@Cor:

First, sylencia is not up for lynching today is he? So what is your point?

************* reads cor's filter ***************

Ok, so in the only part of you filter where you do talk about why you're voting for adam, you call adam town more times than you actually call him scum. Do you think he's scum or what? You keep going on about how both the lynch candidates are probably town, and what good does that do us? Why won't you help figure who we should vote for?

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 04:13 GMT

#929

On February 27 2013 12:58 iamperfection wrote:
by the way for you information whores out there if you actually want information my plan gives us the most infromation.

We get to know kier's and we get to know adam's alignment

how much more information could you want!!!!

information is fine, but having knowledge of their alignments will do us no good if we don't try to decide which of them we'd rather kill first. so i think we should save double lynching for later, and see what the majority would say if we were only allowed to lynch one of them

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 04:21 GMT

#931

my guess would be 4-ish. it might depend on if there's a 3d party or not

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 05:42 GMT

#940

cor, this looks like the main point of your argument:

On February 27 2013 14:15 cDgCorazon wrote: The fact that you still have not changed your meta makes you look REALLY scummy.

that right?

that's pretty weak.... why are you imposing that he change his meta to match a specific standard of your choice?

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 05:57 GMT

#942

idk what my read on him is. but to your point, couldn't the same thing be said about one of the games where he flipped town? it's your main reasoning for why you think he's scum and i think you should admit that it's pretty weak

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 07:56 GMT

#979

yamato, i say if they are both town then it's a lose-lose trying to figure out which one to lynch. what you are describing is voting on a "lose-lose slightly less" scenario. I think we would have more to gain by lynching on the basis of which one is more likely to flip red. if one of them is red, voting on the basis of saving the better player is stupid.

I'd rather vote based on the 'lose-win' scenario than the 'lose-lose slightly less' scenario.

So do you have anything new to add to the keir vs adam discussion, focusing on which of them could be scum?

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 16:36 GMT

#1043

[b]##unvote[b]

double lynch

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 16:36 GMT

#1044

##unvote

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 16:42 GMT

#1050

i like to lynch while i lynch

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 17:02 GMT

#1066

if we kill adam too, nobody will dare to shoot early from now on

his desire to duel seems to have some sort of win-con type motivation. it's not like he and keir were really going at each other at the time. keir was not pushing adam veyy hard. adam volunteered to duel keir in my place... way before enough people had commented on the original idea of thrawn vs keir

if you look at the circumstances, the motivation for a townie to do what he did doesn't seem to be there.

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 17:08 GMT

#1071

conquer your fears and double lynch

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 17:17 GMT

#1077

why should lynch adam

-we're in a closed 15 player setup. it's a little expected that there might be a third party. i've personally seen people lynch 3p reads and they flip 3p

-you can't be too certain that keir is scum. if keir flips town, the thread will probably waste time on adam until he eventually gets lynched at some point later on

-this is an excellent example of a time when you actually need to policy lynch just to keep games playable. imagine if this happens again? every day? you've been bitching about how shitty the lynch is, so here is you chance to put a stop to it

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 18:04 GMT

#1093

i wanna know what keir and adam think about a double lynch

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 19:40 GMT

#1122

bro u wanna fight

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 19:49 GMT

#1126

alderan, you just tried to discredit the double lynch idea through my association with it without actually calling me scum. there is nothing in your filter about why you think i'm scum other than what happened most recently with the double lynch suggestions. so far you have hinted or implied me being scum several times but you have never said why or outright called me scum. so i want to know if you're wanting to fight or something

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 20:15 GMT

#1133

I think that's 6. I'm considering voting for keir but I'd want some assurance that we're not going to waste an extraordinary amount of time on adam if keir flips town.

imo it's much better to just get it over with and flip them both now

please don't vote based on trying to prevent a double lynch, especially not right now. a doulble lynch can't happen for several more hours, there is still more time.

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 21:00 GMT

#1158

On February 28 2013 05:49 Acrofales wrote:
Hi Thrawn

That's my first conclusion from this lynch.

yeah sorry for the bad start. i had weekend college, and i was stoned for the first time in awhile... both of which made this game hard to take seriously at the beginning

there are some good things that came out of this apart from flipping scum. imo we have almost confirmed adam as not scum. (myself probably too) and there is a wealth of information in the posts from the dueling phase. i've also aquired some pretty strong town reads throughout D1. i'm quite happy about that bit. i'll post more later but for now......

+ Show Spoiler +

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 21:29 GMT

#1162

right now my list of people that might be scum is:

hapa
acro
oats
dieno
snarfs
syl

that's in no particular order. i'll try to put it in order later. i don't think i'd be ok with lynching anyone outside of that unless we get a couple mislynches first

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 21:41 GMT

#1175

hapa could be scum becuase I can't set aside the possibility that he could have been bussing. he didn't seem to be too committed to his vote for keir. at the time, his vote actually made me scared to lynch keir because of how passive hapa was about it. originally I was operating under the assumption that I was guaranteed to find scum out of hapa/acro/keir. Imo acro is much more suspicious than hapa, but keir flipping scum relives some of the paranoia that either acro/hapa could be scum. I doubt I'll feel like pushing to lynch either of them unless we get a few unexpected mislynches.

iamp is pushing the right thing every time I look at him and he looks pretty townie besides that

not alderaan because he was being very vocal about pushing a keir lynch over letting a double lynch happen. i'm reading his filter right now and he looks like someone who had several reads wrong and was legitimately surprised by keir flipping red.

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

February 27 2013 21:52 GMT

#1180

and yeah I think I also want the deino vs slyencia duel

Deino/Syl: Do either of you think the other person deserves to be lynched and would you be willing to duel them?