|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 13:43 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2013 13:33 yamato77 wrote:
Ace, if you're town, you seriously need your head examined if you're just going to throw shit at me the whole game while never substantiating your claims.
I'm very undecided on how I should view your continued lack of effort in this department, because you seem more than willing to talk about ANYTHING but analysis of my alignment, which I have repeatedly asked for from you and you have repeatedly ignored.
I literally can't get past this roadblock in my mind, so you need to step it up. are you dumb? You've promised analysis several times and have not delivered - check appeared on voting wagons where we believe scum to be - check posted a poor post in defense of the clarity lynch trying to derail the bandwagon at the last minute and accuse shiaopi - check + Show Spoiler +On April 27 2013 17:14 yamato77 wrote:So I kind of re-skimmed the thread and looked over what people have said, finally, and this post by Shiao is quite bad: Show nested quote +On April 27 2013 02:35 ShiaoPi wrote:
Well, that took a lot of time to read.
Not so sure about whom to lynch now with tube getting modkilled (lol btw!). I also have very limited time during the entire weekend, which is obviously gimping me by quite a bit as I while only be able to drop by shortly during the evening/late night before I sleep.
I am currently torn between clarity and VE.
Going with VE for now because I think it is a good idea to sheep Palmar. Go figure.
##vote: VE
If there are no direct questions to me in the next couple of minutes I'll be off to bed until I can come back on tomorrow at about the same time as right now. Much has been said about this entrance, but it was horrible, for a number of reasons. While it can be reasonably assumed that he is actually busy, the amount of this post used to excuse his own inactivity is mind-blowing. He has no original thought about the game, and doesn't seem to care about giving us any valid reasons for voting for VE outside of Palmar's lackluster efforts in pushing for the lynch. And then there's the bolded, his "reaction" to the tube modkill, that sets something off in my head. It seems unnatural and forced to go "(lol btw!)" in the middle of this post. I'd be happy with lynching him, if we feel we need to consolidate on a lynch. I've advocated playing a waiting game, but I saw it mentioned that we've only really talked about lynching between him/Clarity today, and I agree, so perhaps it is best if we move on. Another thing I thought to look at was the WHOLE votecount from day 1, not just the Oats wagon: Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 13:25 iamperfection wrote:~~~ Vote Count! ~~~
Oatsmaster: Palmar, kushm4sta, GiygaS, Vivax, raynpelikoneet, kushm4sta, Ace, WaveofShadow,yamato77,VisceraEyes,Palmar,getmoript, Mr. CC (11)
Hopeless1der: Vivax (0)
Bill Murray: raynpelikoneet, VisceraEyes (0)
Getmoript: Mr. Cheesecake, kushm4sta,WaveofShadow (0)
TheRavensName: Sharrant (0)
Raynpelikoneet: Sharrant, Sylencia, Hopeless1der, ObviousOne(3)
Ace: Yamato, Bill Murray (0)
Sharrant: raynpelikoneetClarity_nl (1)
Yamato: kushm4sta, BloodyCobbler, Ace, Grush57, raynpelikoneet, VisceraEyes, ObviousOne, getmoript, Bill Murray, TheRavensName,Oatsmaster (4)
VisceraEyes: Palmar, Yamato (0)
GiygaS: Oatsmaster (0)
Drazek: Bill Murray (1)
Remember, this Day ends when a majority is reached. As soon as a majority is reached, please stop posting until the Night Post has been posted. Only votes in the voting thread will be counted! The voting thread can be found here: (link)
With 25 alive it takes 13 votes to lynch. There are some changes to this: Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 21:39 Hopeless1der wrote:
##Unvote: raynpelikoneet
##Vote: Oatsmaster So the votecount itself is somewhat difficult to analyse, seeing as most people were either on me or Oats, but the people on Rayn do seem out of place, and it is even more weird that two of them managed to get themselves on to Oats before his lynch; Sylencia and Hopeless. Also note that Shiao's only vote of the whole day was the hammer on Oats. And people want to say that it isn't scummy? Yeah, no. But as before, there were multiple vote changes inbetween, and they are worth looking into. To begin why did Sylencia decide to change to Oats? Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 23:58 Sylencia wrote:Oats is the vote for me. Case from Vivax + aftermath between yamato vs Oats has convinced me more to taking down Oats. The thing that was holding me back most was that my primary scum suspect (rayn) was on Oats fairly early on. However: On April 23 2013 22:36 Vivax wrote:
Whatever, you're at L-1, dead. If you're town you shouldn't jumping around hysterically, but tell us who we should look at after your flip.
TRN, if you want to have yamato lynched instead of Oats, it's not my job to find arguments for you. I'd want to have Oats lynched first. Given that Oats never actually provided anything for us in terms of reads afterwards and posted crap about being green and telling people to push others. If he has nothing to say either: a) He's playing as the bad townie b) He's withholding that info from us to stop us from gaining more than we need from the lynch. Either case is bad for town, so that's why I'm willing to go down on Oats. ##Unvote
##Vote Oats Seems more of a case for voting for "bad town" than scum, which seems like a slip of a scum mindset, in my opinion. Why? Because it is something I run into as scum, how to formulate a read on a town player and call them scum so I can vote for them. Most of the time, it is "bad town" that get mislynched, so the difference becomes vague. Justifying a vote by saying that someone is "bad for town" is an easy scum out, because town players can and will be anti-town on many occasions. Yet this is Sylencia's mindset, and how he justifies the vote on Oats. Just from this voting analysis, I feel he might be mafia. I have yet to analyse his filter in totality, but given this, I will definitely give it a look. Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 21:39 Hopeless1der wrote:
Vivax where did your unofficial count come from it looks wonky...
in any case, this should be L-1 on Oats
##Unvote: raynpelikoneet
##Vote: Oatsmaster Hopeless. + Show Spoiler +Anyway, this is Wonder's SECOND EVER mention of Oatsmaster, and the first one where he gives any inclination of thinking him mafia. AMAZING! HOW DID HE REACH THIS SECRET CONCLUSION?!?!?! Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 22:37 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 23 2013 21:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 23 2013 21:22 Vivax wrote:
Me and ace are basically the only ones asking people to switch to Oats, others say "can do", others say it looks like a policy, or try to push other cases.
If this was a wagon on a townie, scum could be pushing it easily at this point.
Why didn't any of this happen yet? There's resistance here. Again, worst reasoning ever. Cause im town. Yeah. Hopeless. Why am I scum? I think you're too trolly in the face of dieing to be town. I'm not even certain you have a scum read on anyone at all. You've provided next to nothing. A shitty list post where your strongest scum read is "well someone has to be scum, why not Ace". gtfo. Wow. I'm not saying this is totally regurgitation of other people's arguments, but it is. This also come AFTER his vote, where he's fully aware that he's putting Oats one vote away from lynch. And then guess what happens... I unvote (temporarily delaying the lynch), Sylencia manages to vote AND: The hammer! This all happens within the span of ~2 hours, mind you, when I'm screaming at the thread not to lynch Oats. Say what you want about me, but all three of these votes are particularly HORRID, and all of them are either switches off Rayn (a wagon that seems inherently scummy, in that people that switched off it didn't seem to change their read on him much) or the player's first vote of the game. Is there a chance they are town? Sure. I'd probably say Sylencia has the most chance to be town, since when compared to the other two, his vote looks the MOST explained, despite the fishy nature of the post. The other two, however, give very little indication that they think Oats is mafia before they vote, and the hammer in particular looks like TEXTBOOK MAFIA trying to find a good reason to just lynch a town. Notably, I did something JUST like this day 1 of British Empire 1 (also instant majority), where I fabricated suspicion of a town-created wagon on a town player and managed to hammer him for the lynch. Only this is even worse, and more obvious, because they didn't even manage to look like they thought about it before obviously putting Oats in danger of, and actually being lynch. That's VCA done right, bros. And from it, I find the willingness to lynch the fuck out of Shiapi, because this is bullshit. No matter how much post-hoc justification he gives, there is only mafia motivation to be seen in what he has done. You clowned around all of day 1, almost got lynched and have shown no effort to step up. You've promised analysis on VE and BC and have failed to deliver. Telling the thread to just give you some more time. Yet you show up to blast ShiaoPi and not do what you promised. You aren't even trying to scumhunt - just throwing accusations at big name players. This apathy and lack of effort, that you yourself promised, shows you aren't focused. If you thought any of us you named were people you wanted lynched you would have made a case by now on us - not a case on ShiaoPi and ignoring clarity completely. GG scum.
I've provided almost all of the analysis I have promised, expect analysis of you, so that's a moot point. If you can't find analysis of BC and VE in my filter, you're not reading it.
I fucked around PART day 1, sure, whatever. Doesn't make me mafia.
I voted on Oats wagon, but guess what? So did you! AND, I was the only person who managed to realize that he was actually town, and tried to NOT get him lynched, so that's a non-issue. Your voting analysis is also shit and proves nothing about anyone, town or scum.
I never "defended" Clarity, I simply found SHIAO a better lynch, and I would still stand by my analysis of his posting. Just because Clarity was mafia doesn't mean Shiao isn't.
You may be right, I'm not completely focused on this game, but the effort is clearly there. I am here, in the thread, talking about my reads nearly every time I post. YOU are the one calling me mafia every time you post with ZERO fucking analysis to go along with it.
Your "reasoning" for finding Clarity a better lynch is laughable. I have no reason to believe you weren't just bussing him for cred you would have lost should he simply be modkilled. I have no reason to believe you actually found Shiao town based on anything but poor conclusions drawn from the "wagons" of three players, when you didn't consider ANYTHING about the context of the votes, why they were made, or whether they were changed or not.
It seems more like you just decided Shiao was town and had to find a reason to say so, rather than actually having analysed the information in the thread and reached a solid conclusion.
But hey, shit on my analysis some more. I guarantee one of syl/shiao/hopeless is mafia. You don't think those votes are fishy as fuck? Of course not, YOU SAID IT WASN'T BEFORE! LOLOLOL
Whatever. Shoot me. I'm obviously too angry to take this seriously.
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:13 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2013 13:59 yamato77 wrote:On April 28 2013 13:43 Ace wrote:On April 28 2013 13:33 yamato77 wrote:
Ace, if you're town, you seriously need your head examined if you're just going to throw shit at me the whole game while never substantiating your claims.
I'm very undecided on how I should view your continued lack of effort in this department, because you seem more than willing to talk about ANYTHING but analysis of my alignment, which I have repeatedly asked for from you and you have repeatedly ignored.
I literally can't get past this roadblock in my mind, so you need to step it up. are you dumb? You've promised analysis several times and have not delivered - check appeared on voting wagons where we believe scum to be - check posted a poor post in defense of the clarity lynch trying to derail the bandwagon at the last minute and accuse shiaopi - check + Show Spoiler +On April 27 2013 17:14 yamato77 wrote:So I kind of re-skimmed the thread and looked over what people have said, finally, and this post by Shiao is quite bad: Show nested quote +On April 27 2013 02:35 ShiaoPi wrote:
Well, that took a lot of time to read.
Not so sure about whom to lynch now with tube getting modkilled (lol btw!). I also have very limited time during the entire weekend, which is obviously gimping me by quite a bit as I while only be able to drop by shortly during the evening/late night before I sleep.
I am currently torn between clarity and VE.
Going with VE for now because I think it is a good idea to sheep Palmar. Go figure.
##vote: VE
If there are no direct questions to me in the next couple of minutes I'll be off to bed until I can come back on tomorrow at about the same time as right now. Much has been said about this entrance, but it was horrible, for a number of reasons. While it can be reasonably assumed that he is actually busy, the amount of this post used to excuse his own inactivity is mind-blowing. He has no original thought about the game, and doesn't seem to care about giving us any valid reasons for voting for VE outside of Palmar's lackluster efforts in pushing for the lynch. And then there's the bolded, his "reaction" to the tube modkill, that sets something off in my head. It seems unnatural and forced to go "(lol btw!)" in the middle of this post. I'd be happy with lynching him, if we feel we need to consolidate on a lynch. I've advocated playing a waiting game, but I saw it mentioned that we've only really talked about lynching between him/Clarity today, and I agree, so perhaps it is best if we move on. Another thing I thought to look at was the WHOLE votecount from day 1, not just the Oats wagon: Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 13:25 iamperfection wrote:~~~ Vote Count! ~~~
Oatsmaster: Palmar, kushm4sta, GiygaS, Vivax, raynpelikoneet, kushm4sta, Ace, WaveofShadow,yamato77,VisceraEyes,Palmar,getmoript, Mr. CC (11)
Hopeless1der: Vivax (0)
Bill Murray: raynpelikoneet, VisceraEyes (0)
Getmoript: Mr. Cheesecake, kushm4sta,WaveofShadow (0)
TheRavensName: Sharrant (0)
Raynpelikoneet: Sharrant, Sylencia, Hopeless1der, ObviousOne(3)
Ace: Yamato, Bill Murray (0)
Sharrant: raynpelikoneetClarity_nl (1)
Yamato: kushm4sta, BloodyCobbler, Ace, Grush57, raynpelikoneet, VisceraEyes, ObviousOne, getmoript, Bill Murray, TheRavensName,Oatsmaster (4)
VisceraEyes: Palmar, Yamato (0)
GiygaS: Oatsmaster (0)
Drazek: Bill Murray (1)
Remember, this Day ends when a majority is reached. As soon as a majority is reached, please stop posting until the Night Post has been posted. Only votes in the voting thread will be counted! The voting thread can be found here: (link)
With 25 alive it takes 13 votes to lynch. There are some changes to this: Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 21:39 Hopeless1der wrote:
##Unvote: raynpelikoneet
##Vote: Oatsmaster So the votecount itself is somewhat difficult to analyse, seeing as most people were either on me or Oats, but the people on Rayn do seem out of place, and it is even more weird that two of them managed to get themselves on to Oats before his lynch; Sylencia and Hopeless. Also note that Shiao's only vote of the whole day was the hammer on Oats. And people want to say that it isn't scummy? Yeah, no. But as before, there were multiple vote changes inbetween, and they are worth looking into. To begin why did Sylencia decide to change to Oats? Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 23:58 Sylencia wrote:Oats is the vote for me. Case from Vivax + aftermath between yamato vs Oats has convinced me more to taking down Oats. The thing that was holding me back most was that my primary scum suspect (rayn) was on Oats fairly early on. However: On April 23 2013 22:36 Vivax wrote:
Whatever, you're at L-1, dead. If you're town you shouldn't jumping around hysterically, but tell us who we should look at after your flip.
TRN, if you want to have yamato lynched instead of Oats, it's not my job to find arguments for you. I'd want to have Oats lynched first. Given that Oats never actually provided anything for us in terms of reads afterwards and posted crap about being green and telling people to push others. If he has nothing to say either: a) He's playing as the bad townie b) He's withholding that info from us to stop us from gaining more than we need from the lynch. Either case is bad for town, so that's why I'm willing to go down on Oats. ##Unvote
##Vote Oats Seems more of a case for voting for "bad town" than scum, which seems like a slip of a scum mindset, in my opinion. Why? Because it is something I run into as scum, how to formulate a read on a town player and call them scum so I can vote for them. Most of the time, it is "bad town" that get mislynched, so the difference becomes vague. Justifying a vote by saying that someone is "bad for town" is an easy scum out, because town players can and will be anti-town on many occasions. Yet this is Sylencia's mindset, and how he justifies the vote on Oats. Just from this voting analysis, I feel he might be mafia. I have yet to analyse his filter in totality, but given this, I will definitely give it a look. Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 21:39 Hopeless1der wrote:
Vivax where did your unofficial count come from it looks wonky...
in any case, this should be L-1 on Oats
##Unvote: raynpelikoneet
##Vote: Oatsmaster Hopeless. + Show Spoiler +Anyway, this is Wonder's SECOND EVER mention of Oatsmaster, and the first one where he gives any inclination of thinking him mafia. AMAZING! HOW DID HE REACH THIS SECRET CONCLUSION?!?!?! Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 22:37 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 23 2013 21:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 23 2013 21:22 Vivax wrote:
Me and ace are basically the only ones asking people to switch to Oats, others say "can do", others say it looks like a policy, or try to push other cases.
If this was a wagon on a townie, scum could be pushing it easily at this point.
Why didn't any of this happen yet? There's resistance here. Again, worst reasoning ever. Cause im town. Yeah. Hopeless. Why am I scum? I think you're too trolly in the face of dieing to be town. I'm not even certain you have a scum read on anyone at all. You've provided next to nothing. A shitty list post where your strongest scum read is "well someone has to be scum, why not Ace". gtfo. Wow. I'm not saying this is totally regurgitation of other people's arguments, but it is. This also come AFTER his vote, where he's fully aware that he's putting Oats one vote away from lynch. And then guess what happens... I unvote (temporarily delaying the lynch), Sylencia manages to vote AND: The hammer! This all happens within the span of ~2 hours, mind you, when I'm screaming at the thread not to lynch Oats. Say what you want about me, but all three of these votes are particularly HORRID, and all of them are either switches off Rayn (a wagon that seems inherently scummy, in that people that switched off it didn't seem to change their read on him much) or the player's first vote of the game. Is there a chance they are town? Sure. I'd probably say Sylencia has the most chance to be town, since when compared to the other two, his vote looks the MOST explained, despite the fishy nature of the post. The other two, however, give very little indication that they think Oats is mafia before they vote, and the hammer in particular looks like TEXTBOOK MAFIA trying to find a good reason to just lynch a town. Notably, I did something JUST like this day 1 of British Empire 1 (also instant majority), where I fabricated suspicion of a town-created wagon on a town player and managed to hammer him for the lynch. Only this is even worse, and more obvious, because they didn't even manage to look like they thought about it before obviously putting Oats in danger of, and actually being lynch. That's VCA done right, bros. And from it, I find the willingness to lynch the fuck out of Shiapi, because this is bullshit. No matter how much post-hoc justification he gives, there is only mafia motivation to be seen in what he has done. You clowned around all of day 1, almost got lynched and have shown no effort to step up. You've promised analysis on VE and BC and have failed to deliver. Telling the thread to just give you some more time. Yet you show up to blast ShiaoPi and not do what you promised. You aren't even trying to scumhunt - just throwing accusations at big name players. This apathy and lack of effort, that you yourself promised, shows you aren't focused. If you thought any of us you named were people you wanted lynched you would have made a case by now on us - not a case on ShiaoPi and ignoring clarity completely. GG scum. I've provided almost all of the analysis I have promised, expect analysis of you, so that's a moot point. If you can't find analysis of BC and VE in my filter, you're not reading it. I fucked around PART day 1, sure, whatever. Doesn't make me mafia. I voted on Oats wagon, but guess what? So did you! AND, I was the only person who managed to realize that he was actually town, and tried to NOT get him lynched, so that's a non-issue. Your voting analysis is also shit and proves nothing about anyone, town or scum. I never "defended" Clarity, I simply found SHIAO a better lynch, and I would still stand by my analysis of his posting. Just because Clarity was mafia doesn't mean Shiao isn't. You may be right, I'm not completely focused on this game, but the effort is clearly there. I am here, in the thread, talking about my reads nearly every time I post. YOU are the one calling me mafia every time you post with ZERO fucking analysis to go along with it. Your "reasoning" for finding Clarity a better lynch is laughable. I have no reason to believe you weren't just bussing him for cred you would have lost should he simply be modkilled. I have no reason to believe you actually found Shiao town based on anything but poor conclusions drawn from the "wagons" of three players, when you didn't consider ANYTHING about the context of the votes, why they were made, or whether they were changed or not. It seems more like you just decided Shiao was town and had to find a reason to say so, rather than actually having analysed the information in the thread and reached a solid conclusion. But hey, shit on my analysis some more. I guarantee one of syl/shiao/hopeless is mafia. You don't think those votes are fishy as fuck? Of course not, YOU SAID IT WASN'T BEFORE! LOLOLOL Whatever. Shoot me. I'm obviously too angry to take this seriously. *yawn* link me to your analysis please, and show me where you tried to rally votes onto those suspects. I'm waiting.
I clearly changed my opinion of them upon them actually responding to my accusations, if you have been reading the game.
But yeah, whatever, ignore me telling the thread to lynch BC at the end of day 1, ignore me telling the thread to lynch VE at the start of day 2, and ignore the cases I made on both of them on day 1, neither of which was outdated when I pushed for those lynches.
BUT GUESS WHAT?!
All you've said about me is "vig him" all game, so you're more guilty of "namedropping" than me. Get off your high horse.
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:20 Ace wrote:
I dont have a strong read on geript. I lol'd at the post where he called my points bad when he made it but a bunch of people needed to be clarified.
btw you guys should read yamato's last post. Its a beautiful gem of tl;dr syndrome.
SEE? YOU DID IT AGAIN!
How can you (falsely) accuse me of doing something you're doing yourself?
Complete bullshit. That's why you're mafia, Ace. You're just trying to use your gravitas as a player to push people into viewing me negatively.
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
yamato, it's bullshit you say you have seriously tried to convince anyone to lynch VE on D2.
I started out the day doing that, yes.
At some point I did realize that he might actually be town.
but whatever, you people alays try to crucify me for changing my reads when it's obviously an evolving process
ridiculous
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:23 Ace wrote:
what did I just do yamato that you've done? lol explain it to me
NAMEDROP
Say something inflammatory about a player in the game with zero purpose other than to further increase negative sentiment about them in the thread
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:26 Ace wrote:
who did I name drop?
ME
Can you read?
What the actual fuck?
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2013 06:47 yamato77 wrote:On April 27 2013 06:40 VisceraEyes wrote:
I didn't? Close enough: On April 26 2013 01:30 VisceraEyes wrote:
@yamato: I'm sorry I ever doubted you
@Sharrant: That's a good case too. :/ Consider me reconsidering my read.
@Palmar: I've never seen you push for my lynch so weakly. You claim I'm SO easy to read - if that's the case and you think I'm mafia, you're failing to get me lynched. townPalmar doesn't fail to get VE lynched. Sorry, just my experience. You can eat rope.
@OO: You're a bro, and mostly I agree with you - people voting me with little/no reasoning are very suspicious. However I'm afraid I'm biased in that particular case (obviously). And frankly, I'm well aware that I'm generally an active poster and my D1/N1 looked lacking. Right now the only person that fits that description that I would consider voting for is Palmar.
@All
Right now my lynch preference is thusly
ShiaoPi>Palmar>Clarity Town read on me. On April 26 2013 07:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
How about "I'm waiting to hear from yamato before commenting"?
You know....exactly what it says? Before I said I would respond. Reasonable, somewhat. On April 27 2013 00:33 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 27 2013 00:29 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On April 27 2013 00:24 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yamato being absentee is fucking weird...he didn't give any indication that he'd be gone for so long and he's got a BC case to refute if he can.
I want to lynch Palmar still.
Nothing has changed since I left except BM posting a lot and Palmar continuing to be awful. Being absent and not telling people is a towntell.bScum make sure people know they arent actively lurking. The thing is, Yamato DID say "I'll respond to this when I have time" So I mean, what you say may be true, but what Yamato says could be construed as doing exactly what you say. It's subjective. We really need him to respond to the case. This chain of quotes from you is suspicious as fuck. You want to be suspicious of me before I even fucking respond. On April 27 2013 05:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 27 2013 05:43 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
VE I am willing to swap my vote but I want to wait a few more hours on Yamato to actually respond. Because well, if he responds insanely badly I will want him lynched instead / give us required night period to ensure he gets vigied. I would attest that he's already responded insanely badly. Fuck you, you're mafia. If you call this a case i'm going to laugh at you. You are calling VE mafia because you didn't answer to BC and he put pressure on you and wanted you to answer. VE never even voted for you on D2. Way to go bro.
That was LATE day 2, and as I said, it was not long after this that I realized my renewed suspicion of VE was based on nothing.
Page 7 of my filter starts day 2, and I obviously push for his lynch based on analysis I had already made day 1.
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:29 Ace wrote:
yamato clearly wants a vigi shot to the face, so someone just end him. I'm gonna go do something productive like look for gif meems to spam once yamato has died and flipped Scum. GN peoples.
THIS IS WHAT ACE RESORTS TO, PEOPLE
NOT ACTUALLY RESPONDING TO MY POINTS,
BUT THIS
REMEMBER, IF I DIE, THAT HE IS MAFIA
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 14:45 getmoript wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2013 14:43 yamato77 wrote:On April 28 2013 14:29 Ace wrote:
yamato clearly wants a vigi shot to the face, so someone just end him. I'm gonna go do something productive like look for gif meems to spam once yamato has died and flipped Scum. GN peoples. THIS IS WHAT ACE RESORTS TO, PEOPLE NOT ACTUALLY RESPONDING TO MY POINTS, BUT THIS REMEMBER, IF I DIE, THAT HE IS MAFIA ![[image loading]](http://www.pentatransport.com/gallery/albums/album03/Tunnel.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/NIjl5vq.jpg)
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 15:02 getmoript wrote:
Yes yamato, Ace could be mafia. Doubtful but possible.
I'm just going to post that picture every time he posts.
Eventually you'll catch on.
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 15:07 VisceraEyes wrote:
I was tunnel ed in hard on Snarfs all game cause I was passed off that he tunnel ed in on me. CC agreed most of the day and was one of a couple people who switched to lynch Snarfs.
I clearly showed in my awesome case on you that game that you weren't as tunneled as you thought ;]
But yeah, Ace bussed Clarity. GG scum.
|
11589 Posts
On April 28 2013 15:09 getmoript wrote:
Right now, I really just want to flip yamato.
I want to flip too so town can win this game.
|
11589 Posts
Kripp stopped streaming
afk
vigi me plz
|
11589 Posts
Definitely would kill Palmar over BC
|
11589 Posts
My epeen would grow immensely if I was right about Sylencia being potentially mafia just from his vote post
I agree with his lynch, he is believably mafia.
|
11589 Posts
On April 29 2013 11:02 WaveofShadow wrote:
Why the fuck WAS grush killed last night? Actually I know. Inconspicuous 3rd party target, unlikely to be a threat to 3rd party or scum so just an easy town numbers reduction for 3rd party. Rayn was for sure the scum target.
Aaaaaanyway, gonna look into Sylencia myself.
Completely agree
The question is, why have scum's confirmed targets been Vivax and Rayn when BC/Ace/Palmar exist in the game? I agree with the analysis that someone wants to hide amongst the vets, because between the three of them, I have not a single solid town read.
And as far as I know, there's only one RB claim from last night, no? Are there any other claims?
|
11589 Posts
On April 29 2013 11:06 Ace wrote:
and now VE and the other scumbucket yamato show up. Something extremely foul is going on here. What kind of stupid plot are you running Palmar? You wont even vote for your target BC. why so willing to sheep so quickly? Is this a mega bus of sylencia so both of you can gain cred lynching BC the potential third party?
both of you buying each other's claims so quickly REEKS of scum play. just filthy.
Ace, are you sure you're not mafia?
Because you sure act like one.
|
11589 Posts
Pretty sure OO is town, too.
So if Syl is town, Shiao is mafia, because CC is insane.
Lynch Shiao?
Any way this turns out, I look baws from my analysis at the end of yesterday.
|
11589 Posts
On April 29 2013 11:16 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I could wrap my head around the idea of OO scum tbh.
Why?
|
11589 Posts
On April 29 2013 11:16 Ace wrote:
for fucks sake I hate all of you
we all hate you too,
it's okay
just go away
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
