|
On March 10 2013 23:55 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:49 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 10 2013 23:42 Vivax wrote:I think it's better if we keep our roles to ourselves for the moment, just for the fun component but yeah marv looks pretty much like ve right now. I think that everyone who is contributing should have lower priority than those who are not posting but anyway only until we got everyone to post so we can be sure that we're looking for the mafia when they actually posted already ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) marv, ve what dou you think of my idea? Also im still posting from tablet which is pretty annoying so i will be able to play properly in about 6 hours when im back home. What is your idea exactly? Not personality claiming? Waiting for people to post? ??? Well yeah i think personality claiming doesn't matter at all it's just for fun except for the powers and we should probably just play like we're supposed to and focus on getting everyone to post. I think that putting the thought out there that people can't just lurk is a good start for that and anyway, waiting for people to post is pretty much normal during day 1 :p
Still not getting your idea.
Do you have any reads or are you still waiting for people to post. Also why are you not batshit insane?
|
Kurumi, You know Chez is actually useful as town right?
|
Kurumi, do you actually have any reads? Or are you just intent on trolling the thread.
|
On March 11 2013 01:01 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 00:08 Kurumi wrote: Hello guys, It is me, Chezinu! So I see we have started this game and I am really happy to play it. I will try my best to have fun! So how about we start having fun right now? I tried this last game, but I got cursed so it was a disaster... Write down three things! One is false, rest is true!
1) I am Chezinu. 2) I have not read my role PM. 3) I don't have a day power. This is 100% a Chezinu claim. Points 2 and 3 are mutually exclusive
What do you think it says about Kurumi?
Also is Ver your only scumread?
|
On March 11 2013 01:08 marvellosity wrote: I'm pretty much with risk on this one. I have no idea what Acro thinks he's doing with this Ver stuff. Ver pretty explicitly said he wouldn't have much time for the game until Monday as well. And yet Acro actually has his vote on him; he wants to kill potentially one of town's strongest assets. I can't really tell if this makes Acro mafia or just very silly.
Who is scum? No reads = scum.
|
On March 11 2013 01:21 prplhz wrote: I have a one shot ability to become immune to the lynch next day at the expense of my own vote. Any votes on me, and by me, will simply not count.
Any fucking reason at all why you decided to claim?
Yamato can you read anything from the posts?
marv dont ignore me
|
Nope I dont think what VE has done is exceptionally scummy.
Marv, how is asking for your reads a stupid question?
|
On March 11 2013 01:28 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 01:24 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 01:23 Acrofales wrote:On March 11 2013 01:20 marvellosity wrote: he didn't claim Chezinu, unless I'm missing something. He is posting like Chezinu, unless you know someone else who talks like that, posting like and claiming is a completely different thing. at the moment he's purposefully making himself at least somewhat unreadable, purposefully posting in a way that contributes less than he's able. Whether it's to do with his personality, i dunno, but those are the facts at the moment. In a game where your role is another mafia player, acting like one in particular is a claim in my book.
Why does this matter?
Why does WBG acting like Chez as you said, make a difference to your read.
|
On March 11 2013 01:28 yamato77 wrote: So Marv, out of Kurumi/Bugs, which one do you feel is more likely to be mafia, if either?
On March 11 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote: bugs is more likely, but that's not saying much at this stage.
I feel hurt marv, you answer other peoples stupid questions.
|
On March 11 2013 01:32 yamato77 wrote: My question wasn't stupid.
I feel like one of them is probably mafia, given the nature of their posting. One is almost assuredly hiding with the other in the "Chezinu" category of unreadable players.
It's a valid mafia strategy if we, as town, allow it.
So what do you propose, how do you determine the scummyness of one over the other? Since you feel that both cant be mafia and one probably is.
It is also a valid town strategy to avoid night kills.
|
On March 11 2013 01:36 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 01:34 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 11 2013 01:32 yamato77 wrote: My question wasn't stupid.
I feel like one of them is probably mafia, given the nature of their posting. One is almost assuredly hiding with the other in the "Chezinu" category of unreadable players.
It's a valid mafia strategy if we, as town, allow it. So what do you propose, how do you determine the scummyness of one over the other? Since you feel that both cant be mafia and one probably is. It is also a valid town strategy to avoid night kills. I never said both can't be mafia. But right now, we can only pick one to lynch, and I want it to be the one we're more confident with.
Are you proposing that we lynch 1 of them today?
Well the problem with that as scum, is that you cant really push anything, you stay in the shadows and arnt involved. So by process of elimination, you will probably get lynched eventually.
|
Why is it destructive? It isnt a vengeful trait. I really dont see the reason to claim now, if ever.
|
On March 11 2013 01:50 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 01:43 Oatsmaster wrote: Why is it destructive? It isnt a vengeful trait. I really dont see the reason to claim now, if ever. sigh There's a reason none of the good players really reacted at all, use your brain and you might realize it too.
k.
Mind telling me that reason cause Im slow and stupid?
Also your only contribution to this game is a ability claim. Want to help town more?
|
LYNCH IAMP.
Why Hiro and not the other numerous people with 1/2/3 posts?
Also Hiro never pushed that idea as it was never brought up again.
|
On March 11 2013 02:40 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 02:31 Oatsmaster wrote: LYNCH IAMP.
Why Hiro and not the other numerous people with 1/2/3 posts?
Also Hiro never pushed that idea as it was never brought up again. What? Do you need glasses. his low post-count wasn't the argument. And that he never brought it up again would only make it scummier however he might have just not gotten around to comment further on it.
Im confused. There are other people with just as scummy posts, why Hiro?
Also I dont think asking people to claim personalities is scummy, its just wrong and we shouldnt do it, if only to play the game how the hosts intended.
|
On March 11 2013 10:52 austinmcc wrote:Hello everyone! I think you should vote austinmcc for Mayor. Or any other elected office. But mainly mayor. As mayor, I'll aim to keep a healthy thread environment. We have a lot of heavily-themed roles it seems, and a couple posting restrictions or flavor-lovers. Limericks and rats are nice, but there are a lot of other things that get lost when there is too much creativity and not enough scumhunting. So please be judicious with your silly posts. But the real benefit to electing me mayor is that I will lynch scum. For now, that means lynching slOosh or crossfire. I like those better than oats, although I agree that oats doesn't look very green here. But iirc I'm not particularly good at putting oats's actions together with his alignment. slOosh is a good townie, and generally active. scumslOosh is inactive. slOosh this game is... But the stronger lynch today is crossfire. I like the idea that some scum will attempt to hide within personalities, allowing them to play the game from a less-than-town angle and pass it off as part of the game. crossfire has done just that. He has talked his nonsense, and I enjoyed reading his posts. But the posts contain little/nothing. bugs's post had some logic in them. Others are roleplaying within the context of scumhunting. crossfire is just posting nonsense. At best he called hiro out for voting for "non-alignment reasons," but he hasn't called out any other bad votes and he didn't go anywhere with hiro. Call out his vote, blink away.
Austin here wants to lynch 'lynchbait' basically, Sloosh has posted nothing, crossfire has also posted nothing. But here Austin is saying that posting nothing is scummy.
On March 11 2013 11:12 austinmcc wrote:snb, three things what are those BHs in the Foolishness pic holding? wbg's posts may ramble, but they rambled while making townie points (at times). Read his post about how rats work. It's not the most insightful thing ever, but it gave me a strong townie vibe on him, because he was still playing mafia while filling the thread with nonsense (unlike crossfire). oats does look bad. I like the point on reads more than the point on not following his own advice, especially within a game where everyone is playing as someone else. For starts, you look at the iamperfection/mocsta pushes from oats, but you miss this: Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 02:31 Oatsmaster wrote: LYNCH IAMP.
Why Hiro and not the other numerous people with 1/2/3 posts?
Also Hiro never pushed that idea as it was never brought up again. Oats still pushing iamp, before you post, in response to iamp finding hiro scummy based on hiro's wanting claims. Specifically, iamp made a case, and oats immediately jumps all over iamp. I dislike that, because he's not actually seeking discussion on those questions, he starts off with the all caps LYNCH IAMP, which makes it feel like the questions don't matter. He just wants to lynch iamp, for...making a case and scumhunting. There's also his posts on ver. Check these out: Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 22:21 Oatsmaster wrote: I do not use the word expound.
Mocsta start playing the damn game.
What do you think about Ver's unimpressive entry and subsequent no posts. Also what do you think of marv. Who is your top scumread.
Ver's entrance is "unimpressive" and he has no posts after. Reads like Oats finds this scummy Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 10 2013 23:04 Acrofales wrote: **VER'S POST WAS HERE** Only scum or Drazerk ever tries to pull this stunt.
##vote Ver Thats a horrible reason to think someone is scum. Seriously do you think he is serious? Also arent you of the opinion that vets shouldnt be lynched day 1 unless scum claim in thread? But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote. Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 23:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 10 2013 23:51 Acrofales wrote: That's stupid. Ver dropped in to tell us he hasn't read his role pm. Now you can believe him, in which case he is probably worth keeping around. However the chance is bigger that he is NOT rping Drazerk and HAS read his pm. Now that means he is lying and giving himself an excuse to act any way he chooses.
Who needs excuses like that? Scum. I was looking forward to playing with Ver, but if he's scum, we should kill him. Or he was kidding, and roleplaying. Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far? Acro responds, and Oats downplays Ver's post. Ver has a whopping one post. And yet Oats still manages to have 3 different thoughts about it. Weird interaction, and weirdly inconsistent. Austin says I want to lynch Iamp for making a case. So he assumes scum never make a case which is blatantly wrong.
He also focuses on the 'lynch Iamp', instead of the actual questions in order to make it seem like my post is useless.
The best part is about my opinion on Ver.
Ver's entrance is "unimpressive" and he has no posts after. Is this scummy? Its just a factual representation of what Ver has done, There are no opinions in this line other than 'unimpressive' which I dont feel is me saying that Ver is scummy.
Then he tries and says that I contradict myself.
But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote. Is this wrong? According to Austin, this makes me scum even though I am right because it somehow is different from the question I asked Mocsta.
Or he was kidding, and roleplaying.
Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far?
Again, this is a different thought according to Austin. Is it? No, it isnt. Keep in mind Im asking all these questions about Ver in order to discern Acro's and Mocsta's alignment, nothing else.
So ##Unvote ##Vote: Austinmcc
|
On March 11 2013 12:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: This just in, Oats softclaimed scum. This just in, BC is being an idiot.
|
shlong. Lol.
Anyway I also think that HiroPro is scum. Yes I am using the same quote I attacked Iamp for, so sue me.
On March 10 2013 16:55 HiroPro wrote:btw I think everyone should just say who they are. since there apparently aren't any risks to doing so and I don't fancy having to determine whether or not people are acting fake because of their personality or because they're mafia. Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 21:59 kitaman27 wrote:The OP has been updated. I've removed the following statement:Warning: I heavily advise you to think twice before roleclaiming.
As with any game, role claiming will have consequences, however this statement kind of contradicts with the spirit of the game, hindering role playing if you are worried about revealing your personality. There will not be a conditional vig based on role identities present in this game.
Same thing as Iamp, focusing people on personalities isnt good because its like rolehunting and not alignment hunting, so it distracts town from the real objective. Super simple stuff.
On March 11 2013 03:01 HiroPro wrote: yo, unless one of them admits they were lying right now, we should be lynching between kurumi and bugs today. both of them have claimed chezinu - bugs's anagram is a an anagram for brown brotherhood.
at the moment, i'm leaning towards kurumi. in particular notice what kurumi says after he has gotten his role (but before his alignment), "this sucks". kurumi is a player who likes to play around and troll frequently. it's very unlikely that he would be unhappy about receiving chezinu as a role. the logical conclusion is that kurumi is a faker.
##Vote Kurumi
also to the people who don't understand why i would ask everyone to just flat out say who they are. this is in part because my personality dislikes shennanies like what's going on right now. it's not something that i care about personally much. Here Hiro is using the personality in order to finger someone as scum. He doesnt say anything about Kurumi's actions and supposed scummy posts but just hypothesized that since Kurumi is trolling this game, and he likes to troll and that he appeared to not like his personality at the start. Too many assumptions. So its scummy for trying to lynch Kurumi off absolutely nothing.
On March 11 2013 08:52 HiroPro wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Stutters695
Forget about kurumi. if he's confirmed town then there is no point in talking about him.
lynch the commentator. his filter is short so i will not bother even quoting. all he can do is ask meaningless questions and complain about how people treat him. he has no opinions on anything of value. Going after an easy target here, Hiro summarizes Stutters filter but neglects to mention the fact that stutters almost always does this as town too.
On March 11 2013 11:18 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 10:58 strongandbig wrote: After oats, wbg is pretty clearly the next best lynch target. His rambling aside, the resolution to this kurumi thing do not make him look good at all. man what does this even mean. you thought kurumi was suspicious also right? so why does kurumi flipping a bastard town role make you more suspicious of bugs? Not reading the thread where it was stated more than once by more than 1 player that either Kurumi or Bugs were scum.
Hiro doesnt try to convince people that Stutters is scum, just asks them HEY YOU IS STUTTERS SCUM? NO? aww.
|
On March 11 2013 12:41 Promethelax wrote: bugs call K-room a scum but when he is killed and confirmed a-1 bugs disappears he says nothing here his mislynch has been undone
when I show my cat a playerlist it is at bugs which she begins to hiss her reads are astute my kitty is cute she says that bugs is a bish
WBG has hidden in his role he pretends to search for the mole but when his chosen townie is shot his contributions are less than not now WBG's sharp wit has gone null
Agreed, I would be down with a WBG lynch. Hehe kitties.
|
On March 11 2013 13:04 slOosh wrote: u kids so bad
a) yamato uses mod-confirm check day one on kurumi b) yamato then day vigs mod-confirmed town kurumi c) people complain and call yamato bad but don't vote him d) yamato is getting away with shooting mod-confirmed town e) yamato is getting away with shooting mod-confirmed town f) yamato is getting away with shooting mod-confirmed town
srsly if anybody doen't realize this and considers themselves good, well, maybe you need to bend over to see just how low you really are.
##Vote: yamato
Tell me why scum would modconfirm a townie? Please?
|
|
|
|