|
On April 24 2013 06:17 Clarity_nl wrote:I had four hours, you guys just can't read my posts and are making stuff up. I was caught up with the thread when I made the case, I didn't say I thought I looked bad I said I felt guilty. Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 11:39 Clarity_nl wrote:On April 23 2013 11:34 Bill Murray wrote:On April 23 2013 10:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
I am here now and catching up, did not expect this game to start so soon, sorry. one hour later has read the entire game and made a case on sharrant? his case is really tunnely, and reaching, as well FoS Clarity Yeah okay I might have started reading and then figured I would read the last two pages and see palmar talking about possibly being the hammervote so figured I'd show my face. interested why you think my case is reaching, though. This refers to me saying that I'm here now, not my case post. and because I posted that I felt obliged to post some original thoughts, and I felt on a dealine cause it was 5 am. In fact my case post starts with saying I have no clue about oats.
because i feel like you just filtered him, didn't read anything in context, and that indicates you have a scum agenda
|
oats pushes for his replacement in a post
clarity shows up
He was "reading the last two pages" "mistakenly" seeing Palmar say there was a hammer? If he's catching up, why is he flittering around? Makes no sense in general. Instead, I would point you towards it being a sign of active lurking, and him not wanting to be replaced.
His case on Sharrant takes a reaching standpoint when it attacks him for questioning yamato and oats, the two main wagons of the day. Why is questioning them a bad thing? Clarity spins it as such...
I don't feel like he read the thread in that 50 minutes, plus filtered Sharrant, plus got all those quotes, plus responded to them all
Seems like scum that doesn't have to read... didn't respond to any of the events... responded to a filtered reaction of them. You see there is a miller claim, supposedly, but you have no thoughts on it? Any town would say "oh he was kidding" or "i thought he was being serious"... "Hes miller" "Hes scum" whatever
Blame the late entrance?
Blame Palmar?
Who else is he going to blame?
|
On April 24 2013 07:22 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2013 07:20 Bill Murray wrote:On April 24 2013 07:02 Vivax wrote:
The explanation doesn't add up at all.
Starts reading -> Says I'm here after 2h-> case after 1 h -> BM calls him out saying the case is bad and made in just one hour -> Clarity answers "Yeah well I figured I'd say hi after seeing that I didn't post anything -> Vivax calls him out again for quick case -> Clarity: "Yeah well I actually read for 3 hours."
Why does he answer to BM, talking about clarity's case being bad and the short time (second post), with a justification for his entrance post (first post)?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Clarity could have replied, as town: "I actually read for 3 hours, so what's your problem with my case?"
But Clarity was scared that his case looked scummy cause of BM's reaction, so he instead posted a justification for his late entrance, which he knew looked bad, and felt guilty for. And he didn't want to correct BM in saying that he read for so long precisely cause he'd have had less justification to explain the bad case.
Now that he's being pressured for the short time in which the case was written, he gives another justification where he actually claims that he was reading for a longer time.
When BM pressured him, he wanted to make it look like he made something in haste by arguing that he wanted to post before the hammer.
Now that it's exactly the point against him, he says that he was actually reading for a longer time. he's lying he claims he read the thread in an hour. try reading 50 pages in an hour. Drazak/Clarity have both spent about the same time "catching up" if you notice - around 45 minutes to an hour - which is long enough to coordinate with scum, but not really determine what is going on in the thread READ MY FUCKING POSTS DIPSHIT
not only am i reading them, but i'm reading them in context. notice how i posted MY post on you ELEVEN minutes after? Yeah... I didn't even get to read a page in that time.... and I'm a fast reader
|
On April 23 2013 16:08 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 15:53 Bill Murray wrote:
so i'm actually not going to vote clarity... im going to vote sharrant I mean, you actually voted yamato in the voting thread, but okay.
i was wondering who would notice this. funny it was you. way to sling mud. add that to your lying.
|
On April 24 2013 07:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
BM the point here is he later on said he actually read for three hours. He either lied to you earlier or to us later on, or in general. Anyways seems like he lied.
completely agree
|
On April 23 2013 11:48 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 11:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 23 2013 11:42 Clarity_nl wrote:On April 23 2013 11:36 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 23 2013 11:34 getmoript wrote:
Oats since you're here, why do you want to lynch yamato? meh I changed my mind again, I dont wanna lynch him. GAME SO HARD. Im town, yamato is town. Who is scum? ##UnvoteClarity's case looks kinda weird, like random filtering dudes and bringing up someone 'new' that has not been discussed other than 'REALLY GOOD SCUM OR TOWNNNN'. Clarity, thoughts on me and yamato? I never said really good scum or town, in fact I think he's bad scum. Like I said I have no idea about you. I liked yamato's post on ace. No I said, Why Sharrent? There has been absolutely no other discussion on him? Why not discuss the things that are currently issues in the thread? Tis not how I roll. Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 11:44 getmoript wrote:
So Clarity, are you seriously flat out admitting to not reading the thread and making a case off of a random filter? I read the thread I just posted I was catching up a little after I started reading >.> Maybe comment on my case instead of twisting my words?
obvious lying is obvious^
|
Clarity also said there was 0 resistance to the yamato lynch
misrepresentation/proof he's not reading OR EVEN LOOKING AT VOTECOUNT
yamato's lynch had me, ace, and a ton of others trying to see whether or not he was truly scum
Ace seemed to get a better read off of it than I... and coaxed a lot to vote Oats
I Felt like Oats was town, and was only leaning on Yamato, so I went with the better wagon (WE KNOW THIS NOW)
|
On April 23 2013 16:43 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 16:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 23 2013 16:33 Clarity_nl wrote:
Cause you're both anti town in the dumbest ways possible, but not convinced either of ye are scum just yet. You have a higher chance than most, though. There has also been 0 resistance to both your lynches Well Vivax did try and derail yamato's lynch with his case So resistance to yamato's lynch. Also technically your case on sharrent has also been resistance. Which means that resistance being a factor in someone being scum is bullshit. I wanna lynch you kinda clarity, you know why? Yes good point, clearly I should look at myself when I say "there's been no resistance" Anyway, I'll indulge you, why?
twisting oats words here
oats tried to question him, but clarity deflected
didnt have to worry about town that was about to get lynched, huh?
|
On April 24 2013 07:44 Vivax wrote:
BM.
What's your stance on yamato currently?
What do we make of tube and Drazak?
Yamato is coasting since his D1 wagon derailed
He has improved his usefulness, but I would lynch him over Clarity right now... hell, I'd lynch Sharrant over both of them, even BC. I'd rather off people I have null reads on.
Yamato is either a townie, or scum, from my standpoint. I don't see him being a power role
|
Tube seems smart. He and I agreed on a point. Drazak I would feel would be an inactivity lynch, and I don't particularly like to lynch people that we can potentially have replaced.
|
So, I was just doing voting analysis, and I saw this gem in the voting thread: On April 23 2013 21:18 Vivax wrote:
UNOFFICIAL VOTE COUNT
Oatsmaster: Palmar, kushm4sta, GiygaS, Vivax, raynpelikoneet, kushm4sta, Ace, WoS, Yamato, VE, Palmar(9)
Hopeless1der: Vivax (0)
Bill Murray: raynpelikoneet, VisceraEyes (0)
Getmoript: Mr. Cheesecake, kushm4sta,WaveofShadow (0)
TheRavensName: Sharrant (0)
Raynpelikoneet: Sharrant, Sylencia, Hopeless1der, ObviousOne(3)
Ace: Yamato, Bill Murray (0)
Sharrant: raynpelikoneet (0)
Yamato: kushm4sta, BloodyCobbler, Ace, Grush57, raynpelikoneet, VisceraEyes, ObviousOne, getmoript, Bill Murray, TheRavensName [b](6)
VisceraEyes: Palmar, Yamato (0)
With 25 alive it takes 13 votes to lynch.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
BM's vote is wrong but that one doesn't matter anyway.
Oats needs 4 votes for the hammer.
Asking those on Rayn to switch to Oats pls. [/b]
Why was Vivax not warned/modkilled for this? Having lines of information "Bill Murray's vote is wrong, and doesn't matter anyways" is ridiculous. His votecount is misleading, as well
...how can hosts let this behavior happen?
|
Clarity, before you go - NO, I am NOT satisfied
You're "Reading two hours before" but you find your way to the last 2 pages randomly? explain that logic
|
|
|
On April 25 2013 01:39 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2013 01:38 WaveofShadow wrote:
Let's chat about how useless kush and Sylencia's posts are.
Like...why even post? Kush is so town it's not even funny. Sylencia I'm really sure about, I want him to explain that post more.
slip
|
how is that a typo? you are slipping regarding you having too much information, and therefore, mafia
|
His post seemed like he wanted to out some important information before night.
It's a null tell that he isn't here.
|
makes me lean town on him, but I want to see more before it's more than a lean. sorry to doublepost.
|
On April 25 2013 02:06 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2013 02:04 Bill Murray wrote:
makes me lean town on him, but I want to see more before it's more than a lean. sorry to doublepost. Good to know. What do you think of WoS right now? @WaveofShadows You didn't dispute me, or respond when I said Kush was super town. Am I to believe that you agree that he is town?
i was leaning town on him until theravensname brought up some points and it made me feel like WoS is a bit opportunistic
|
Yeah - activity isn't a scumtell - it's the reaction to activity or inactivity that is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
