TL Mafia LXI - Page 3

On April 23 2013 06:53 kushm4sta wrote:
lurking on phone.
rather kill yamato
oats is just really inactive so I can't get a good read.

On April 23 2013 07:58 Bill Murray wrote:


well, you can get over it. you're a high filutin ignoramous that thinks he's breakthrough, and liberal

so what if i dont care

the only people who care about my revolutionary town techniques are mafia, or Ace. He seems to be avoiding the spotlight this game, though, so I'm going to let him be. He might bag us ~3 mafia before it's all over.

On April 23 2013 08:47 Bill Murray wrote:

hmmm. It might be too late for a shift, but this logic is definitely something that I wouldn't mind a concerted effort in analyzing... Scum have that sort of mindset... but what if Oats is an offering? That would look bad on Vivax, then!

On April 23 2013 09:18 Vivax wrote:
Vivax → Case
Ace → prefers Oats, initially pushed yamato
CC → announces to look through yamato and Oats
VE → Would get behind Oats lynch
Kush → prefers yamato
Giyga → Ask Oats question about earlier vote against him
OO → Prefers yamato
Rayn → Prefers oats
Kush → Changes mind to lynching Oats
Palmar → Could do Oats. Also, VE is scum.
Giyga → Announces delay in looking through them
WoS → Says VE is scum, mentions something scummy about Oats. Worried about Oats posting something about yamato
Yamato → Said Oats could be scum earlier, VE IS SCUM but pops in and says BC and Ace could both be mafia. Bleh.
Getmoript → votes yamato
BM → Votes yamato
TRN → Votes yamato for martyring
Giyga → Prefers Oats
WoS → Claims to prefer Oats.
Kush → Actual change of vote to Oats

On April 23 2013 11:54 getmoript wrote:
So you voted for a town read when you got mad. Are you serious? I can't even keep a straight face right now considering how fucking hilarious of an excuse that is.

On April 23 2013 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:

Because I already said enough about it, and I wanted to get a bandwagon rolling on ace.

On April 24 2013 04:53 Clarity_nl wrote:


I didn't not want to lynch him either. It didn't feel right but as hopeless pointed out in the face of dying he was just still being trolly.... you don't do that as town..

Yamato why were you so certain that oats was town, I think you were the only one. It wasn't that you were explaining how he was a bad lynch, you were saying HE IS TOWN OMG IDIOTS.
What made you so sure?

On April 24 2013 17:32 yamato77 wrote:
He was after TRN, which he later dropped, and rightly so. His case was meh, but his conclusion that TRN was likely town is not one I would see a mafia in Sharrant's position make.

His read on geript seems genuine. Despite the claim, he finds geript scummy, but can't lynch him because of the sentiment that he's town for the host interaction.

I like his read on you and how he handled it. I like how he interacted with BM, it seemed honest and a real product of frustration.

He also has a scumread on Hopeless. I haven't personally looked at Hopeless, but that's another point in his favor.

In the time he has been here, I like Sharrant's contributions, even if he may be wrong about some things.

On April 24 2013 17:36 yamato77 wrote:
Rayn specifically asked who else Sharrant had been after, so I discussed it in those terms. You're just as bad as BC.

On April 24 2013 17:40 yamato77 wrote:

Furthermore, I've seen plenty of mafia tunnel an unpopular scumread to look original. Happens all the time. I rarely see mafia back down from an early read, and even if they do, I even more rarely actually say that person is likely town and close the door on lynching them. That's not a mafia mentality.

The part in red is not ridiculous when we're discussing the NUMBER OF SHARRANTS READS. No matter whether I agree with him or not, his read on Hopeless seems genuine and not bullshit.

On April 24 2013 17:41 yamato77 wrote:

What are you talking about?

I never said anything about "nullifying a scum read".

Ace, what the fuck?