TL Mafia LXI - Page 3

On April 23 2013 10:17 Bill Murray wrote:
check out "drazak"
he has already come out with an excuse, and he has made, from what I can tell, 2 one liners. He was around for 45 minutes, but only read 2 pages? Seems like he had to catch up on a scum quicktime/topic/whatever it's called by that timeframe

I always vote people when they come back saying that. Sure, he might not feel well, but his thread image was in no way suffering. Why the excuses? Lurkerish behavior + that time frame fits mafia needs...

##vote: drazak

On April 23 2013 21:44 Palmar wrote:


don't even care if you're scum. throwing suspicion on your emperor should be punishable by death.

On April 23 2013 21:22 Vivax wrote:
Me and ace are basically the only ones asking people to switch to Oats, others say "can do", others say it looks like a policy, or try to push other cases.

If this was a wagon on a townie, scum could be pushing it easily at this point.
Why didn't any of this happen yet? There's resistance here.

On April 23 2013 22:20 Vivax wrote:
Here, I have a more scientific approach. Oats' posting frequency.

Before case:
22 posts between 21 – ~17:00 and 23 – 00:43 - 29:34 difference – 0.71 posts per hour

After case and bandwagon started:
39 posts between 23 – 00:43 and 23:22 – 22:39 h – difference – 1.74 posts per hour

On April 23 2013 22:29 Oatsmaster wrote:

Before case: Weird shit between TRM/WoS/Sharrent and others so yeah I DIDNT POST. MY FAULT.

After case: Game got interesting, real interesting. Interesting games means that you are more inclined to post right?

On April 23 2013 22:36 Vivax wrote:
Whatever, you're at L-1, dead. If you're town you shouldn't jumping around hysterically, but tell us who we should look at after your flip.

TRN, if you want to have yamato lynched instead of Oats, it's not my job to find arguments for you. I'd want to have Oats lynched first.

On April 23 2013 22:36 Oatsmaster wrote:

No, I have nothing to post so I dont post.

On April 23 2013 22:47 Vivax wrote:


Don't worry, if no one vigs him tonight, there will be plenty of opportunity tomorrow to take care of yamato. It's not unlikely at all that they're both scum, given that yamato seemed to work against Oats' lynch when he claimed to have him as scum earlier.

On March 22 2013 20:48 Blazinghand wrote:

Remus Lupin (Vigilante): You may not shoot during Night 1.

On April 24 2013 08:05 TheRavensName wrote:
Oh look, WoS asking questions and then doing nothing with them again. You have no analysis of anyone that isn't "But I'll wait to see what happens before I do anything with it." Which isn't really scum hunting, its more like pretending to be scum hunting and giving you an excuse not to follow up on. Someone look at his filter, and see most of the people he makes any accusation or comment on are: I guess he could be this but I'm hesittant and not really sure. Did you actually make any reads your willing to stand by? You call Sharant a couple of times in after the whole exchange me and Ray had with him, but you never actually state why you think hes town or even say it unless its in response to people making case against him. It almost seems like you want to protect him and then just not have any flat out reasons that can be analyzed and no real analysis of a connection between the two of you if one of you died.

At the very least, I would like to see you explain your town read on him since all you have said so far is "I have a super strong town read on him." and not actually went into WHY you have a town read on him

On April 24 2013 10:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The problem is that you have a shitton of questions in your filter and none of them seem to lead you into any kind of a conclusion. I have gone though your filter for two times now to understand what are you trying to do in this game (how your posting = you trying to find scum) and i don't just see it.

On April 24 2013 11:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
TRN, do you have any other candidates for scum?

On April 24 2013 11:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I would like to see what Sharrant contributes next when he comes back. I think he is town atm.
Do you think Clarity's case was well thought out? I think he only pointed out the facts that speak against Sharrant from his filter and left Sharrant's real contributions out.

On April 24 2013 17:32 yamato77 wrote:
He was after TRN, which he later dropped, and rightly so. His case was meh, but his conclusion that TRN was likely town is not one I would see a mafia in Sharrant's position make.

On April 24 2013 20:42 TheRavensName wrote:
Also I'm just curious because truth be told, I dislike WoS right now a lot more then I dislike Sharrant... do you think some of the points me and Rayn brought up before on shar make sense? He has a four page filter and a similar contribution level as yourself Yamato, which is impressive considering you spent the first half of the game trolling.