Personality Mafia 2 - Page 8

On March 16 2013 00:10 Oatsmaster wrote:
LOLOL WHAT.

Anyway makes foolishness scum more than ever.

On March 14 2013 01:13 kitaman27 wrote:
The following message has been sent by Plexa:

Ядерное оружие не являются подделкой.

On March 16 2013 00:18 austinmcc wrote:
Oats, I like to speculate so much because it's all part of the puzzle. I like the puzzle aspect of the game.

Based on your filter, and what people are saying, you're off the hook. It's not cause you don't make big paragraphs. It's because, often, I don't follow your leaps and suspicions. If I can't follow them, I tend to assume they're fabricated and you're scum just trying to be active/have a bunch of scumreads for mislynch targets.

My MAIN reason to think you're scum this game, as of now, is the prplhz vote steal. You fit that bill best imo. That's an important thing, that people need to not forget, but it's not the main issue for now. Bigger things afoot.

On March 16 2013 00:25 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Exactly cause it makes you look less bad.
And WIFOMWIFOMWIFOM.

We don't talk about this derp ability. We talk about reads now. Marv got a townie lynched, Foolishness defended him. Take your pick.

On March 16 2013 00:59 Vivax wrote:


I'll trust both hosts telling me it's a fact. If they trolled me I don't know, but that's the choice I make.

Did the hosts comment on the flip in personality? I don't think so cause it wasn't delayed as far as I grasp.

And if the hosts comment on it here it's reason enough to believe it. Else they would just drop the announcement and not comment on it.

On March 16 2013 01:58 Stutters695 wrote:

I'd rather let a regular vig do it so it isn't announced and it doesn't get rb'ed. Worst case if foolish lives we just lynch him again and coordinate to put a scummer in second again just in case it's an indefinite thing (I also can't know if the other person already locked in his shot but if he hasn't he can vote differently, we won't shoot and he can add you and we shoot tomorrow.

On March 16 2013 03:21 slOosh wrote:

Scaling back to 12 hours is a sensible and possible nerf. Hinting that it may be false while the OP remains true and the hosts both confirming multiple times it is true is not a sensible nerf.

On March 16 2013 10:42 DarthPunk wrote:


Waste time? I read from page 150 or so onwards as I was reading through the thread so I could at least be involved somewhat in current discussions. I don't think anyone would have preferred it if I had replaced in only to disappear for several days reading the thread. And as for saying I hadn't read the thread. Several people were answering with some variant of 'read the thread' to simple questions. So I politely informed everyone that I just replaced in and that this thread is enormous. So I won't be caught up for a long time. This quite frankly should have been common sense and yet I had to state several times that I had in fact NOT read the thread because apparently common sense is difficult.

Ironically. If YOU had read the thread or even my paltry 2 page filter you would know the answer to the second question.

But because I am nice I will not tell you to "read" and in fact answer your question politely.

Yes I think foolishness is probably scum because I think marv is town and I KNOW marv is a better player than me so Sheepy sheepy sheep sheep.

As for the check. It is incredibly unreliable as he had to announce it before hand which you and everyone should know already so I am guessing that question is some sort of test as to whether I, in fact, possess the common knowledge of everyone else?

On March 16 2013 10:42 DarthPunk wrote:
Waste time? I read from page 150 or so onwards as I was reading through the thread so I could at least be involved somewhat in current discussions. I don't think anyone would have preferred it if I had replaced in only to disappear for several days reading the thread. And as for saying I hadn't read the thread. Several people were answering with some variant of 'read the thread' to simple questions. So I politely informed everyone that I just replaced in and that this thread is enormous. So I won't be caught up for a long time. This quite frankly should have been common sense and yet I had to state several times that I had in fact NOT read the thread because apparently common sense is difficult.

On March 15 2013 01:43 DarthPunk wrote:
Hey marv. I am not going to get through everything I need to and as it's 4am I am rather tired. Could you be a dear and link me your case on foolishness and the main rebuttal?

On March 15 2013 08:59 DarthPunk wrote:


Yeah. I could read your filter but it would have to get behind 120 pages of thread I still need to read and several more filters before I get to yours I am afraid.

But fair enough I guess.

On March 15 2013 11:14 DarthPunk wrote:


Regardless of the timing, It is true.

As for not pushing anything, well I have only read 52 pages of a 160+ plus game I am not nearly up to speed. There is an almost certain lynch on foolishness that I am pretty much sheeping marv on while I catch up so I don't see the value in pushing anything whilst I am as ill informed as I am currently and certainly don't feel the need to do so just to keep up appearances.

That said if something so basic as the fact that scum don't generally try to kill themselves when, in fact, killing themselves is an antithesis to their very purpose in the game comes along; I don't feel the need to not state my agreement with it simply because the circumstances of my arrival have prevented me from contributing much prior to that

On March 15 2013 11:16 DarthPunk wrote:


I think yamato is town.

I think marv is probably town and I am sheeping marv while I catch up.

On March 15 2013 11:19 DarthPunk wrote:


Yep it's really difficult. No offense to everyone who wants me to 'read' or 'push a case' For me Bugs has not even been lynched yet so give me a break. K thanks.

On March 15 2013 11:27 DarthPunk wrote:


Yes, but Marv, and this is important, your filter is already 30+ pages. And I had to READ that marv. and i'll have to RE-READ it.