Personality Mafia 2 - Page 7

On March 15 2013 00:53 marvellosity wrote:


if you actually read my post, it should be pretty clear already that Foolishness isn't town

On March 15 2013 00:57 marvellosity wrote:


You know I like you a lot, so in the nicest way possible - I'm much more likely to be right than you, and you know that.

On March 15 2013 01:11 DarthPunk wrote:
Why is Oats calling Foolishness Town whilst continuing to have his vote parked on foolishness?

On March 15 2013 00:47 DarthPunk wrote:
So vivax. Why are you answering questions for oats? Oats are you calling yamato scum?

On March 15 2013 01:09 DarthPunk wrote:
Oats what is your case on Yamato? Why did you try and imply that Yamato was scum without actually saying it? Why did your town read on Yamato from earlier change? Why have you ignored every question I have asked you?

On March 15 2013 01:23 DarthPunk wrote:


Hmm. I don't think I have read or could read anything that would rationalise a vote on someone you have called town a few times now.

But forgive me. I replaced in 2 hours ago and have not yet managed to read every post in this thread. That is obviously my fault so I will try and do better.

You don't have a 'case'. You didn't even IMPLY having a case (although in my opinion that is implied when calling for a lynch) but you believe that yamato is scum correct? You surely must to propose him as a lynch target. If that is the case then you must have a reason for thinking he is scum. What is the reason?

Why did you try to imply Yamato was scum without saying so when he stated he skimmed the thread?

On March 15 2013 01:29 DarthPunk wrote:


I don't know if it is just me but I don't understand the last part. Also if you could direct me to the reason behind your call to vote Yamato I would appreciate it.

On March 15 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Is there a situation that both Foolishness and Marv are town and that we need to look elsewhere?

Like, YAMATO!!!!

On March 15 2013 01:35 marvellosity wrote:


Please explain your flippyfloppy Oats, I don't like it much. You've gone scum-town-scum with no reason whatsoever.

On March 15 2013 01:38 DarthPunk wrote:


why is Yamato scum?

On March 15 2013 01:44 Vivax wrote:
Oats if Foolish speaks the truth about being unlynchable then scum doesn't care if it's no-lynch today but town will still be in the dark after this day without having accomplished anything.

On the other hand they will have some more people to kill off tonight. Hint: Marv not dying + he has the excuse for it since Dandel keeps saying he will protect him.

If I can give you a hint for posting: Don't fall victim to get yourself dragged too much into conversations (It's ok at times). Do your own thing, don't get pulled into longish conversations about single posts like marv and darth try to get you into.

Go dive some filters, look at important moments during the game (lynch, nuke firing, night hits and their targets).

I often ask quick series of questions too (when I shouldn't) , it's normal at times but there are a lot of people in this game who only lurk in the last page of the game and don't pull out stuff from earlier pages. Those are people like marv and Dandel.

There have been a few times where the game has been properly readable cause people stick to writing long posts. Austin hardly ever spams, he's a fine poster.
This as future guideline if you have comments a la "Oh well you did that too in this and this game" then keep them to yourself we look forward here when it comes to pushing useful play.

On March 15 2013 01:48 supersoft wrote:
on the road: Part 1 reads:

yamato, acro, oats
are town.

this is my final stance on them.
i am curious though, why vivax wents for acro after i called his filter interesting; because i didnt call it interesting because of scummieness. acro actually has some useful contributions, that convinced me that yamato must be town.
acro himself is town, because he was flying successfully under every radar with useless play and shaped up immensly without any pressure.

my read on oats bases on page 0-130. his latest flipflopping however only shows his interest in lynching properly.
therefor it's still accurate!

On March 15 2013 13:33 Foolishness wrote:
As a final note, you are more abrasive when you're mafia than town, those filters I linked are proof of that. It's probably worth it for me to die so you guys can be convinced that what I'm saying is true at this point, cause I have no motivation for this anymore.

Yawn. Game too difficult.

On March 15 2013 14:41 yamato77 wrote:
...

Is scum really that easy to pick apart?

Ugh. Sloosh/Foolish/Vivax/X.

The rest of my time this game is devoted to finding X.

On March 15 2013 22:09 marvellosity wrote:


Bear in mind as well, supersoft had Foolish down as confirmed mafia. Wouldn't talk to him about that either.

On March 15 2013 22:23 Vivax wrote:
I do. I'm just not easily influenced by others just cause of what I think of them and prefer pushing my own thoughts.
My whole personality as town is basically anti-sheep except for rare occasions (I like the prospect of being right when everyone else was wrong lol)
So I think you mentioning me not getting influenced by supersoft isn't a good reason to claim I'm scum.

As for my reads, I am too afraid as scum to end up on the wrong wagon/side usually. They were wrong mostly cause I started from the scum yamato town Foolish premise (I still can't believe yamato could be town tbh) and then made connections from that point on.

However don't let me stop you rallying people for my lynch.

On March 16 2013 00:09 austinmcc wrote:

^

The nightpost DID say there would be an announcement...so I guess this is it?

I'm less worried about messing up one of the posts than this being some kind of broadcaster or whatever a "magic marker" does. Coloring people's names in wrong?