/in
Themed Game Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
/in | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 09 2013 18:09 Blazinghand wrote: I think wbg is also talking about people who don't play the game seriously but instead just lean on roles when playing. When I make a themed game like Witchcraft Mafia, I try to keep the underlying setup and roles as vanilla and straightforward as possible. Of course, you get games like Age of Empires in which there isn't really scumhunting, how can you say that when you got lynched for playing like total mafia :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 10 2013 17:14 Mocsta wrote: I actually assumed he was talking about Mr.CC Well look its simple 2game cap. I would prefer this game over the other second game. But if its a dog act to choose one over the other, I shall stay in the other. Im not fussed either way. I'm sure the guy down as replacement in your newbie game wouldn't mind starting instead of you? Maybe look at that | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 12 2013 12:45 gonzaw wrote: I better not see any "almost standard" role here, like I saw in some previous PTP. If your role doesn't need you to post in tongues in the thread to summon Cthulhu so you can gain +1 Dexterity to kill your enemies all the while you need to seduce a certain player, then don't even bother making a role in the first place (if you need to seduce a player I volunteer!) my imagination isn't made for this and now you're putting me under all this pressure. Stop it t.t | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 13 2013 10:32 randombum wrote: Hi, I'm not scum. Ah. Let me colour you green immediately. Thanks qtpie <3 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 13 2013 13:52 randombum wrote: I'm not too sure I buy your case BH. If you read Oats statement from the point of view where its already decided by town to pick instant majority, (which I think this town has.) then his reasoning makes sense. He lists the first negative thing to come to mind and then says a little bit more, but basically he says its worse and dismisses it. Also a lot of your posts can be considered spammy/troll -snip- While not necessarily trollish in itself you were feeding/playing along with the trolls All in all however, I thank you for generating discussion. Hello sir, I greet you most gracefully to this fine establishment. Which liquor would you like to partake in? May I take your coat? Do you mean to amuse us with your delightful wit and piercing discourse, or merely lavish praise on others as a method of ingratiating yourself? On February 13 2013 14:21 iamperfection wrote: also top scum read is marv he seems bored already and had nothing useful to say. Verily, you do not know me well, young squire. On February 13 2013 21:13 Dandel Ion wrote: Also also, marv is scum. I see you aspire to continue your fine form from our previous encounter! Onwards! Let me sit you fine fellows down, and relate to you a story. There was once upon a time a young carefree lady, named Mandy Moats. She tittered and giggled, and would not cook in the kitchen as a proper lady would. Truly, she distanced herself from her local community of upstanding citizens, and they looked upon her ways and called her a witch! But when she was thrown in the lake, she drowned and did not float - she was not a witch. Let us not jump to hasty conclusions once again, fine sirs. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
I am enjoying my cigar, enjoying the discourse, and assimilating the knowledge it gives me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 13 2013 23:30 iamperfection wrote: although why marv is trying to impersonate chezinu right now i dont understand same goes for krumi talking in code for some reason. Before I entered this establishment, I talked to at least one gentleman, perhaps two, regarding my intentions to enjoy my bourbon and cigars here, as well as fulfilling my traditional duties of expelling the uncouth. Perhaps I will be vouched for, perhaps not. Nonetheless, we will escort unseemly gentlemen from the premises after due relaxation. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 13 2013 23:40 iamperfection wrote: so whats your plan this game? you must have one by now no? On February 13 2013 22:17 marvellosity wrote: I am enjoying my cigar, enjoying the discourse, and assimilating the knowledge it gives me. On February 13 2013 23:35 marvellosity wrote: Before I entered this establishment, I talked to at least one gentleman, perhaps two, regarding my intentions to enjoy my bourbon and cigars here, as well as fulfilling my traditional duties of expelling the uncouth. Perhaps I will be vouched for, perhaps not. Nonetheless, we will escort unseemly gentlemen from the premises after due relaxation. On February 13 2013 22:08 marvellosity wrote: Hello sir, I greet you most gracefully to this fine establishment. Which liquor would you like to partake in? May I take your coat? Do you mean to amuse us with your delightful wit and piercing discourse, or merely lavish praise on others as a method of ingratiating yourself? Let me sit you fine fellows down, and relate to you a story. There was once upon a time a young carefree lady, named Mandy Moats. She tittered and giggled, and would not cook in the kitchen as a proper lady would. Truly, she distanced herself from her local community of upstanding citizens, and they looked upon her ways and called her a witch! But when she was thrown in the lake, she drowned and did not float - she was not a witch. Let us not jump to hasty conclusions once again, fine sirs. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Young Oats is impulsive and at times ill-informed; nonetheless his discourse since entering this establishment has not made me believe his intentions are ill. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 13 2013 23:50 Dandel Ion wrote: Would prefer to lynch marv though. Truly, it is not of great ease to discern whether you let past grudges affect your judgement in the present. Your wilful attacks on young Oats and my good person are at best badly informed and reasoned, at worst malicious. I am curious if any other fine gentlemen have views to espouse on the matter. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 13 2013 23:59 Dandel Ion wrote: You are saying I am wrong now because I was wrong last time. Which is suboptimal reasoning at best, considering that were you town, you would think I am wrong because you'd be town this game. Instead, you have to invoke the memory of days past. That is a mindset one may only have when strolling through the red light districts. These are the extent of your claims against my good person: On February 13 2013 21:13 Dandel Ion wrote: Also also, marv is scum. On February 13 2013 23:50 Dandel Ion wrote: Would prefer to lynch marv though. I do not speak untruth when I declare them badly informed and badly reasoned. Or perhaps I do speak untruth - perhaps not reasoned at all, would be a more accurate appraisal, sir. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 14 2013 00:16 iamperfection wrote: marv was krumi one of the guys you talked to pregame about trolling all day? I find his posts devoid of any actual content. Says stuff is weird but doesn't bother to say if they are alignment indicative at all. im thinking scum on him I have not had previous discourse with the gentleman about my conduct. I would like to inform you that the gentleman known as Kurumi has a penchant for the offhand - this is not an unusual occurrence. Perhaps, you may ask me, in the past in these circumstances, was he good, or evil? The answer, squire, is both, therefore I am unsure of what conclusions to draw so early. His question to kitaman indicated an incorrect appraisal of the available discourse, but his interest in Count Cheesecake perhaps has some merit. While the loudest of the gentlemen make merry, we must not forget the quiet gentlemen who have not appeared or lurk in the corner; gentlemen such as Count Cheesecake, gonzaw, Hassybaby, Sylencia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 14 2013 00:32 Oatsmaster wrote: So austin made a really weird post defending me/dandel. Any thoughts? Were you referring to this nugget, young Oats? On February 14 2013 00:21 austinmcc wrote: I don't know why you're so concerned with this, but you don't need to be. It's early and there's not a massive wagon on you. The number of people with town/scum reads on you does not determine your alignment. You don't magically become town because there are townreads on you. Dandel Ion doesn't seem to be winking you out of existence because of his scum read. So for now, reads on you aren't that important and shouldn't be eating up thread space like this. If so, I do not believe you are interpreting this gentleman's thoughts in the correct manner. However, Gentleman austin gave the air of wariness regarding young Oats, and yet has rescinded from this position, or so it would seem. I am curious whether the gentleman was satisfied with what he heard from young Oats. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On January 09 2012 15:49 Incognito wrote: [*]Priority #1: Establishing Your Innocence | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 14 2013 04:57 gonzaw wrote: Kay im back I would like to kill randombum today. Stuff he posted seemed too "neutral" and shit, specially that "wall of text" about BH. Other than that maybe kill BH, he's being his usual trolly scum self, specially with that bad case on Oats. I know you usually to be a gentleman of many words; the Captain of Debates (Cods). Yet your discourse thus far has been sadly limited, one might say you have given up your place and become the Captain of Rare Pronouncements (Carps). Is the gentleman not amiable to great discourse with his colleagues? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 14 2013 05:09 gonzaw wrote: I skimmed the game and those are my first impressions. Everything else is null and some pointless discussions. marv, is this thing of yours a post restriction or are you doing it intentionally? Truly this does not sound like the same gentleman excited to enter this establishment; the excitement is gone. What happened at the door, I wonder? ##Vote: gonzaw | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 14 2013 23:12 iamperfection wrote: the wagon of justice feels better about kurumi's contributions(aggressiveness and speaking some sense) the wagon of justice now puts its full weight behind a stutters lynch. lets see if we can make him "catch up ". ## vote stutters It is hard to ascertain whether this 'wagon of justice' is truly a belief that Stutt-utt-utters is of evil intent, or merely rough and tumble. Stutt-utt-utters is a gentleman who often does not carry through on his word. I have talked about this in previous watering holes. On January 30 2013 05:11 SuckMyTopdeck wrote: Oh, and I don't make too much of Stutters yet. He kinda seemed interested in the posts that he has made. And he does this not-following up shit all the time in any game. Therefore, what this particular gentleman finds most interesting about this turn of events is the willingness of Mr. D. Ion to join in this endeavour. Verily, he drank and smoked with me in the establishment from which I pull this snippet of discourse from, therefore it is quite curious that he feels Stutt-utt-utters has a high chance of being of evil intent here. Perhaps I was too hasty in casting judgement upon gonzaw. While it remains true, as the esteemed Sir BlazingHand told, that gonzaw only became interested in our discourse after significant pressure, it remains the case that if gonzaw truly holds good intentions, then he had no other course open to him. Perhaps the esteemed Sir BlazingHand remembers an occasion in a different establishment, many moons ago, called "Area 53". In that watering hole, the esteemed Sir was convinced I held bad intentions, and yet when I displayed good intentions, remained convinced I was evil. And yet, at that time, I was of pure intent! Therefore this gentleman will allow the time to peruse whether gonzaw wishes to continue discourse when eyes do not bore into him. ##Unvote: gonzaw Of the gentlemen that hide in the shadows, I find one to be of particular interest, he known as Hassybaby. On February 14 2013 01:00 Hassybaby wrote: Good afternoon gentlemen, I hope you're all well I've been reading everything while at my internship, and this comment caught my eye: Justify this, because that's the last thing that a townie should be worried about imo On February 14 2013 02:09 Hassybaby wrote: Dammit Keir, I wanted him to answer. Oh well... On February 14 2013 02:57 Hassybaby wrote: That's cool. I haven't played with Dandel before and wanted to get his thought process. Felt like an easy way to get it Anywho, it's irrelevant now. For the record, I'm also voting instant majority and...well I'll wait a bit about the other thing. May need your guys' help with something to do with my role Truly, this gentleman can not discern the positive intent with the limited discourse from Hassybaby thus far. The discourse given here is irrelevant, and apparently without aim. Does Hassybaby truly wish to discover the thought process of Mr. D. Ion, or does he merely wish to appear as if it is so? The gentleman has retreated back into the shadows. It is this gentleman's opinion that Hassybaby wishes to appear as a man of good intentions, but is masking his true, darker side. ##Vote: Hassybaby In my leather notebook, I made another note of mention with my elegant quill: On February 14 2013 03:19 Keirathi wrote: Right, I agree that Dandel hasn't done much towards proving his innocence if he does in fact believe that that should be your #1 priority as a townie. But I was only commenting on Hassy's statement, not whether Dandel was "practicing what he preached". jcarlsoniv spoke of the difference of intent and actions of Mr. D. Ion, and yet gentleman Keirathi took it upon himself to give a defence of his own discourse. And yet, jcarlson was making a point about Mr. D. Ion, not Keirathi himself. It is certainly curious that gentleman Keirathi felt the desire to defend his conversation at this point. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 00:34 iamperfection wrote: so stutters has a meta where he doesn't do anything? pretty useful meta if he were scum. i say we force him to contribute or he should die a most horrible death. This gentleman says we lynch people who look as though they have evil intent, we do not close our eyes and urinate in the dark. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote: Marv, you are saying + Show Spoiler + ##Vote: Stutters wrong. Get it right next time :D And yet for reasons that I do not understand, you do not heed my words of wisdom. Why not? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
For example, I am still interested in why Mr. D. Ion imagined it a fine idea to vote for Stut-utt-ers when, as mentioned, he was in the previous establishment where I made Stut-utt-ers' usual behaviour quite apparent. Mr. D. Ion, you seem willing to declare many of evil intent, and yet without rigorous discussion or rationality. Why is this so? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 00:51 iamperfection wrote: referring to dandel in that post ? Mr D. Ion was referring to gentleman Keirathi. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:13 iamperfection wrote: 1 to 10 marv how confident are you in hasbaby Perhaps 7, sir, give or take. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:41 Keirathi wrote: Speaking of which: ##Vote: Oatsmaster This is the second time you've made a bullshit "read" with terrible reasoning. If you were town, you would be voting/giving town reads for real reasons, not something you just made up that sounded good. Also, while I'm on the subject of Oats, a question for Marv: (From the post-game of LVIII) So why is it that when Oats does this same thing (asking irrelevent questions that serve no direction or purpose), you give Oats a town read? Hello, gentleman Keirathi. Simply enough, young Oats and Djodref are not the same gentleman. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Truly it can be argued that young Oats does not make arguments rigorously or perhaps even correctly; yet I have not seen the evil intentions that I have been able to discern before. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:36 austinmcc wrote: Maaaaaaaan, Keirathi beating people to comments again. I was trying to find a post of Hassy's in chaos to get a filter I do remember Hassy being more active there, which isn't hard, but mainly remember him making some comments concerning current thread events that were in line with what I was thinking. Especially D1, there was a lot of spam about how we should vote to swap/lynch that game, and he made a few posts that just felt thought out concerning what he preferred. Here, there's an absence of that entirely. You can summarize his posts in 2 bullet points basically, and one of those is just that he seems to have something concerning his role that he wants to discuss at an unknown time in the future. Given that you were also in the establishment in a different universe, do you agree or disagree with this assessment, sir? Or perhaps you disagree with my own assessment of the gentleman named Hassybaby? Verily, when I see similarities in behaviour between establishments and differences, I prefer to concentrate on the differences, rather than speculating whimsically that a certain gentleman may have changed his discourse. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 02:12 austinmcc wrote: ohai marv. Hassy was an active participant in D1, see above. He felt less active during other day. D1 there also required a bit more planning, as we pretty much had to decide how to play that game on D1, whereas D1 here is just "okay instant majority." If I take the setup posts out, there's still meat there. Questioning foolishness, questioning darkfire, generally keeping track of things. It's absent here. Gotta admit though, I haven't played with hassy much, and don't think I've played with scum hassy. That's one reason I don't want to lynch based purely on differences between Parallel and here...that's not really a sample size of his play that I can trust. I'd rather be able to judge his posts and his decisions. If there isn't anything in that bucket to go off of, I'd be down to lynch him tomorrow I guess, but this is just a blind lynch at this point. My apologies, sir - my conversation was directed at gentleman Keirathi, not your fine self. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 04:58 randombum wrote: Anyways, oats is looking worse in my eyes. Just read his filter, its all pointless questions and argumentative writing, and it's full of random "Let's join this wagon" vote switching. Marv seems to be taking the easy way out and calling out a lurker. Do "vets" normally stay this quiet during day 1 so they don't stand too much for N1, or is he just coasting? The rest of the lurkers are pretty annoying too. Hello, potential friend. I have a question - do you think all lurkers are likely to be town? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:00 Dandel Ion wrote: I have it on good faith that he's just absent. He does that sometimes, this silly willy. That said I'm out for the night. Might miss deadline. I assume then, Mr. D. Ion, that you are happy with your vote to remove Stutters from the establishment, despite his recent willingness to discourse with the rest of us gentleman? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:13 Stutters695 wrote: God damnit, all Marv makes me think.of with all this gentlemen talk is THE GENTLEMEN from How I Met Your Mother. It is my cunning plan, sir, to distract all you fine gentlemen from relevant discourse with thoughts of poorly made 'television' shows. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:16 randombum wrote: No, I'm pretty sure out of all the lurkers there's bound to be at least mafia. Since have the people in the game are lurking. Would you like to re-word that question. I had hoped the implication of my question was clear. Do you think it is a good idea to try to discern who between the quiet ones have evil intent, and which have good intent? Assuming the answer to my question is yes, I would like for you to tell me why doing so is 'taking the easy way out'. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:27 randombum wrote: Your question was basically "is it good to catch mafia among lurkers". Of course the answer is yes, but the way you are going about couldn't really be called strong play. You basically chose one, said that's not like him, and nothing else. Outside of your silly non-nessecary writing style your only contribution to the game was calling out a lurker. Something that anybody could do. For a supposedly great player you have not said anything about anybody else all game. Perhaps you should go over the records of my discourse more thoroughly, as you are incorrect on all counts. The gentleman Keirathi gives me slightly warmer feelings than previously with his question to austin about his case. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:29 iamperfection wrote: Maybe you should try harder then. I'm very easy to read However u think your case makes it more likely that your town since scum no better than to come after me. Except the gentleman named thrawn, or perhaps a gentleman named Hapahauli? I'm curious why you think this, sir. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:32 Keirathi wrote: Well I'll share, because I think he has a very interesting playstyle. Town iamp is quite capable of doing all those things you outlined. He says whatever pops in his head, randomly calls people our, and hardly ever is a major voice in getting someone lynched. He's a follower not a leader, but he does have unique viewpoints and opinions. The major way to tell the difference between scum iamp and town iamp, though, is in his attitude. Town iamp just doesn't give a fuck. He will literally say anything that pops into his head, doesn't care how it makes him look. He doesn't apologize for it, or take things back, or hold his tongue. Scum iamp on the other hand is CAREFUL. Maybe that's not the best word for it, but I think it describes it perfectly. He tries not to make sure he pisses anyone off, he isn't as free and easy with his thoughts, and he's even less aggressive than normal. Personally, I think ATM that he is kind of fitting into his scum persona atm. He just doesn't have that "I don't give a fuck" attitude in most of his posts. Im not sure I want to lynch him yet though, because there are hints of it, and I just want to see more before I come to a definite conclusion. My inclinations are opposite. Interesting. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:35 randombum wrote: Marv, are you REQUIRED to post the way you are. If I were to answer your question, potential friend, I would have to lop your penis off. And I am not inclined to show such cruelty to one so bummy. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
To the gentleman Crossfire - the gentleman known as Hassybaby has not given me pause to reconsider my belief that he has evil intentions. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:44 Stutters695 wrote: To you sir, I pose this question: is Gonzaw not the most unseemly gentleman in this fine establishment? Does sir Hassybaby's poor analysis truly make him more likely to poison our scotch over Mr Gonzaw whose actions this fine day strongly resemble his criminal actions in LIX? (Posting like this is kinda fun lol) A man after my own heart! A finer man I have not laid my eyes on. It indeed remains possible that gonzaw is, as you postulate, unseemly. However, he has shown a certain level of interest and discourse beyond which the bounder named Hassybaby has displayed. Certainly it will become clearer to the gentlemen of this establishment whether gonzaw has good or evil intentions in sessions to come. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 06:50 Crossfire99 wrote: Stutters are you keeping your vote on Mr. CC? I agree that his disappearance is disturbing, but I don't know if we can convince enough people to get him lynched cause it's majority lynch. Guys we really need to start narrowing this down because it is majority lynch. I don't wanna no lynch day 1 cause that's terrible and gives us nothing. This gentleman speaks great wisdom. Please, fellow men of this establishment, heed his fine words. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
austin: please phrase your enquiries in a manner that I can comprehend, it would verily be appreciated by this gentle soul. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:02 austinmcc wrote: I must protest at your assumption that everyone is a "gentleman." Surely some of the folks here aren't. You disagree with keirathi in terms of iamperfection's meta, it seems. But do you agree with some of the points that I raised? Do you find iamperfection to be a scummy scamp or a townie scamp? Gentlemen may have good or evil intentions, so long as they do not curse on alternate Wednesdays. The discourse I dislike from the scamp iamp is his desire to punish Stut-utt-ers, seemingly independent of evidence whether he was good or evil. However, the tone and manner of his discourse leads me to believe his intentions are good. As mentioned, I would share my bourbon with him. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:03 Kurumi wrote: I'm keeping my vote on Sylencia - he is thinking I will risk my life to confirm him as "town", never answered why he felt overwhelemed, actively lurked and still refuses to play. Also, he is the creator of my role and tried to convince me into a situation where I could die >_> Handsome knight, would you be amenable to explaining to your fellow gentlemen precisely what you have alluded to here? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:09 Blazinghand wrote: i guess i'm not saying hassy or stutts lynch is bad per se but at least be aware that it would be a policy lynch >:| I disagree, sir, and if you believe so, you have not been listening to the discourse very well. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:11 austinmcc wrote: Because kurumi makes it sound like sylencia's alignment can be determined based on what he's trying to get Kurumi to do with his role... This is certainly a possibility. And Sylencia is a gentleman of interest - the gentleman kitaman raised good points about the man. At the minimum, I do not understand why some further discourse from Kurumi on the matter would hinder our comprehension. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:15 Blazinghand wrote: I've read the arguments in favor of lynching hassy and I am simply not convinced. yes, he was active in Parallel mafia and weighed on on matters of policy, interacting with brodoosks like foolishness and so on, and this time he's been an inactive ass (filter) but that doesn't make him scum. It makes him an inactive ass. Vig him or pressure him after this lynch, but this is at BEST a meta lynch based entirely on activity level and not mindset, and at worst a policy lynch of a potentially useful player. You're just wrong. This gentleman would contend that he is less likely to be incorrect than you, fine sir. I have, indeed, talked about the discourse from Hassybaby in this particular establishment. It is not merely a matter of recorded discourse in previous establishments. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:20 iamperfection wrote: that is why i thought it was weird marv I'm not quite sure I understand, scamp? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:23 iamperfection wrote: you haven't figured out that i made your role? Apparently I had not, young scamp. And now I understand what you are alluding to. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 07:28 iamperfection wrote: well maybe i expect to much of you but i would have thought you would have figured it out here There are certain facets of play that I do not have great perception of. For example, in previous establishments when I had evil intentions, I was a poor show at what they term "blue-sniping." Perhaps it might amuse you, scamp, that even now you have pointed out this discourse of yours, it is still not immediately obvious to me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
This particular gentleman wonders if you are in fact yamato in disguise. I wonder, in particular, how lynching someone who lurks in the shadows has become in this establishment, and recent establishments, a "policy lynch" or "coinflip". This indicates that gentlemen have a lack of confidence in their ability to read those with few posts. On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote: Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all. I am aware, gentleman Keirathi, that this is not aimed at me. Hassybaby usually has enthusiasm for themed games at least when he has good intentions. I remember a previous establishment (Mad Men) where I confidently declared him of evil intentions, for the reason that he never showed any interest in his fellow gentlemen. Count Cheesecake, to my horror, is performing a similar feat to his shenanigans in the watering hole named 'LVIII', therefore I am not confident that he may have evil intentions; Stut-utt-utters has come across as amiable to discourse of late. The man known as Sylencia I also believe may well have evil intentions. He continuously makes little chitter-chatter with other gentlemen, but only ever about his own person, and never unprompted. This is why looking at such gentlemen is not merely "policy". | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 08:16 Blazinghand wrote: the issue here iamperfection is that many players in this game have found legit cases to make. I don't think the case on hassybaby is a legit meta case (like say my case on oats) because you're not addressing his mindset of his pattern of play as scum. you're just saying "look, he's posting less, he must be scum" and this is not a legitimate way to play. This is a policy lynch in a room filled with scummy players. We should be hunting scum, not policy lynching. Your refusal to actually read my case only further reinforces my suspicions that you are working against the town I have quite clearly pointed out, my esteemed sir, that the little contribution that Hassybaby did make looks like a sham, a farce, a pretence. His apparent enquiry into Mr D Ion's alignment was empty and not followed through. As I have indeed mentioned before, it is the appearance of caring but in a manner that does not demonstrate as such. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:18 iamperfection wrote: guess you will have to go elsewhere why you no care that much about lynch? + Show Spoiler + somewhat offtopic, so. Firstly it should be clear to you how I was planning to approach this game from the chatter at the beginning. Actually I tried way harder than I had planned to try already. In fact my preferred candidate was in the lead for quite some time. I'm not the mayor you're looking for, mostly I wanted to find a really good case to sheep (as in MTG Mafia just finished, where I jumped on gonzaw's case). Unfortunately there wasn't one and Hassy looked like a great lynch. Secondly, and this should be clear to anyone who has read my most recent games, I do in fact have a partner. And it is Valentine's Day. Go figure. I just came home, anyway, from his house. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:21 jcarlsoniv wrote: Note: I'm out for a friend's birthday for the night. I'll read all your bitching and whining about the role I created later. Did you in fact make young Oats' role? Or am I forgetting a detail from elsewhere. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:35 austinmcc wrote: I guess you can interpret that as "Maybe I thought it was possible BH was scum," but I feel like he'd just come out and say so if that were the case, instead of talking about himself in the third person? That was indeed my interpretation, my good sir. For what other reason did he say "you can bitch about the role I created tomorrow." Also On February 14 2013 05:30 jcarlsoniv wrote: Also, I would like to point out that since Blazinhand challenged me and I voted him, and Dandelion picked up the assault on Oats, BH has all but fallen off the face of the planet. I do not understand why gentleman jcarlson would ask the rest of us gentleman to bitch about the role he created if he did not, in fact, create young Oats' role. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:37 Dandel Ion wrote: Huh? It sounds very very much like he did it. Or was there anybody else who actually thought BH was scum? (or at least pretends to) It certainly would give the appearances of being mightily convenient. I would like to hear more discourse from Mr. jcarlson on the matter. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 09:57 iamperfection wrote: i dont particularity care what you want. I know you have a burning desire to always win so either step up and stop the nonsense. i gave you an amazing gift. but it could also be an undoing for this town. either step up or i will gladly kill you myself. Fortunately I do not dance to your tune, scamp. I am not here to please you, nor is wanting my untimely death because of this fact a logical approach. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 10:03 iamperfection wrote: if your not gonna try harder to help me lynch scum than it is very logical. ok dear. fill your boots. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 22:57 Dandel Ion wrote: My point exactly. You post next to nothing, so my pointers I gave towards it describe the post perfectly. Maybe you should rethink your notion that I'd only ask about posts that fit your own little definition of "significance" Perhaps, Mr. D. Ion, you'd like to be more direct with the fellow, rather than performing this little dance? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:05 Dandel Ion wrote: Unfortunately, I need to dance right now. Directness, may be achieved after dancing. But only, only, if the dance is finished. Would you care to waltz with me, perhaps after a glass of port? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:14 jcarlsoniv wrote: I think his posting is a pain in the ass to read, (although I enjoy reading a nice Game of Thrones novel in the middle of a mafia game), but nothing so far has really raised any flags for me. Why, what do YOU think of him? And dandelion, for that matter. Sir, would you perhaps perform a little experiment for me? Take a look at the cad named Sylencia's discourse thus far in this establishment, and let me know what you discover. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:23 iamperfection wrote: i stated before if he doesn't start pushing his agendas strongly he is scum. dandelion has been giving town vibes all game. -says he doesn't care but has been active anyways -cared about the lynch -etc Sadly, scamp, you are mistaken, as amply demonstrated by Keirathi's quotation, and perhaps you would like to examine my discourse in the establishment of 'MTG'. It should have been quite clear that I would not push any "agenda" hard, as this was not my motivation for entering this fine establishment. Indeed, it perplexes me that you continue to think this. This will be, however, the last I make mention of it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:40 iamperfection wrote: because it is bs if you were town the burning desire to catch scum would shine through. Then I'm afraid, scamp, you do not know me like you think you do. Perhaps you'd like to browse MTG, where I openly sheeped Day 1 because I did not have the desire to make a comprehensive case myself. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 15 2013 23:47 Dandel Ion wrote: Perhaps you should stop mentioning it as if it somehow made you town this game cause it sure as hell doesn't. You are right, sir. However, it does not make me of evil intentions, either. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
However, I am confident that I will continue to enjoy my stay in this establishment and partake in discussions, as my discourse all has good intent. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 00:24 iamperfection wrote: i want jcarl to explain this from before this post as i already pointed out if he thought bh was scum why was he trying to kill me. This gentleman is also interested in this particular discourse. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 01:21 austinmcc wrote: marv, pretend kita and sylencia are trains. kita leaves Dover at 150 km/h, staying at that speed. It trains on over to the chunnel, and trains through the chunnel, headed for Lyons. sylencia leaves Lyons at 200 km/h, staying at that speed. It trains on over to the chunnel, through the chunnel, headed for Dover. do they hit each other in france, the chunnel, or england? Slightly north of Paris, I wager. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 02:00 jcarlsoniv wrote: Early in the day, I was leaning scum on BH. Note that I placed my vote on him. As the day went on, these feelings dissipated slightly, enough so that I wasn't going to push the case (nor did I have the time to do so). I switched my vote to iamperfection. It was coming time to consolidate votes (votes were scattered everywhere). At the time, iamperfection was the best candidate in my eyes. Everything looked fine, I left to go across campus to be with my friends. I check the thread on my phone and notice that BH has started a panic switch onto oatsmaster. I have seen panic switches in the past, and often (in my experience) they are led by scum day 1 because town has no clue about anyone. Ok, cool. I made oats' role, so I know that if he's lynched, BH will also go down. Since my previous feeling of BH were not gone, this wasn't the end of the world in my eyes. Had I been actually at my computer when BH snowballed the panic switch, I may have reacted differently. However, I cannot change the RL circumstances. Clearly I was wrong about BH, and for that I apologize. This is some understandable discourse. Stut-utt-utt-ers also provides insight with his comment about the lack of necessity of claiming you created the role. Would you care to play along with my request from earlier, gentleman? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 02:31 jcarlsoniv wrote: LOL wow that filter... Yeah I could see sylencia being scum. Also, what ever happened to cheesecake? Count Cheesecake's absence is worrying. He is also revelling in another establishment too ("Nomination"), and has not made discourse there in 40 hours either. This particular gentleman is unsure what to take from this. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 06:41 austinmcc wrote: It's ridiculous to claim if it weren't true, so we can assume it is. But of course it doesn't mean that he's not actually responsible for anything that happens. Hopefully keeps everything from going wonky if people see him doing stuff though. This is a succinct appraisal of that situation. Thank you austin. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 07:03 Crossfire99 wrote: Marv, does the fact that Hassy is being replaced change your read on him? His eternal absence does soften my inclination to declare him of evil intent. Truly, it reminds me of a previous establishment called 'LVIII' where I believed Adam to have evil intentions, but he had in fact fainted and had to be taken away by the ambulance. I will remain wary of he who replaces Hassybaby; I still find the discourse that the man known as Hassybaby put forth to be somewhat false. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 09:04 Hopeless1der wrote: Kurumi + Show Spoiler + Welcome to Themed game Mafia! You are The Information Gambler! -- Every night, select another player. Both players are informed of their opponent and PM the mod with one of three options: "Share Information", "Pass", or "Kill Opponent". - If both players select the same option, nothing happens. - If one player picks "Share Information" and the other picks "Pass", the player picking "Pass" gets privately informed of the other player's alignment. - If one player picks "Share Information" and the other picks "Kill Opponent", the player picking "Kill Opponent" will kill the other player, but the kill announcement will reveal the killer. - If one player picks "Pass" and the other picks "Kill Opponent", the player picking "Kill Opponent" will kill the other player, but there will be no reveal regarding the killer. You win with the Town! ---Kitaman24 has won Kurumi's wager--- This gentleman finds this particular death remarkably interesting. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 09:15 iamperfection wrote: Wait who did you target Marv Hello scamp, I used my given gift on the gentleman Sylencia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 09:20 iamperfection wrote: Unless he thought krumi was going to kill him..... One should note, scamp, that gentlemen Kurumi and kitaman were both electing to remove the same gentleman from the establishment. I would, however, dearly like to hear from gentleman Kita on this matter. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Sadly not as impactful as I had hoped, scamp. I only had a roleblock to play with. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
It is of paramount importance that the gentleman kita is not elected today. I desire to lead this establishment to great glories, after the shambolics of recent events where my wisdom was not heeded. For the moment, I wish to eject gonzaw from the premises. ##Vote: gonzaw ##Elect: marvellosity | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 16 2013 22:10 Vivax wrote: Can someone link me the day and night posts so I can first read the mechanics before I read the players playing based on those? Certainly, fine gentleman: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397553¤tpage=10#181 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397553¤tpage=49#962 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397553¤tpage=57#1137 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Perhaps the remaining gentlemen in this establishment are concerned at the number of those with good intentions ejected thus far, and would wish to have me help them. At this stage of our discourse I must be frank; the scamp and Mr D Ion merely flail around aimlessly, and we cannot afford for this to be the case any more. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 17 2013 00:19 Dandel Ion wrote: I quite like my wisdom. You seem to like it too. Unless of course, it were concerning you. That you possess the arrogance to even think you may be elected after the play you displayed in this game should make you sad. At least as sad as it makes me. I have a proven record of removing gentlemen of evil intentions from establishments. My intentions have been pure, therefore I am a fine choice. It saddens me that you believe this to be a matter of arrogance, rather than wishing for the triumph of those with good intentions. Sadly, it does not surprise me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 17 2013 00:55 iamperfection wrote: Who is your top town read Marv This is not important for me to reveal currently. Certainly not to one so rabidly against me. I wish to remove gonzaw, and pending further discourse, kita. This is the important information that you need. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
If at a future time it appears somehow I will not be elected, I will be abundantly clear if I believe a gentleman to be a poor candidate. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Naturally the same gentleman, who was perhaps a tenth as bothered with the discourse as I, gives me points of evil for not being bothered. Gentleman Austin was right about this one. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 17 2013 13:52 iamperfection wrote: marvel baby you approve of this sylencia lynch? Hello scamp. I would prefer to eject gonzaw considerably more than Sylencia. In large part because I do not trust kita's intentions. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 01:58 Dandel Ion wrote: Yes a lie was my first instinct indeed. Happened to even me it has before. Poison? More like poisson. + Show Spoiler + Catching up on the thread now, but for some reason I found this hilarious. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Vivax looks terrible as Hassy's replacement. He's done nothing with the reprieve of being a replacement. He's saying I should be lynched on day 2 (?!) because it's lylo, he's also voting for the player who has by far the largest filter, and at this stage is very likely town, whether he has suspicions of me or not. I don't think iamp is mafia. kitaman is looking somewhat better to me today since, in a situation that's fucking dire for town, he's been around and posting much more than I'd expect him to as mafia. Mafia are in a very comfortable position after fucking infinity town deaths through a whole series of bad luck events from what I can see so far. This shooting Kurumi thing. I dunno. To answer dandel, my role is mind-control. Ergo I steal someone else's role. Last cycle I mind-controlled Sylencia (who I thought had a decent chance of being mafia) and used the roleblock that Sylencia had (or 'telekinesis') on Hassybaby/Vivax, who I also thought had a decent chance of being scum. That's where Vivax's roleblock came from. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 02:11 gonzaw wrote: Right now I'm more willing to not save him, he hasn't done the shit I'd expect town iamp to do, and hasn't done shit basically. He's not under pressure (like on D1) so I'd expect more activity and involvement from him, which hasn't happened, so I'll keep the poison on him for now. You expect more activity and involvement? When I was checking some stuff yesterday, iamp had by some margin the 2nd largest filter. What exactly were you expecting, gonzaw? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 04:49 Dandel Ion wrote: That's like the role I made, only without downsides So you have full knowledge of Syl's role or just parts? I have full knowledge. I get to choose which part I want to use. Sylencia has one ability, 'telekinesis'. This roleblocks a target, and roleblocks anyone visiting the target. He has another ability, whereupon he steals someone else's ability to use the next night. For obvious reasons I didn't choose this one (useless to me) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
The msot active people this day 2 have been Dandel and iamp... | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 04:54 Vivax wrote: Dandel's filter is ridiculously empty and full at the same time and you know it marv. Most of it is random, trolly, jokey stuff. I know you can do better than this when you're town marv, but you're not. no, it just means you're a moron. yes dandel's filter is empty. But he's practically in this thread holding conversations by himself. With anyone who's around to listen. Mafia don't just randomly talk to all and sundry for giggles. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 05:11 Dandel Ion wrote: You refuse to answer me, so you're scum. that's all I need to know. Also that is wrong, marv was also completely and utterly useless as town in MTG. But at least he's not bad enough to think I'm mafia, which I can't say of everybody here. Hey. Hey! I had a mafia read from the end of the first cycle to the end of the game! Ok, it was a sheep read, but whatevs. Back a bit later after dinner and such. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
##Unlynch ##lynch: Sylencia | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
my hammer | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
do you want to shorten the day to 24 hours or delay the next lynch flip until the next cycle | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
i have to forward one of those to you, though. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
"er..." "srsly, they're awesome plans, I think you should pick one" "um, i'll go with one that might kill the enemy instead" "well whatever, fu" | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 21:10 Dandel Ion wrote: Oh, don't stumble all over each other in attempts to solve the game. what's to solve for tomorrow? we kill gonzaw because he's mafia and he randomly killed a townie for no reason. Sylencia was kita's only possible redemption, as it is he randomly killed Kurumi and pushed like hell to save gonzaw, the other mafia. The lynches look completely obvious. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 18 2013 21:24 Dandel Ion wrote: The lynches for tomorrow - maybe, but there be two more than just two. maybe, but it's hard to motivate people when there's 2 bankers. Judging from the game so far, it's hard to motivate people even when there aren't 2 bankers :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 19 2013 00:53 Vivax wrote: Dandel, marv, carlson kita. no u | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
game was silly because the Sylencia lynch was a farce; I was looking bad, gonzaw was almost certainly mafia, and kitaman had randomly shot a townie for no reason and it was announced as much by the hosts. hopeless was a boss co-host, GM too, although having PYP so soon after starting with PTP still seems weird to me. Quite apart from the fact I was mafia, nice to see mafia win one of these large-ish themed games for a change. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 20 2013 08:43 gonzaw wrote: Also hey! First scum win in like a century for me! It must mean this was the performance of the century for me! (.......yeah >_> ). Also yeah, you guys should really read our IRC chat from the Syl lynch, it was hilarious. you can blow me later | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
it was a massive stroke of luck that the day 1 lynch killed you. made all the difference. pretty much where the game diverged from a town win to a mafia win, I think. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 20 2013 09:51 Blazinghand wrote: I'm not sure I'd have been able to catch crossfire very easily since he was 1-shot lynchproof. I may have mislynched stutters also since he was playing like turd (though I won't make this mistake in the future, seeing how he played this game). If Oats didn't have the hipster vengeful trait and we went into D2 at 7-4 with me alive instead of 6-4 it still wouldn't have been an easy game for town. no, but for example, you'd have relentlessly pushed gonzaw day 2, and with kitaman outing himself with the daypost, you'd also have made sure he get lynched. You were vet so hard to kill... I can't believe you wouldn't have gotten one of gonzaw or kitaman lynched day 2. | ||
| ||