EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXVIII - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
Either way, after refining my reads my top 2 targets are Krafla and Rainbow, just in case I die tonight. I think Rainbow's voting pattern is a bit odd. Krafla just isn't making much sense and he was on NW as well N1 and I have a strong town read on NW and had it all game long. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On March 13 2013 11:54 TheRavensName wrote: I'm wondering what this actually means.... WoS was almost certain he was saved by a jailkeeper night one, and Krafia said he was normal role blocked and seemed to me to at least be soft claiming blue and leaving small bread clumbs. This could confirm Krafia as what he said... or it could not I guess, but its something to consider ant it? To really evaluate that we would have to know how many roleblocks there were last night. I agree that WoS was saved night 1, but if there aren't 2 roleblocks today then we can assume that he was lying. Your thoughts? | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
##vote OmniEulogy | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
You seem to share my distrust of Omni. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On March 14 2013 01:57 Frorgon wrote: I don't see how Rainbows looks suspicious right now Raven. There is no connection between him and Omni. Now if Luneth somehow flips town, as I've said Omni starts to look innocent and then Rainbows would have the same problem as Omni has right now, tunneling votes on innocent people. If Luneth is town then Geript and Rainbows are scum. Otherwise the two scum are Luneth and Omni. You seem to agree about Omni, but I don't think we learn as much if we vote him today, and a mislynch on Omni hurts us a lot more than a mislynch on Luneth. I don't think that any of this makes sense. How are you drawing these conclusions? | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On March 10 2013 12:11 OmniEulogy wrote: the thing is WoS, he proved himself scummy because he sheeped me and voted Frorgon. Funny how he doesn't seem to call out Rainbows because of his vote for Frogon. Rainbow's response to the terribad Frogon case: On March 09 2013 03:46 Rainbows wrote: This just in: Omni is town. I agree with the sentiment that this lynch is going too smoothly. Zero opposition. TOWN: Consider targets like ChewOnStu and Frogron. Good case by Omnizzle here. I don't see how that's either a good case, an effective post or anything close to making Omni town. I also don't see the point in flat out calling someone town what 10 pages into day 1 is effective or useful. The only people who need to be thought of as town are scum. Omni's #1 scum read seems to be based on activity alone. If that's the case then why would he disappear for 2 days once the pressure was off of him? I really just don't see how Omni is town. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On March 14 2013 09:20 MLuneth wrote: I assume this is what you want? No, if you're going to make a case, make a case; all you made we're some points most of which Sn0 already pointed out. I demand more. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On March 07 2013 11:14 OmniEulogy wrote: I think policy lynches should be used as a last case scenario, if we are stuck at the end of D1, lynch the scummiest lurker. I've been thinking a while and I think this is the main reason why I'm suspicious of Omni. At the end of D1, Artctic was clearly the scummiest lurker around IMO by a wide margin. The points that Raven and WoS re: Arctic had made were pretty clear. Yet, throughout OE's filter even from early on he seems to be defending Arctic and deflecting to Taco. From a town perspective, I can understand why OE found Taco as many of us did, but what I cannot understand from a town perspective ESPECIALLY using 'scummiest lurker' as a guide is why OE would try to shift votes toward Taco who was FAR less scummy that Arctic. I can understand why, from a town perspective, he would want to question seemingly random votes. However I cannot understand why from that viewpoint he would seemingly focus more on random votes on Arctic more than other seemingly random votes. The last point that I can't understand from a town perspective is why he would stop pressuring a lurker to stop lurking once they posted a little bit. His premise is that lurkers are bad for town which is a simple and straight forward position to take from either side. Yet now he's completely lurks. If he (as town) really wants to push people to not lurking, then there is no reason to stop pushing them. From a town perspective with this basis he should be trying hard to fight against lurkers and pressuring them constantly. However, I don't see him doing that at all. While his filter is longer, it doesn't look to me that he's doing more than trying to appear active and helpful. This is the basis of scum: he doesn't follow through on his perceived 'town' agenda--This is scum mentality. He also doesn't try to push his 'town' agenda (scummiest lurker) against the obvious target--Arctic--because it goes against his actual agenda of keeping Scum alive. This makes him Scum. Vote OE. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
| ||
