|
On March 11 2013 13:16 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 13:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 11 2013 13:04 slOosh wrote:
u kids so bad
a) yamato uses mod-confirm check day one on kurumi
b) yamato then day vigs mod-confirmed town kurumi
c) people complain and call yamato bad but don't vote him
d) yamato is getting away with shooting mod-confirmed town
e) yamato is getting away with shooting mod-confirmed town
f) yamato is getting away with shooting mod-confirmed town
srsly if anybody doen't realize this and considers themselves good, well, maybe you need to bend over to see just how low you really are.
##Vote: yamato Tell me why scum would modconfirm a townie? Please? cuz he can shoot him, and people like you let him get away with it why would town use super mod check on kurumi of all people? less posting more sheeping me SHEEP SLOOSH A CHANGE YOU CAN SHEEP IN MAYBE WE COULD SHEPE
Do you have any other reads? Or yamato is your only one.
|
On March 11 2013 13:18 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 12:53 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 12:48 Stutters695 wrote:
@oats: hiro has never witnessed my greatness, that's not surprising. Interesting he hasn't said anything about it since however. please help me young stutters I have a plan my brother it involves you telling me who you suspect who do you want to get the rope 'round their neck? I don't know who it is you want to smother. Hiro is not the traitor we seek today. More than this I can't really say.
Do you understand the question?
Prome is asking you who you want to lynch, not whether you want to lynch hiro.
|
sheepity sheepity sheep.
##Unvote
##Vote: Vivax
|
##Unvote
##Vote: wherebugsgo
WBG, can you start playing the game now that the 'rat' has died? Or are you intent on doing NOTHING?
|
Guys, Why you ignore my Hiro and Austin case 
Spoilered for your convience.
+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 12:10 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 10:52 austinmcc wrote:Hello everyone! I think you should vote austinmcc for Mayor. Or any other elected office. But mainly mayor. As mayor, I'll aim to keep a healthy thread environment. We have a lot of heavily-themed roles it seems, and a couple posting restrictions or flavor-lovers. Limericks and rats are nice, but there are a lot of other things that get lost when there is too much creativity and not enough scumhunting. So please be judicious with your silly posts. But the real benefit to electing me mayor is that I will lynch scum. For now, that means lynching slOosh or crossfire. I like those better than oats, although I agree that oats doesn't look very green here. But iirc I'm not particularly good at putting oats's actions together with his alignment. slOosh is a good townie, and generally active. scumslOosh is inactive. slOosh this game is... But the stronger lynch today is crossfire. I like the idea that some scum will attempt to hide within personalities, allowing them to play the game from a less-than-town angle and pass it off as part of the game. crossfire has done just that. He has talked his nonsense, and I enjoyed reading his posts. But the posts contain little/nothing. bugs's post had some logic in them. Others are roleplaying within the context of scumhunting. crossfire is just posting nonsense. At best he called hiro out for voting for "non-alignment reasons," but he hasn't called out any other bad votes and he didn't go anywhere with hiro. Call out his vote, blink away. Austin here wants to lynch 'lynchbait' basically, Sloosh has posted nothing, crossfire has also posted nothing. But here Austin is saying that posting nothing is scummy. Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 11:12 austinmcc wrote:snb, three things what are those BHs in the Foolishness pic holding? wbg's posts may ramble, but they rambled while making townie points (at times). Read his post about how rats work. It's not the most insightful thing ever, but it gave me a strong townie vibe on him, because he was still playing mafia while filling the thread with nonsense (unlike crossfire). oats does look bad. I like the point on reads more than the point on not following his own advice, especially within a game where everyone is playing as someone else. For starts, you look at the iamperfection/mocsta pushes from oats, but you miss this: On March 11 2013 02:31 Oatsmaster wrote:
LYNCH IAMP.
Why Hiro and not the other numerous people with 1/2/3 posts?
Also Hiro never pushed that idea as it was never brought up again. Oats still pushing iamp, before you post, in response to iamp finding hiro scummy based on hiro's wanting claims. Specifically, iamp made a case, and oats immediately jumps all over iamp. I dislike that, because he's not actually seeking discussion on those questions, he starts off with the all caps LYNCH IAMP, which makes it feel like the questions don't matter. He just wants to lynch iamp, for...making a case and scumhunting. There's also his posts on ver. Check these out: On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
I do not use the word expound.
Mocsta start playing the damn game.
What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv.
Who is your top scumread.
Ver's entrance is "unimpressive" and he has no posts after. Reads like Oats finds this scummy On March 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 10 2013 23:04 Acrofales wrote:
**VER'S POST WAS HERE**
Only scum or Drazerk ever tries to pull this stunt.
##vote Ver Thats a horrible reason to think someone is scum. Seriously do you think he is serious? Also arent you of the opinion that vets shouldnt be lynched day 1 unless scum claim in thread? But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote. On March 10 2013 23:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 10 2013 23:51 Acrofales wrote:
That's stupid. Ver dropped in to tell us he hasn't read his role pm. Now you can believe him, in which case he is probably worth keeping around. However the chance is bigger that he is NOT rping Drazerk and HAS read his pm. Now that means he is lying and giving himself an excuse to act any way he chooses.
Who needs excuses like that? Scum. I was looking forward to playing with Ver, but if he's scum, we should kill him. Or he was kidding, and roleplaying. Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far? Acro responds, and Oats downplays Ver's post. Ver has a whopping one post. And yet Oats still manages to have 3 different thoughts about it. Weird interaction, and weirdly inconsistent. Austin says I want to lynch Iamp for making a case. So he assumes scum never make a case which is blatantly wrong. He also focuses on the 'lynch Iamp', instead of the actual questions in order to make it seem like my post is useless. The best part is about my opinion on Ver. Is this scummy? Its just a factual representation of what Ver has done, There are no opinions in this line other than 'unimpressive' which I dont feel is me saying that Ver is scummy. Then he tries and says that I contradict myself. Show nested quote +But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote. Is this wrong? According to Austin, this makes me scum even though I am right because it somehow is different from the question I asked Mocsta. Show nested quote +
Or he was kidding, and roleplaying.
Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far?
Again, this is a different thought according to Austin. Is it? No, it isnt. Keep in mind Im asking all these questions about Ver in order to discern Acro's and Mocsta's alignment, nothing else. So ##Unvote
##Vote: Austinmcc
+ Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 12:40 Oatsmaster wrote:shlong. Lol. Anyway I also think that HiroPro is scum. Yes I am using the same quote I attacked Iamp for, so sue me. Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 16:55 HiroPro wrote:btw I think everyone should just say who they are. since there apparently aren't any risks to doing so and I don't fancy having to determine whether or not people are acting fake because of their personality or because they're mafia. On March 08 2013 21:59 kitaman27 wrote:The OP has been updated. I've removed the following statement:Warning: I heavily advise you to think twice before roleclaiming.
As with any game, role claiming will have consequences, however this statement kind of contradicts with the spirit of the game, hindering role playing if you are worried about revealing your personality. There will not be a conditional vig based on role identities present in this game. Same thing as Iamp, focusing people on personalities isnt good because its like rolehunting and not alignment hunting, so it distracts town from the real objective. Super simple stuff. Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 03:01 HiroPro wrote:
yo, unless one of them admits they were lying right now, we should be lynching between kurumi and bugs today. both of them have claimed chezinu - bugs's anagram is a an anagram for brown brotherhood.
at the moment, i'm leaning towards kurumi. in particular notice what kurumi says after he has gotten his role (but before his alignment), "this sucks". kurumi is a player who likes to play around and troll frequently. it's very unlikely that he would be unhappy about receiving chezinu as a role. the logical conclusion is that kurumi is a faker.
##Vote Kurumi
also to the people who don't understand why i would ask everyone to just flat out say who they are. this is in part because my personality dislikes shennanies like what's going on right now. it's not something that i care about personally much. Here Hiro is using the personality in order to finger someone as scum. He doesnt say anything about Kurumi's actions and supposed scummy posts but just hypothesized that since Kurumi is trolling this game, and he likes to troll and that he appeared to not like his personality at the start. Too many assumptions. So its scummy for trying to lynch Kurumi off absolutely nothing. Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 08:52 HiroPro wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote Stutters695
Forget about kurumi. if he's confirmed town then there is no point in talking about him.
lynch the commentator. his filter is short so i will not bother even quoting. all he can do is ask meaningless questions and complain about how people treat him. he has no opinions on anything of value. Going after an easy target here, Hiro summarizes Stutters filter but neglects to mention the fact that stutters almost always does this as town too. Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 11:18 HiroPro wrote:On March 11 2013 10:58 strongandbig wrote:
After oats, wbg is pretty clearly the next best lynch target. His rambling aside, the resolution to this kurumi thing do not make him look good at all. man what does this even mean. you thought kurumi was suspicious also right? so why does kurumi flipping a bastard town role make you more suspicious of bugs? Not reading the thread where it was stated more than once by more than 1 player that either Kurumi or Bugs were scum. Hiro doesnt try to convince people that Stutters is scum, just asks them HEY YOU IS STUTTERS SCUM? NO? aww.
|
Marv/Mocsta Opinions on Hiro and Austin?
|
Well I wanted to know what Mocsta thought about it considering that it could be construed as scummy
Nothing to do with Ver.
|
On March 11 2013 22:35 marvellosity wrote:
Alright, that sounds fine. Your filter is full of suspicion so I'm gonna call you town at the moment. Partly because I'm fucking desperate for town-reads this game.
Um Yay?
Why are you not pushing dudes considering you dont have a lot of town reads?
|
On March 11 2013 22:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
He's got a lot of 'null' reads. Duh.
VE VOTE FOR EVERYBODY!!!!!!
I dont see why WBG doesnt have like 15 votes on him. How is he town"?
|
On March 11 2013 22:51 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 13:18 Stutters695 wrote:On March 11 2013 12:53 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 12:48 Stutters695 wrote:
@oats: hiro has never witnessed my greatness, that's not surprising. Interesting he hasn't said anything about it since however. please help me young stutters I have a plan my brother it involves you telling me who you suspect who do you want to get the rope 'round their neck? I don't know who it is you want to smother. Hiro is not the traitor we seek today. More than this I can't really say. considering you haven't said much of anything maybe you should elaborate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Can anyone honestly say that it looks like stutters is scum hunting? He is Not This is a great lynch and should be getting a whole lot more attention then it currently is. What are you guys going to do when im dead when i will be unable to point these obvious things out to you since i will be a prime night target.
Can anyone honestly say that it looks like Iamp is scum hunting? He is Not very much
Why is your posting so different from your town games and so alike your scum games Iamp?
|
On March 11 2013 23:08 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 22:59 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 11 2013 22:51 iamperfection wrote:On March 11 2013 13:18 Stutters695 wrote:On March 11 2013 12:53 Promethelax wrote:On March 11 2013 12:48 Stutters695 wrote:
@oats: hiro has never witnessed my greatness, that's not surprising. Interesting he hasn't said anything about it since however. please help me young stutters I have a plan my brother it involves you telling me who you suspect who do you want to get the rope 'round their neck? I don't know who it is you want to smother. Hiro is not the traitor we seek today. More than this I can't really say. considering you haven't said much of anything maybe you should elaborate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Can anyone honestly say that it looks like stutters is scum hunting? He is Not This is a great lynch and should be getting a whole lot more attention then it currently is. What are you guys going to do when im dead when i will be unable to point these obvious things out to you since i will be a prime night target. Can anyone honestly say that it looks like Iamp is scum hunting? He is Not very much Why is your posting so different from your town games and so alike your scum games Iamp? Why do you have so poor critical thinking skills? If you want to make a case maybe you should go for it instead of just floundering around not doing anything. If you read my posts you would probably see why my posting could be somewhat different to someone that spams one liners and is extremely aggressive.
Critical Thinking skills are overrated.
Seriously you arent looking like town right now and I thought that that was the thing you always do as town.
No jokes, no spam. NOTHING.
Reads kinda like dieno from Duel except now its Iamp.
|
On March 11 2013 23:46 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 23:39 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 23:33 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 23:24 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 23:23 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 23:21 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 23:19 cDgCorazon wrote:LOL This is all I have to say to you Marv: On March 11 2013 23:08 marvellosity wrote:
Why is agreeing or using other people's arguments a scumtell?
Don't hammer me for something and then ask me why the same thing you are hammering me for is a scum tell. That's fucking stupid. I said I liked the case. You are looking way too much into that fact and you're just trying to shit up the thread. Where is the evidence I'm trying to shit up the thread? What's up with this ad-hominem? You've still given literally none of your own thoughts on Oats. I SAID I LIKED THE CASE AND THAT BnS HAD GOOD POINTS. IF I AGREE WITH THAT, PERHAPS I FEEL THE SAME ABOUT OATS.This stupid attack on me with you contradicting yourself = shitting up the thread. Which points are good? Which make Oats scum? How is Oats' play different this game to Hiro's game, or how is it similar to LIX where he was mafia? There were 2 points in the case: Oats goes after easy targets Oats gives advice but doesn't follow it What BnS said was given with evidence and they were both valid and well-supported. That's why I liked the case. While it gave me a slightly scummy read on Oats, Yamato is still my #1 scumread. I said that and that's why I did not vote with Oats. I would love to pressure Oats when Yamato dies. However, I need to go after one target right now because if I hunt multiple people I hunt no one. I didn't read LIX so idk how Oats played there. I don't see anyone complain to BnS about how Oats' meta was like this, so I don't even understand why it's only an issue when I agree with it. Marv is grasping for reasons to call me scum here, so I called it shitting up the thread. Again, how would you say his play differs to Hiro's game? Or does it not differ but that doesn't matter in this specific instance? I have to go but I can't say much so: Hiro is the same when it comes to going after easy targets Hiro has not given much advice so I can't say anything about #2 However, their play is slightly similar. A big lack of thread presence and a lack of scum hunting. Hiro would be someone else I would be ok with lynching after Yamato. (That brings the list of people to Oats, Hiro, and Acro-who hasn't contributed much besides overreacting to everything).
Oh my.
Why does scum have to be hard targets? I dont get it.
Explain in your own words how I have contradicted my own 'advice'.
Also its been like 12-18 hours since that case. Has anything changed for you Cora?
Also LOLOL I HAVE NOT SCUMHUNTED. LOLOLOLOL
|
Stop showing off your e-peen and play the damn game.
Crossfire you might die in 12 hours. What are you gonna do about it?
|
Wait wtf, how has BUGS DONE ANYTHING IN THIS GAME. Like how are you seeing scum bugs?
Every other weird poster has been somewhat useful. even slOosh has been more useful than Bugs. Town bugs is useful.
This bugs in not, and it bugs me.
|
On March 12 2013 01:16 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
Wait wtf, how has BUGS DONE ANYTHING IN THIS GAME. Like how are you seeing scum bugs?
Every other weird poster has been somewhat useful. even slOosh has been more useful than Bugs. Town bugs is useful.
This bugs in not, and it bugs me.
You seem to be applying for a position on my Panel. However, I am not convinced that you are a loyal constituent. Whereas other constituents have analyzed specific posts, specific lines, here is what you have done: Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 13:34 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: wherebugsgo
WBG, can you start playing the game now that the 'rat' has died? Or are you intent on doing NOTHING?
Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 22:45 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 11 2013 22:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
He's got a lot of 'null' reads. Duh. VE VOTE FOR EVERYBODY!!!!!! I dont see why WBG doesnt have like 15 votes on him. How is he town"? Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
Wait wtf, how has BUGS DONE ANYTHING IN THIS GAME. Like how are you seeing scum bugs?
Every other weird poster has been somewhat useful. even slOosh has been more useful than Bugs. Town bugs is useful.
This bugs in not, and it bugs me.
Quite the case, quite the analysis. You have made a couple D1 cases. You have accused a bunch of other people of not scumhunting, or doing this or that little thing. However, despite bouncing your vote around all over the place, you have it resting on a guy that you aren't saying much about. I think I like that you are attempting to sling mud at every possible person who could oppose me for mayor, but yet...there seems to be no method to your slinging.
Um so how is that scummy?
How am I supposed to make a case when all he says is LYNCH THE IMPOSTER/RAT/MOUSE ALL THE FUCKING TIME??
|
On March 12 2013 01:24 austinmcc wrote:
Don't read that as "you haven't made a case." Read it as "there ARE posts, even if you say wbg has done nothing." Yet you haven't looked at them at all.
I will continue to find people scummy who just disregard cryptic posts as useless. There are, at the very least, some thoughts in wbg's posts. See marv 's post above. See my post in response to snb yesterday, bugs had a somewhat neat post on how scum would be looking for targets, and why kurumi fit that bill.
wbg looks scummy. I don't know how scum wbg responds to pressure, and if this is how he does so, then he should hang. But you are flinging mud everywhere, either to try and be useful OR to try and be active/point to your suspicions later when we lynch scum. Your mud has no weight behind it though. It is very thin, mostly water. It's pretty clear from other posts that you can read wbg's posts and get something out of them, his filter isn't entirely devoid of content.
So do you think Im scummy or not? Im confused at this point.
If not me, then who is your top scum read.
|
Austin why do I need to make a case when its obvious from what Marv posted that WBG is scum?
Stop waffling and put your vote down!
|
Why are we not lynching WBG.
He martyred himself.
Why not vig crossfire? I think he is more of a coinflip than WBG tbh.
Also VIvax likely scum.
Also I gotta go and will be out for the whole day.
|
Still pretty sure Vivax is scum. Also that means that Foolishness is scum, which is hilarious 
|
On March 12 2013 15:37 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 15:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Still pretty sure Vivax is scum. Also that means that Foolishness is scum, which is hilarious Why does Vivax = scum => Foolishness MUST = scum?
Cause I would assume that he is good enough to not try and defend someone who is scum/not so townie.
Like if he read the two filters and called them different when in actual fact they are the same.
Its kinda like if a chicken farmer tells you his chickens are fine, but in actual fact they arent, you know that the chicken farmer knew too and was lying to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
