TL Mafia LXI - Page 3

On April 23 2013 08:53 Ace wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Bill. Make sure everyone who posts in this thread has correct grammar.

On April 23 2013 09:11 WaveofShadow wrote:
Anyway to sum it up, I'm more sure of an Oats lynch than yamato; a lot of conflicted things going on with him that I just can't be sure of.

Now,

Because you're obviously town and obviously searching in the wrong places. I'll indulge though because I know what it was like in my first big game; I see much of myself in you, young padawan.

If you'd actually read my filter, you calling me wishy-washy doesn't make sense at all. I've had definite reads all game; just because I haven't voted anyone yet or had a very strong scumread doesn't make me scum. I don't have to post massive cases on people to be scumhunting. Those will come later.

On April 23 2013 09:12 yamato77 wrote:

Do you want me to talk about someone other than VE?

I could talk about BC

On April 23 2013 09:17 yamato77 wrote:

Well, there are 3 replacements being called for. Not gonna try to divine alignment from people that aren't playing.

Ace is a tricky one. The case I posted earlier before his interaction with BC was kinda bad, but I don't understand how he developed a scum read on me whatsoever.

On April 23 2013 09:21 Palmar wrote:
Bill Murray is the towniest fucker in this thread.

On April 23 2013 09:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
I didn't say VE is scum. I said an inactive VE is often scum. but I was thankful that he has started posting more because that probably means he's NOT scum and fits with my townread.

Don't put words in my mouth, Vivax.


Objective was the wrong word to use, yeah. What I meant was everything he says about VE makes sense considering his actions in the games I've played with him, but again there's something in VE's play that has been assuring me he's town...I'll call it a gutread.

If Oats flipped town? I'd honestly be tempted to destroy a lot of the lurk going on but they're probably getting replaced and I also know that's not great right now. As far as 'active' posters go ShiaoPi's attack on a town Sharrant doesn't look great to me. I don't have other strong scumreads atm and am going to have to go through and look if you want more than that.

On April 23 2013 09:25 Ace wrote:
##vote Oatsmaster

Think he's the better lynch looking at Vivax's list. Too many people prefer Oats but haven't changed to it so I will do so. yamato just being useless, eventual vigi bait.

On April 23 2013 09:27 yamato77 wrote:

I am not being useless, lol.

Just because I don't listen to you does not make me a good vigi shot.

On April 23 2013 09:28 Vivax wrote:


Well, uh. Who are your strong scumreads?
I wasn't putting words in your mouth, I simply said what it looked like to me, you're free to correct me.

I might add though that you give me a very defensive impression, you seem to not like talking with me about this stuff at all to the point of asking me for justification for my questions.

So I'd like to talk a little more to see if the doubts are unfounded: The thing regarding the double bus quote you picked up, why didn't you say outright that you don't think both can be scum, but at the time where you posted it, you didn't really make a choice between the two, or comment on my case?

You admitted that you were putting the thought out there that both couldn't be scum without saying it outright and instead asked others.
But you say that you don't know if yamato is scum.
Yet you didn't outright vote for Oats, and instead only recently claimed your preference of Oats in an earlier post, as shown in my chronology?

On April 23 2013 09:29 VisceraEyes wrote:

Maybe the shit you give me stings more cause I like you.

Whatever, the point is that I'm clearly trying to find scum and you're like ignoring that fact. Also yamato looks scummy as shit and you're throwing in your lot with him.

Palmar-Thats-Never-Wrong is a friend and I miss him. Why don't you see if you can conjure that dude up?

On April 23 2013 09:38 yamato77 wrote:

I'm pretty sure he's town.

Why do you think otherwise?

On April 23 2013 10:00 Oatsmaster wrote:

Dont worry, I did ^_^.


King Palmar so town.

On April 23 2013 10:01 Ace wrote:


Ones in bold need to follow through and vote for Oats.

On April 23 2013 10:34 Clarity_nl wrote:
I am here now and catching up, did not expect this game to start so soon, sorry.

On April 23 2013 11:34 Bill Murray wrote:

one hour later has read the entire game and made a case on sharrant?
his case is really tunnely, and reaching, as well
FoS Clarity

On April 24 2013 07:02 Vivax wrote:
The explanation doesn't add up at all.

Starts reading -> Says I'm here after 2h-> case after 1 h -> BM calls him out saying the case is bad and made in just one hour -> Clarity answers "Yeah well I figured I'd say hi after seeing that I didn't post anything -> Vivax calls him out again for quick case -> Clarity: "Yeah well I actually read for 3 hours."

Why does he answer to BM, talking about clarity's case being bad and the short time (second post), with a justification for his entrance post (first post)?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Clarity could have replied, as town: "I actually read for 3 hours, so what's your problem with my case?"

But Clarity was scared that his case looked scummy cause of BM's reaction, so he instead posted a justification for his late entrance, which he knew looked bad, and felt guilty for. And he didn't want to correct BM in saying that he read for so long precisely cause he'd have had less justification to explain the bad case.

Now that he's being pressured for the short time in which the case was written, he gives another justification where he actually claims that he was reading for a longer time.

When BM pressured him, he wanted to make it look like he made something in haste by arguing that he wanted to post before the hammer.
Now that it's exactly the point against him, he says that he was actually reading for a longer time.

On April 24 2013 06:57 tube wrote:
Where's drazak?
Inactivity should be pushed.