wrote:
Sharrant dont vote syl yet. Look at those detective checks. Why would he investigate those 2 and claim when he is unconfirmed? he just made a case on sylencia - what is the rush? Palmar's claim should cause him to NOT claim if he is a real detective.
he panicked, who cares?
people play like shit occasionally, I just made a premature claim because I'm lazy. Stop with the nonsense.
|
On April 29 2013 10:35 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2013 10:34 Palmar wrote:On April 29 2013 10:31 Ace wrote:
no, we aren't lynching syl. There is stupidity going on right now.
CC - I dont know why you checked Shiao Night 1. That is a major stretch that you check him, he gets brought up, temp cleared, and then you check sylencia. thats 2 lurkers who have no impact on the game that you checked. not buying it. especially since you just claimed, without counter claiming Palmar. If you believe Palmar is a Cop there is no point in claiming right now as you'd let BC die with your vote. If you dont believe him, you vote him off. Claiming right now to add another suspect in the pool is nonsense. its not even been an hour since your case on sylencia - you could have pushed it ot let it marinate more. Your urgency shows little thinking here.
Lastly, you also can not confirm your check. Shiao hasn't flipped. We've got 2 Cops, both unconfirmed claiming results on the same day within an hour of each other. Both that also appeared on the infamous Oats wagon analysis.
bullshit. one of you is definitely lying and both of you made a bad play here. lol Ace we ARE lynching sylencia. absolute worst case scenario is CC is scum and we lynch townies for 2 days before lynching or vigging CC in return, leaving us with plenty of townies and like 2 mafia left. something like 11 townies maybe? You're crazy if you don't lynch sylencia. you claimed cop, couldn't even substantiate it, voted to lynch BC off and are now going against that check to vote another unconfirmed cop's suspect off. you aren't this bad. stop it.
Not going against my check, it's simple statistics.
I know I'm paranoid, insane or sane. If I lynch BC and he flips scum I'm paranoid or sane if he flips town I'm insane or paranoid, neither case concludes my sanity.
however CC's check is on someone I have a strong townread on as town, and he has one of each, so we know he's not naive or paranoid.
Best case: he's sane, we kill scum
almost as good: he's insane, I'm wrong, we kill townie today and get scum tomorrow. There's 15v3v1 likely alive today, so that means we lynch scum tomorrow and end up in like 10v2v1 on day 5
worst case: he's scum, we lynch townies two days in a row and end up in 7v2v1 on day 6, which is still very, very winnable.
expanding worst case:
now: 15-3-1
lynch 14-3-1
2kills 12-3-1
lynch 11-3-1
2kills 9-3-1
lynch 9-2-1
2kills 7-2-1
|
On April 29 2013 10:46 Ace wrote:
its really a matter of which one of these 2 is more rotten, and its possible both are.
the pool of Palmar, VE, yamato, and now Mr.CC stinks. I dont believe both Palmar and Mr.CC can be so dumb as to not think their claims and current game situation out. Not buying it.
Ace being Ace.
We're lynching Sylencia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
