|
On April 09 2013 18:00 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 14:48 sinani206 wrote:
I first want to say that this thread is spammed up to almost the point of unreadable... This is not how Town wins games. Secondly, out of the current lynch candidates, here are my opinions:
VisceraEyes: I was leaning scum before and he hasn't really done anything to change my mind besides participating a little bit more. To be on the safe side, I'll say null with a red tinge.
Keirathi: Null atm, nothing pointing him at being scum, but don't want to say definitely townie so soon. I just played in RTP with him and he seems to be playing rather similarly, so if I had to pick I'd say town.
Restraining Order: Very difficult to read, so I'll wait to see more of him and on him.
StrongandBig: Actually looks like he could be scum. Playing very differently than he did in RTP and I agree with the cases made on him. He seems to be playing a typical earlygame conservative scum strategy, skirting discussion and leading people in the wrong direction. I'll slap my vote on him for now.
##Vote: StrongandBig Taking his play it safe slip in conjunction with the post above. Yam is right. Sinani is certainly scum How nice him and deconduo vote snb who had sights on ve. Guys. Next 2scum is sinani and deconduo.
Im pretty sure you are wrong.
But thats cause you are Mocsta and not cause your reasoning is bad  Cheers. 
|
On April 09 2013 18:14 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2013 18:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 09 2013 18:00 Mocsta wrote:On April 07 2013 14:48 sinani206 wrote:
I first want to say that this thread is spammed up to almost the point of unreadable... This is not how Town wins games. Secondly, out of the current lynch candidates, here are my opinions:
VisceraEyes: I was leaning scum before and he hasn't really done anything to change my mind besides participating a little bit more. To be on the safe side, I'll say null with a red tinge.
Keirathi: Null atm, nothing pointing him at being scum, but don't want to say definitely townie so soon. I just played in RTP with him and he seems to be playing rather similarly, so if I had to pick I'd say town.
Restraining Order: Very difficult to read, so I'll wait to see more of him and on him.
StrongandBig: Actually looks like he could be scum. Playing very differently than he did in RTP and I agree with the cases made on him. He seems to be playing a typical earlygame conservative scum strategy, skirting discussion and leading people in the wrong direction. I'll slap my vote on him for now.
##Vote: StrongandBig Taking his play it safe slip in conjunction with the post above. Yam is right. Sinani is certainly scum How nice him and deconduo vote snb who had sights on ve. Guys. Next 2scum is sinani and deconduo. Im pretty sure you are wrong. But thats cause you are Mocsta and not cause your reasoning is bad Cheers. Dude maybe this is best for post game But I'm really not digging your play style this game, I actually preferred oats from nomination. U were more aggressive, but talked less bullshit.
I thought you didnt like my 'disruptive' playstyle?
I dont really care which 'oats' you like, but I prefer town oats if it makes a difference to you.
|
On April 09 2013 21:57 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 18:28 Oatsmaster wrote:On April 07 2013 18:27 Palmar wrote:
list of probable townies:
gonzaw
geript
mocsta
vivax
that leaves me with 20 possible lynch targets. I really need to figure out more people who I don't think are scum. Why is VE not on this list, and why is Vivax on it? I know Oats is awful at mafia, but just how awful is he?
You played with me in Red Team.
Haha wrong everywhere.
At least I think you are town now,
1 DOWN LIKE 100 TO GO.
bleh, dudes better die or else this game be too hard.
|
On April 09 2013 23:52 deconduo wrote:To put mocsta out of his misery: Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 03:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Day 1 has begun!
Voting thread is going up now and the day will last til monday April 8th at 9pm est
Show nested quote +On April 09 2013 04:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Night 1
You have until 9pm est tuesday night.
Thats actually wrong. But good show yeah?
it wouldve been 1504.
Deconduo.
Reads please.
NOW.
|
On April 10 2013 01:50 Sn0_Man wrote:
I'm noticing an awful lot of people who feel the need to make sure EVERYBODY notices just how much they "contributed" to the lynching of scum, many of whom really didn't (or at least not nearly as much as they claim).
I mean, I'm as happy as the next guy that we got 2 scum but I'm not sure what the point of proclaiming your own greatness is.
I mean, caller kinda unilaterally showtimed artanis (with the help of gonzaw getting a bunch of votes on him) and then the emperor unilaterally lynched VE and that was that. Its pretty hard for us to know who's comments swayed the emperor but I hesitate to call day 1 anything more than a success for town perpetrated by 2 particular people (rather than town as a whole).
So any conclusions or are you shitting on town for any reason?
|
On April 10 2013 02:00 Sn0_Man wrote:
Conclusions: A lot of people are begging for recognition and I don't know why?
So you are shitting on the thread.
COOL BRO.
Want to be useful?
|
HAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHA
Can will kill sn0 man for being here and useless?
Also can we kill shevlocke for shooting MZ and basically doing what the WHOLE THREAD told MZ not to do?
Also can we kill BM for shooting confirmed TOWN Caller? I know BM does dumb shit. THIS IS THE DUMBEST SHIT EVER.
so he scum bros.
|
BM.
Lets take it slow.
Why would Caller(scum), use showtime(good power), to lynch Artanis(scum), with a really really really great power, assassin(good power)?
For towncred?
No towncred is worth that shit.
|
On April 10 2013 13:06 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 12:49 Oatsmaster wrote:
BM.
Lets take it slow.
Why would Caller(scum), use showtime(good power), to lynch Artanis(scum), with a really really really great power, assassin(good power)?
For towncred?
No towncred is worth that shit.
Let's say I'm scum and I kill scum town loves me
Yeah. But whats the point.
|
MOCSTA.
Write you. not u. PLEASE. Its way more readable.
Discussion on sn0 please
|
On April 10 2013 13:39 Bill Murray wrote:
I don't feel the need to give you any justification.
Anyone got a gun? PLEASE SOMEONE HAVE A GUN
|
Yeah sinani and Vivax it is.
I want to lynch snoman too.
Shevlocke maybe cause he LIED. I hate liers. Except when I do it, then its alright.
|
On April 10 2013 21:30 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 21:21 Oatsmaster wrote:Yeah sinani and Vivax it is. I want to lynch snoman too. Shevlocke maybe cause he LIED. I hate liers. Except when I do it, then its alright. Can you walk me through why Sn0_Man. I thought Keirathi argument for keep Sn0 was pretty sound.
Was that the 'he doesnt care what he posts argument? the too scummy too be scum argument?'
Cause that is not so good.
Its like ~~~ not ^^^
|
On April 10 2013 22:44 Mocsta wrote:Hi Everyone. I think we can all benefit by steering conversation more towards critical thought, and fleshed out thoughts. Instead of just saying "Person X" is scum. Let us create debate; detail the scum mindset, and justify the vote.If someone builds a case, and you disagree. Let us create debate; challenge the points, and work together to come to a well-reasoned conclusion
For example, ===================== Oatsmaster+ Show Spoiler [Re:Sn0_Man] +]Im still not sure why you think he is scum. On April 10 2013 21:36 Oatsmaster wrote:
Was that the 'he doesnt care what he posts argument? the too scummy too be scum argument?'
Cause that is not so good.
Its like ~~~ not ^^^ Yes, I am referring to the Keirathi "he doesnt care what he posts" argument. After a second review, I thought his points were of merit and showed a town confidence. Can you walk me through what you disagree with. ===================== BillMurray+ Show Spoiler [Re:Sinani] +On April 10 2013 22:16 Bill Murray wrote:
sinani has been pressuring people, and regardless if one of them is me, made a good case on strongandbig...
he hasn't been useless this game, like sn0_man, sharrant, obviousone, just to name a few off the top of my head Do you think SnB is scum? If not, why do you think the case is "good"? Regardless of whether the case is good or bad though; it was made prior to the Artanis case (i.e. very early game Day 1). Futher, Sinani never updated his vote from that pivotal moment in the game. Do you truly believe that SnB case was good enough to warrant leaving the vote their for an entire cycle? Please keep in mind, Sinani was up to date with the thread enough, to request Gonzaw use his day-vig to shoot "BillMurray". ===================== Sharrant+ Show Spoiler [Re:Keirathi] +Keirathi CaseI am very curious to hear your response to the issues regarding the assassin claim knowledge + vested interest in ascertaining blue roles.
Why are you so helpful in asking questions, but not helpful in making cases?
|
On April 10 2013 23:19 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On April 10 2013 22:44 Mocsta wrote:Hi Everyone. I think we can all benefit by steering conversation more towards critical thought, and fleshed out thoughts. Instead of just saying "Person X" is scum. Let us create debate; detail the scum mindset, and justify the vote.If someone builds a case, and you disagree. Let us create debate; challenge the points, and work together to come to a well-reasoned conclusion
For example, ===================== Oatsmaster+ Show Spoiler [Re:Sn0_Man] +]Im still not sure why you think he is scum. On April 10 2013 21:36 Oatsmaster wrote:
Was that the 'he doesnt care what he posts argument? the too scummy too be scum argument?'
Cause that is not so good.
Its like ~~~ not ^^^ Yes, I am referring to the Keirathi "he doesnt care what he posts" argument. After a second review, I thought his points were of merit and showed a town confidence. Can you walk me through what you disagree with. ===================== BillMurray+ Show Spoiler [Re:Sinani] +On April 10 2013 22:16 Bill Murray wrote:
sinani has been pressuring people, and regardless if one of them is me, made a good case on strongandbig...
he hasn't been useless this game, like sn0_man, sharrant, obviousone, just to name a few off the top of my head Do you think SnB is scum? If not, why do you think the case is "good"? Regardless of whether the case is good or bad though; it was made prior to the Artanis case (i.e. very early game Day 1). Futher, Sinani never updated his vote from that pivotal moment in the game. Do you truly believe that SnB case was good enough to warrant leaving the vote their for an entire cycle? Please keep in mind, Sinani was up to date with the thread enough, to request Gonzaw use his day-vig to shoot "BillMurray". ===================== Sharrant+ Show Spoiler [Re:Keirathi] +Keirathi CaseI am very curious to hear your response to the issues regarding the assassin claim knowledge + vested interest in ascertaining blue roles. Why are you so helpful in asking questions, but not helpful in making cases? Is this serious? Im the one who shot Deconduo... and I have been making cases all game. Please answer the questions I laid out. They are quite straight forward.
I absolutely knew that you would answer this way.
Taking the easy way out.
Who the fuck cares even if you singlehandly caught all the scum but one, IF you dont know who that one is and you keep asking questions to other people IN ORDER to get a read on the PEOPLE THEY are making cases on.
Terrible.
Who is scum Mocsta?
|
On April 10 2013 23:49 Sn0_Man wrote:BM is Justice Vig because he has essentially outright claimed it in thread a billion times but is somehow afraid of actually saying the words (hes asleep now so can't get any more from him ATM). I expect all night actions occur even if the perpetrator dies that night as well (as in the case of deconduo/janitor I think). In the case of a full-claim (which I'm not convinced is the right choice but I wouldn't mind seeing it at least begin) Yamato, Oats and Vivax are the first up (going with Justice vig BM for now, since he's asleep). If yamato and oats are around they can probably begin safely. I don't really care about yam but Oats I'd really like to see his claim
Because?
Im like 22nd. Whut.
|
I changed my mind.
I LIKE SNOMAN.
K.
Um so yeah Vivax and sinani.
|
On April 10 2013 23:56 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 23:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
I changed my mind.
I LIKE SNOMAN.
K.
Um so yeah Vivax and sinani.
##Unvote: ObviousOne
##Vote: Oatsmaster
I KNEW IT
so predictable mocsta.
So now its your turn to write a case right? Or am I wrong?
|
On April 11 2013 00:00 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 23:58 Oatsmaster wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On April 10 2013 23:56 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 23:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
I changed my mind.
I LIKE SNOMAN.
K.
Um so yeah Vivax and sinani.
##Unvote: ObviousOne
##Vote: Oatsmaster I KNEW IT so predictable mocsta. So now its your turn to write a case right? Or am I wrong? Nope. Don't need to.
Right, so I need to justify my scumread, but you dont.
Cool beans bro, cool beans.
Your credibility gone. just like *poof*
|
On April 11 2013 00:05 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2013 00:03 Oatsmaster wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On April 11 2013 00:00 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 23:58 Oatsmaster wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On April 10 2013 23:56 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2013 23:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
I changed my mind.
I LIKE SNOMAN.
K.
Um so yeah Vivax and sinani.
##Unvote: ObviousOne
##Vote: Oatsmaster I KNEW IT so predictable mocsta. So now its your turn to write a case right? Or am I wrong? Nope. Don't need to. Right, so I need to justify my scumread, but you dont. Cool beans bro, cool beans. Your credibility gone. just like *poof* This response is exactly why my vote is justified. Night guys.
Your opinion isnt anyone elses the last time I checked.
Im pretty sure you arent the only one playing the game.
you need to CONVINCE people. Right?
Am I doing this 'pressuring' right Mocsta? Trying to copy you, not sure if its working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
