|
On April 11 2013 01:34 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2013 01:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 11 2013 01:28 Mocsta wrote:
was taking a piss and had to ask this, cos its leading somewhere.
oats
who was added first
RO or MZ? MZ damn it. i was hoping the latter. That debunks what i wanted  Take 2: surely there is conversation in the QT regarding Austin? I find it difficult to comprehend a guy wanting to nuke austin; wouldnt have asked for either of you for your opinion - if town (like u say he is) If its a love fest like RO says it is.. then either u guys agreed Austin should be dead; or failed miserably to convince?
Its a love fest, IE there is no useful conversation inside ;P
|
where are you going with this sn0 man?
|
##Unvote: Sinani
##Vote: OO
Lol Anyone who wants to lynch me, why in the WORLD would I choose recruiting mason as scum? It basically wastes a pick/multiple KP to look like confirmed town.
Good trade? no.
|
On April 11 2013 15:40 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2013 15:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Unvote: Sinani
##Vote: OO
Lol Anyone who wants to lynch me, why in the WORLD would I choose recruiting mason as scum? It basically wastes a pick/multiple KP to look like confirmed town.
Good trade? no.
You drafted 3rd from last. I'm not discounting it.
There are at least 10 or more better scum roles than this.
|
On April 11 2013 20:09 Bill Murray wrote:
is austin alive?
for now.
Are you justice vig or not?
|
On April 11 2013 20:13 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2013 20:10 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 11 2013 20:09 Bill Murray wrote:
is austin alive? for now. Are you justice vig or not? I am too busy to be messing with plebians at this time I will not roleclaim. I may have been lying about my kp, I may not. We'll talk about that when I want. Your votes are on OO, and Vivax. Care to explain your thought process behind that for everyone? Because I am completely fine with your vote on Vivax, but I'm failing to see why you voted OO... Was it his post last page? He looked pretty town to me
Its cause I like to sheep dudes.
Also OO has been WAY GONE, no thread impact no nothing. Look at LX.
Im ok with sharrant otherwise though.
|
SnB totes town, look at red team after day 1, he almost got mislynched there too.
|
Yeah thats a really 'nice' claim for scum to take.
|
On April 12 2013 01:29 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 01:23 Oatsmaster wrote:
SnB totes town, look at red team after day 1, he almost got mislynched there too. Other gems from Oats including the word "totes":
So word choice means Im wrong? Im pretty sure I was wrong about artanis too, perhaps I forgot to use the word 'totes' to describe his alignment. My apologies.
|
shoot dudes austin.
I am in favor of shooting dudes.
Because if you are scum, you wont sit on your shot anyway.
|
On April 12 2013 01:51 geript wrote:
Don't shoot. It tells us you're town.
hes getting nuked.
Dude what.
|
On April 12 2013 02:08 geript wrote:
Look Austin. I won't mourn you. If you want to herd cats, whatevs. But at least herd both stray cats. You're treating me like dumb town but not him. That's suspicious in the least.
Because you are the dumbest person talking right now. Smart up or shut up.
|
On April 12 2013 01:57 Vivax wrote:
Question: S & B claimed that MZ is town america, but where's the D1 nuke then?
I can currently just support a shot on OO, he's scum.
Rereading Sharrant and BM now since MZ and S & B seem to be off the hook.
Does america have to shoot every day? I didnt read it like that.
|
Town Mocsta doesnt care about other players feelings.
Scum Mocsta doesnt randomly piss people off.
|
Also most recent scum game, Personality 2, he was really lurky and didnt arouse anyones suspicion ANYWHERE near like this.
|
Yeah actually BM's claimed role makes a lot of sense(for BM to be scum) with the janitor popped.
|
Austin, I tend to think that recent scum games, are close to what a player would do when he rolls scum, rather than past scum games a while ago.
|
On April 12 2013 03:10 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 03:05 Vivax wrote:
Mocsta is not scum he doesn't do abrasive shit as scum, go read Personality 2, he was nice and reasonable, and he didn't try to jump into your face with what he had to say.
Lynch ObviousOne. (1) I WAS SCUM IN THAT GAME WITH MOCSTA. I KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING THERE, I WAS HYPERAWARE OF WHAT HE WAS DOING THERE. (2) Mocsta absolutely can be abrasive as scum. In the same vein as your comment, go read Newbie 37. He was not nice and reasonable, he DID jump into your face, and he did a great job of executing the "destroy the thread with spam/harrassment" scum plan. Yes, a player will have tendencies as scum and as town. But anyone who mentions says "mocsta not scum because personality 2" is being lazy/close-minded/wrong. I have pointed you towards a specific game that you can find to see that you are wrong if you believe mocsta always plays scum like he did in personality 2. Furthermore, you are arguing with someone WHO WAS SCUM WITH MOCSTA IN PERSONALITY 2. As that game wore on, we had a very particular strategy, and we did not need to spam the thread or be abrasive, because TOWN was taking care of that. Heck. I was scum that game and only looked townie because I kept telling townies to quit crapping in the thread. That's how bad it was. Scum did not NEED to kill the thread that game.
Dude. I played scum in Ego. WAY DIFFERENT to LIX.
So yeah not accurate.
|
On April 12 2013 03:12 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 03:07 Oatsmaster wrote:
Austin, I tend to think that recent scum games, are close to what a player would do when he rolls scum, rather than past scum games a while ago.
Newbie 37 started on February 11 TL time. It less than 2 months old. It is not particular far away, and was within about ~3 weeks of Personality 2.
In number of games its a ton.
|
On April 12 2013 03:17 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 03:13 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 12 2013 03:12 austinmcc wrote:On April 12 2013 03:07 Oatsmaster wrote:
Austin, I tend to think that recent scum games, are close to what a player would do when he rolls scum, rather than past scum games a while ago.
Newbie 37 started on February 11 TL time. It less than 2 months old. It is not particular far away, and was within about ~3 weeks of Personality 2. In number of games its a ton. What do you mean by this, and by your comment about Ego or whatever? If you played differently in Ego than another scum game of yours, that supports the idea that there is no single way that a player plays scum --> i.e. scumMocsta is not necessarily passive mocsta. Also, what is this number of games thing? As best I can tell, mocsta played...one game in between those two at most? It's okay to look at game x but not a game that's two games behind x? It's okay to look at someone's MOST recent scumgame, but not their second most recent?
I mean that when you play more games, your view on the game changes and your playstyle changes, same as your meta. So games that are more than 5 games behind this one is not VERY ACCURATE in determining meta in my opinion, especially with the game I JUST played. My mindset was totally different between LIX and Ego, and I assume Mocsta's one is different between Newbie and Personality. Also newbie games play differently because you feel differently about the players in the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
