|
my post above answers some of your questions about Jarjar, it's a rather weak argument against me that doesn't focus on whether i am scum or scummy, but rather how other people are more town or confirmed town, or they are a group where somehow there is only scum.
as for krafla's case on virtu. well it's interesting and takes many assumptions and it is somewhat wifom. overall i feel it's not a very strong case. yet at the same time virtu definitely needs some explaining and be at least relatively active, otherwise such inaction cannot be left unpunished
On March 26 2013 04:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:@ Rainbows:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 04:07 Rainbows wrote:
TRN seems like an iffy lynch for today. I think there is scum between virtu and NW if not both. I think the cases on raven are biased... Saying he is scum because he lynched frogon is stupid, and especially coming from NW considering he could have prevented the lynch.
Guy lets frogon get lynched.
Guy blames other guy for lynching frorgon.
Seems, you know, legit. What's biased about my case on Raven? @ nobodywonder:What do you think about the case on virtu? What do you think about JarJar's analysis on the night hit and his vote on you? Where do you think he is wrong and why?
|
so Rainbows, what are your other reads? at this pt, you've only really pursued me. and the other reads that you had are on dead townies: fishgle and frorgon. who are some other scum, or are scummy?
and virtu really needs to get posting.
|
^ this is in response to Rainbows
On March 27 2013 01:58 Rainbows wrote:
JJD, lol. I can tunnel virtu all day and do nothing, sit on my ass and have everyone else fight, or i can find the other scum. Something people in this game have no liking of doing.
As i recall the day hasnt ended yet. Chastising me for pursuing other reads instead of the afk guy is trololololly.
|
@krafla, what the heck was that post? or you really clueless with reads or just mafia?
you have a lot of hypothetical situations, saying that TRN and me are voting against each other to spread the votes. that doesn't make any sense - that just means one of us is going to get lynched and as a scum tactic, it's simply stupid. now also i know that TRN and me are not both scum, because for one I'm not scum, though I think TRN is scum.
and why the hell are you suggesting that TRN is cop and that he should cop-claim? do you want our cop to die? this is unacceptable
|
so JarJar, who is your top scumread of an active poster? a vote on virtu, just doesnt cut right now since its rather useless at this point. We can always switch votes and get virtu later today if unnecessary.
|
|
|
But don't forget TRN, you joined my quest against the nefarious nutter butter.
On March 22 2013 12:40 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2013 12:35 nobodywonder wrote:wooooooooo ~ exciting game so far ##Vote: geriptI want a nutter butter.  ##Vote: GeriptI'm eating one right now... and I am making up for all the times I didn't get to do this last game.
Speaking of contributions, yes I do realize I screwed up with not voting and I don't have that many posts, but still I'm trying to be more active to make up for tomorrow.
Still that virtu guy hasn't contributed at all, if you want to talk about contributions.
And in response to you
On March 27 2013 07:11 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2013 17:09 nobodywonder wrote:On March 22 2013 12:52 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Hey all, Don't worry I wont lurk @ all once the game starts rolling. Being how I've never played against any of y'all I have nothing to base any read off so I probably wont throw down a vote untill everyone's posted a bit. time to get it rollin' then JarJar or mesa annoyed by you. mesa angry. mesa point finger of suspicion on JarJarDrinks ##FoS: JarJarDrinks This is one of NW's only post day one that doesn't contain something about EmmaWatson or Geript. The other one is him calling out Jarjar's sheeping vote and upgrading to a hand of suspicion, Outside of this he calls out mine and Jarjar's logic a few times and comments that Virtu is infact suspicious to him but doesn't even vote. Next day: Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 02:14 nobodywonder wrote:
^ woo~ excitement. yee about to get lynched. maybe i can find scum now hopefully.
about the non-vote, i derped hard. I would have voted virtu, but I was out and I forgot... Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 02:31 nobodywonder wrote:well i got a feeling ##Vote: TheRavensNamei got a feeling that today's gonna be a good lynch On March 24 2013 04:09 TheRavensName wrote:
##unvote Raynpelikoneet
##vote: Frorgon
I can see that it is unlikely I will get a lynch off of Ray, and I'm starting to view him more like an aggressive townie like rainbows the more this goes on. I'm siwtching my vote to Frorgon, basically because hes lurking pretty had and acting suspicious and non contributing when he actually is here (Via pushing connection cases off of nothing.) Truth be told, your reminding me of arctic, someone who would probably get away if he lurked a little more and only makes himself look bad whenever he posts. I haven't posted against V simply because I don't think hes scum. I don't see a way to defend him, nor do I feel like I should, but I don't feel like I should go after him if I don't feel hes an issue. Raven killed Frogron. bolded words. strange. "I don't see a way to defend him, nor do I feel I should." what does this even mean? as a town mentality, it simply doesn't make any sense, why imply that virtu is town, and then mention no way to defend or should defend V. garbage filler post obvi. no need to mention virtu, and the explanation on frorgon is rather weak. lol he's suspicious, bad cases. nah, frorgon's cases weren't that bad, but at least he was explaining himself and I felt he was townie-ish. btw @Raven lehhsgo lynch geript and his nutter butter some other time aite ^^ I'm not sure what happened here but somehow I' m the one that killed Froron as opposed to the man who didn't vote, and now hes not voting for his suspicion? If he would have Virtu would be dead right now and Frorgon would be alive. But then he would have to have been responsable for killing someone, and apparently if hes not going to be MODKILLED for filure to vote when the rules say otherwise, why place suspicion upon himself if the Virtu lynch fails? REally if nothing else he should be lynched today for this reason alone. But apparently people are willing to let this go.. Show nested quote +On March 27 2013 03:35 nobodywonder wrote:
so JarJar, who is your top scumread of an active poster? a vote on virtu, just doesnt cut right now since its rather useless at this point. We can always switch votes and get virtu later today if unnecessary. And this, to me is the nail in the coffin. What does this post say? "I don't want to vote for my scum read right now, the one I kinda burried that I am against, but I would totally switch if the Raven lynch falls through and I need to save myself.
What nail in the coffin? I may switch to virtu, but as the thread going, it's rather useless at this point, cuz the man hasn't posted. It's rather useless for discussion and learning about agendas.
|
^ That is if Virtu is going to modkilled at this pt.
That guy should really post soon. So lemme just make sure.
Mods, will Virtu be mod-killed if he doesn't post D2?
Anyways, I say no nail because you are just twisting my words and reasons. So you lynch me cuz I'm a lurker. Nope, I've been active and trying to find scum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
