|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:39 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 12:21 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 22 2013 12:14 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 12:13 kushm4sta wrote:On April 22 2013 12:04 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 11:58 kushm4sta wrote:On April 22 2013 11:51 yamato77 wrote:
I don't like that TRN seems to fail at reading you, nor that he doesn't seem to understand how most games are started.
But meh, aside from that, most of the people posting right now seem town enough.
People that HAVE irked me so far include CC, VE, and Oats.
BM is also sketch for his claim thing. He "soft claimed" last game, too, and was mafia. This could be the same sort of play. Is yamato super scummy or is it just me? I mean I know he has some sort of IRL excuse (which I dont recall reading about myself actually) but dear lord he is scummy. He "doesn't like" that a noob is being a noob... WTF does that mean? Then he lists off some easy targets who haven't been here and say they "irk" him. Then BM is sketch. these words are very wishy washy. Also his comment on BM is really dumb reasoning compared to his usual town reasoning. TLDR, no conviction behind anything yamato Look up a dictionary and tell me where "sketch" and "irk" imply indecisiveness and I'll take this post seriously. In the context of forum mafia they do. what do they imply? Suspicious activity has been detected in the vicinity of the Oats/CC/VE/BM area. Proceed with caution. explain in one sentence for each player, what makes them scum? I'm also interested in seeing an explanation so repeating this for emphasis. Yamato I get a wishy washy vibe from you too based on that post. Are you just dropping a FOS or do you think they are legit Scum candidates?
Could add Ace to the list for this post where he echoes thread sentiment for no good reason after not posting for forever.
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:51 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 12:47 yamato77 wrote:
Considering that most of the people I'm looking at aren't posting, I'll refrain from commenting on them in order to wait and see what they do decide to do with their time when they are here.
If this response isn't what you were looking for, I really don't care. If they aren't posting then what the hell are you looking into?
It's called "the waiting game".
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:56 Ace wrote:
so instead of looking at the people currently here, you're waiting for lurkers? awesome plan you got there.
I already said I think most of the people posting (Rayn, Sharrant, Giygas) seem town.
You, on the other hand, are worth looking at.
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:57 getmoript wrote:
You aren't posting either. What are we supposed to make of that? You said in hydra iirc that as scum you're blatantly obvious as scum. If you're town why not engage us? Everything you've posted so far is blah and you're 'pressure' on your 'targets' is non-existent. Why those four?
If I'm not obviscum, then don't worry about it.
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 06:23 Ace wrote:
Palmar what do you think our main plans of action should be right now? Besides what seems like posturing and prodding by some people, I think waiting on Bill Murray to get back is our best option.
Agree/Disagree/Don't Care?
Seems like you wanted to do the same thing, Ace. Wait and see.
On April 22 2013 08:09 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 07:24 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 06:45 Ace wrote:
@Sharrant: RN looks like a noobie to me. I see. I am assuming this to be you saying he looks like a noobie town then, yes? Or are you saying he seems new, and null? Is there someone you would be comfortable with lynching right this second (aside from Bill Murray)? Is there someone you would recommend looking into? newbie and null. Not interested in lynching anyone specific at the moment. I'm just sitting back reading and will see what happens.
You apparently aren't even interested in the game enough to have reads worth mentioning.
On April 22 2013 12:39 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 12:21 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 22 2013 12:14 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 12:13 kushm4sta wrote:On April 22 2013 12:04 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 11:58 kushm4sta wrote:On April 22 2013 11:51 yamato77 wrote:
I don't like that TRN seems to fail at reading you, nor that he doesn't seem to understand how most games are started.
But meh, aside from that, most of the people posting right now seem town enough.
People that HAVE irked me so far include CC, VE, and Oats.
BM is also sketch for his claim thing. He "soft claimed" last game, too, and was mafia. This could be the same sort of play. Is yamato super scummy or is it just me? I mean I know he has some sort of IRL excuse (which I dont recall reading about myself actually) but dear lord he is scummy. He "doesn't like" that a noob is being a noob... WTF does that mean? Then he lists off some easy targets who haven't been here and say they "irk" him. Then BM is sketch. these words are very wishy washy. Also his comment on BM is really dumb reasoning compared to his usual town reasoning. TLDR, no conviction behind anything yamato Look up a dictionary and tell me where "sketch" and "irk" imply indecisiveness and I'll take this post seriously. In the context of forum mafia they do. what do they imply? Suspicious activity has been detected in the vicinity of the Oats/CC/VE/BM area. Proceed with caution. explain in one sentence for each player, what makes them scum? I'm also interested in seeing an explanation so repeating this for emphasis. Yamato I get a wishy washy vibe from you too based on that post. Are you just dropping a FOS or do you think they are legit Scum candidates?
But yet you seem to like +1ing posts that imply suspicion on people
On April 22 2013 05:09 Ace wrote:
+1 to ObviousOne's post
+ Show Spoiler +On April 22 2013 05:03 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 04:52 Ace wrote:On April 22 2013 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 01:11 Vivax wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On April 22 2013 01:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 00:08 Vivax wrote:
Not sure what to make of BM "claiming" snape like that. If I were to make a crazy guess, he's checking whether the real snape shows up contesting the claim, then say he posted some random shit cause he was drunk (cause that's what his posts look like ). And if the real snape doesn't show up, he will claim he's snape.
That'd be pretty ballsy, but effective scumplay. Let's see what BM has to say regarding this. What's in your opinion the point of doing this as we can't know how many of each roles are in the game? If there is someone who claims snape, why can't BM be another one? Vivax could you answer this? I don't think there can be two self-aware millers. Don't see much point in discussing that atm, why does it concern you at this point? BM didn't even answer yet. Because the OP clearly states there can be multiple number of same roles, so discussing if there are one or more self-aware millers in stupid in the first place. Anyone who claims miller on D1 should be lynched. ##Vote: Bill Murray Bill Murray's post wasn't a claim though This is true enough, though one wonders about the motivation for even saying the name. It's not outside the realm of possibility that he wanted to nudge the town causing millers to claim. Doesn't tell me if he is town or scum, either; he could be fishing for mafia to rise to the bait and miller claim as well. Discussion went (without his explicit aid) towards lynching all miller claims and that theoretical concept was shut down. Why don't we just ask him if he's claiming miller and move on until he comes back? His activity in Boardwalk was mostly in the late evening/early morning hours (EST), so we'll see what he has to say about it when he comes back. In the mean time, ShiaoPi why did you want to kill Bill Murray as your first game post? It doesn't exactly jive with your previous post in the pre-game. Explain please.
So even more so than me, you don't seem to care what the thread is doing, don't want to talk about reads, and seem content waiting on one person to explain his claim in order to do ANYTHING today.
But you're content with your +1 of suspicion on me while repeating the same drivel the people that have already spoken have said.
I'd kill Ace. Forreal.
##Vote Ace
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 12:59 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Ugh, all I've got are feel reads. I wouldn't mind lynching me a Hopeless or Giygas (idc how you spell it) today. No reasoning given, just the feels. Hard evidence is difficult to come by unless I'm purposely trying to lynch townies as mafia t.t /complain.
I feel like sharrant is town, for the record. Ray is probably town. Yamato I'm disappointed hasn't been shouting at people so I could easily discern his alignment, but unfortunately he has just been threatening to kill people. Icantbelievehesnullbro.
Shiaopi i think would be a decent target as well.
Could someone just yell at me in all caps so I feel like I'm being pressured? Like seriously it's how I get my best reads -- on those who pressure me.
The last time you made a post like this, you were mafia.
Mafia CC, folks. Mafia.
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 13:07 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 13:06 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 12:59 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Ugh, all I've got are feel reads. I wouldn't mind lynching me a Hopeless or Giygas (idc how you spell it) today. No reasoning given, just the feels. Hard evidence is difficult to come by unless I'm purposely trying to lynch townies as mafia t.t /complain.
I feel like sharrant is town, for the record. Ray is probably town. Yamato I'm disappointed hasn't been shouting at people so I could easily discern his alignment, but unfortunately he has just been threatening to kill people. Icantbelievehesnullbro.
Shiaopi i think would be a decent target as well.
Could someone just yell at me in all caps so I feel like I'm being pressured? Like seriously it's how I get my best reads -- on those who pressure me.
The last time you made a post like this, you were mafia. Mafia CC, folks. Mafia. And the time before that I was town. Town CC, folks. Town. Are for the record, I caught you as mafia when you tunneled me. WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF
Even if I was mafia, I would not be afraid of you.
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 13:10 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 13:05 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 06:23 Ace wrote:
Palmar what do you think our main plans of action should be right now? Besides what seems like posturing and prodding by some people, I think waiting on Bill Murray to get back is our best option.
Agree/Disagree/Don't Care? Seems like you wanted to do the same thing, Ace. Wait and see. On April 22 2013 08:09 Ace wrote:On April 22 2013 07:24 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 06:45 Ace wrote:
@Sharrant: RN looks like a noobie to me. I see. I am assuming this to be you saying he looks like a noobie town then, yes? Or are you saying he seems new, and null? Is there someone you would be comfortable with lynching right this second (aside from Bill Murray)? Is there someone you would recommend looking into? newbie and null. Not interested in lynching anyone specific at the moment. I'm just sitting back reading and will see what happens. You apparently aren't even interested in the game enough to have reads worth mentioning. On April 22 2013 12:39 Ace wrote:On April 22 2013 12:21 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 22 2013 12:14 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 12:13 kushm4sta wrote:On April 22 2013 12:04 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 11:58 kushm4sta wrote:On April 22 2013 11:51 yamato77 wrote:
I don't like that TRN seems to fail at reading you, nor that he doesn't seem to understand how most games are started.
But meh, aside from that, most of the people posting right now seem town enough.
People that HAVE irked me so far include CC, VE, and Oats.
BM is also sketch for his claim thing. He "soft claimed" last game, too, and was mafia. This could be the same sort of play. Is yamato super scummy or is it just me? I mean I know he has some sort of IRL excuse (which I dont recall reading about myself actually) but dear lord he is scummy. He "doesn't like" that a noob is being a noob... WTF does that mean? Then he lists off some easy targets who haven't been here and say they "irk" him. Then BM is sketch. these words are very wishy washy. Also his comment on BM is really dumb reasoning compared to his usual town reasoning. TLDR, no conviction behind anything yamato Look up a dictionary and tell me where "sketch" and "irk" imply indecisiveness and I'll take this post seriously. In the context of forum mafia they do. what do they imply? Suspicious activity has been detected in the vicinity of the Oats/CC/VE/BM area. Proceed with caution. explain in one sentence for each player, what makes them scum? I'm also interested in seeing an explanation so repeating this for emphasis. Yamato I get a wishy washy vibe from you too based on that post. Are you just dropping a FOS or do you think they are legit Scum candidates? But yet you seem to like +1ing posts that imply suspicion on people On April 22 2013 05:09 Ace wrote:
+1 to ObviousOne's post + Show Spoiler +On April 22 2013 05:03 ObviousOne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 04:52 Ace wrote:On April 22 2013 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 01:11 Vivax wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On April 22 2013 01:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 00:08 Vivax wrote:
Not sure what to make of BM "claiming" snape like that. If I were to make a crazy guess, he's checking whether the real snape shows up contesting the claim, then say he posted some random shit cause he was drunk (cause that's what his posts look like ). And if the real snape doesn't show up, he will claim he's snape.
That'd be pretty ballsy, but effective scumplay. Let's see what BM has to say regarding this. What's in your opinion the point of doing this as we can't know how many of each roles are in the game? If there is someone who claims snape, why can't BM be another one? Vivax could you answer this? I don't think there can be two self-aware millers. Don't see much point in discussing that atm, why does it concern you at this point? BM didn't even answer yet. Because the OP clearly states there can be multiple number of same roles, so discussing if there are one or more self-aware millers in stupid in the first place. Anyone who claims miller on D1 should be lynched. ##Vote: Bill Murray Bill Murray's post wasn't a claim though This is true enough, though one wonders about the motivation for even saying the name. It's not outside the realm of possibility that he wanted to nudge the town causing millers to claim. Doesn't tell me if he is town or scum, either; he could be fishing for mafia to rise to the bait and miller claim as well. Discussion went (without his explicit aid) towards lynching all miller claims and that theoretical concept was shut down. Why don't we just ask him if he's claiming miller and move on until he comes back? His activity in Boardwalk was mostly in the late evening/early morning hours (EST), so we'll see what he has to say about it when he comes back. In the mean time, ShiaoPi why did you want to kill Bill Murray as your first game post? It doesn't exactly jive with your previous post in the pre-game. Explain please. So even more so than me, you don't seem to care what the thread is doing, don't want to talk about reads, and seem content waiting on one person to explain his claim in order to do ANYTHING today. But you're content with your +1 of suspicion on me while repeating the same drivel the people that have already spoken have said. I'd kill Ace. Forreal. ##Vote Ace I'm a pretty patient fellow. I'm interested in the game - I just don't post my reads every second of the day. That's pretty much my standard operating procedure. Seems like your entire case is me not throwing around suspicions but instead, asking people to clarify stuff other people have pointed out. How is that scummy again?
You're calling me scummy for the same thing, bro.
|
11589 Posts
On April 22 2013 13:51 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 13:48 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 22 2013 13:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 22 2013 12:57 yamato77 wrote:On April 22 2013 12:56 Ace wrote:
so instead of looking at the people currently here, you're waiting for lurkers? awesome plan you got there. I already said I think most of the people posting (Rayn, Sharrant, Giygas) seem town. You, on the other hand, are worth looking at. Mafia is a game about finding mafia not town + waiting on lurkers for more reads? How about you analyze whos already here. Also still catching up but this is the single worst post ive seen to this point of reading Waiting for sick reads BC  Its day 1, id expect to not get those from me at this juncture. Yamato is likely scum, BM should be lynched or vigi'd. If drH doesn't appear within the next 12 hoursish he is almost deff scum.
No, you're mafia!
|
11589 Posts
If you guys are lucky, I'll tell you who mafia is tomorrow.
By that I mean identify the whole team.
Or, at least, the 5 people I'm most suspicious of at that time.
|
11589 Posts
VE is mafia.
##Unvote
##Vote VisceraEyes
|
11589 Posts
For the record, I would also lynch Oats for being a snarky ass on the sidelines and not actually being involved like I know town Oats to be.
Ace is lynchable because his reasoning for throwing suspicion on me is ass and he's been posting bullshit the entire game.
BC is nullish, despite my earlier proclamation. He could have made that post as either alignment. More information is necessary to lynch him.
CC is too quiet to be town CC. His "tunnel me" charade is a copycat from Nomination where he replaced in day 1. His shitty null reads are also indicative of him being mafia; town CC calls people mafia and gives no fucks about being wrong.
And VE is mafia because his reasoning for being suspicious of me is ass, just like Ace. Only VE is even worse because he should know better. Unfortunately, however, a VE that blindly follows thread sentiment is a scum VE. Lynch him.
|
11589 Posts
Why could only a mafia player make that statement?
|
11589 Posts
Could both BC and Ace both be mafia?
That would be pretty funny.
|
11589 Posts
Man, my play sucks this game.
|
11589 Posts
I'm still pretty sure I'm right about VE/Oats
CC I'm less sure of.
This whole BC/Ace dynamic is suspect in general.
Really, I'm not trying to stop from getting lynched. Just leaving behind my reads for when I die.
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 07:38 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 07:32 yamato77 wrote:
Could both BC and Ace both be mafia?
That would be pretty funny. Where's your enthusiasm, boy. You said Oats could be scum earlier. Is he your scumbuddy or what.
For once, Vivax, you're actually questioning the right things.
But look into your heart, and know Oats is mafia.
|
11589 Posts
If it makes you feel better, I'll vote Oats.
I'd rather kill VE, though, for saying he's trying when he admits his vote is pure OMGUS shit.
|
11589 Posts
On April 23 2013 07:42 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 07:41 yamato77 wrote:
If it makes you feel better, I'll vote Oats.
I'd rather kill VE, though, for saying he's trying when he admits his vote is pure OMGUS shit. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I know, it's funny when I point out you actually typed those things, isn't it?
|
11589 Posts
Game of BC/Ace analysed:
1) Tell everyone how bad they are.
2) Call one of them mafia.
3) Bully other people out of their good reads,
4) Tell everyone how good you are.
5) Complain about town being bad, again.
6) Subtly follow thread sentiment while acting like you actually have a good reason for finding someone mafia.
7) Call someone else bad.
8) Get lynched anyway (this is the part I need help on, bros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
