|
On February 15 2013 08:51 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:49 austinmcc wrote:On February 15 2013 08:45 kitaman27 wrote:On February 15 2013 08:40 austinmcc wrote:
kita, why leave the sylencia/kurumi stuff out of your read? I didn't really come to any conclusions from it, other than the fact that sylencia found it important to respond to a player that was voting for him. Did you get something out of the exchange? I find it odd that you seem focused on sylencia as a scumread, but didn't mention or draw anything from what has been the only sylencia-centric exchange in the thread, imo. Especially given that, if we can trust kurumi, there's some way in which they can check each other, meaning that sylencia may be a bad lynch at this time because we'll be certain/certainish about his alignment later. im going to say this one more time anyone. and i mean anyone. that is going to rely on thier role to prove they are town is an idiot. i dont care what role you have you can only be judged by your contributions.
This is NOT true if sylencia gives kurumi the role "On N1 we each check each other and are guaranteed to know each other's alignments, nothing can mess with this, etc. etc."
I'm not saying that kurumi has a role that can show his alignment. I'm saying that, from what kurumi posted, it APPEARS that the role ITSELF can check both his and sylencia's alignments, depending on what happens.
|
Gonzaw's vote should have taken things to 9. Cycle ends, he's lynched, etc.
|
I DON'T REALLY LIKE THIS VOTE BUT THERE YOU GUYS GO.
I didn't see that keirathi was one of the extra votes despite being on oats already, so I double counted in thinking 9.
|
Any chance you want to share tips from the owner's manual of how to get extra performance out of your thang?
|
Wait, I'm sorry. Did we have someone create a power that kills the first voter, and then not see fit to note what was going to happen here?
|
|
|
On February 15 2013 09:11 iamperfection wrote:what would have changed...............
See all the other posts, or just think about it.
Role creator knew that a lynch on Oats meant a lynch on the first voter. If he thought BH was town, he should have said something so that we knew what was going to happen.
If he didn't think BH was town...he should have said something anyway? I don't remember anyone finding BH scummy, so there was no reason to speak up.
|
AS A SIDE NOTE IN ALL CAPS IT SURE AS HECK DOES MAKE THIS LOOK SUSPICIOUS
On February 15 2013 08:51 Keirathi wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Oatsmaster
Keirathi's vote was ON OATS. He unvoted and revoted oats. He would have been the first voter had he not done that.
|
On February 15 2013 09:13 Dandel Ion wrote:
Everyone claim their role target and the one left over is responsible.
It's easy for me to say that, I already told ya I made randombums, l0l.
IF we are going to do this, we need to have a discussion beforehand.
I don't think we need to all claim right now. I also don't want 2-3 people to read this and claim, which then kind of forces everyone else to fall in line. We should not be doing that before having a discussion on the matter.
|
On February 15 2013 09:14 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 09:12 austinmcc wrote:On February 15 2013 09:11 iamperfection wrote:On February 15 2013 09:10 Kurumi wrote:
ffs you claim those things what would have changed............... See all the other posts, or just think about it. Role creator knew that a lynch on Oats meant a lynch on the first voter. If he thought BH was town, he should have said something so that we knew what was going to happen. If he didn't think BH was town...he should have said something anyway? I don't remember anyone finding BH scummy, so there was no reason to speak up. would it have stoped bh? i dont think so he was in his town tunnel mode but whatever It's not bearing on your alignment that you don't seem to be thinking stuff through, but...come on man
If someone tells you, "Hey, I made the role of the guy you're lynching, and he's going to kill the first voter on him, which is you. You can avoid this if you just unvote and revote:
aren't you going to do it? Scum, town, whatever BH's alignment was, if someone said YOU ARE DOING A THING THAT WILL KILL YOU AND IF YOU TYPE THESE TWO LINES IT WON'T KILL YOU, then you probably type those lines.
Whether he was tunneling or not, town or scum, anything...oat's role's creator didn't need to STOP BH, he just needed BH to unvote/revote, or at the very least to let everyone know "HAI GAIZ SOMEONE GONNA DIE"
|
On February 15 2013 09:16 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 09:13 austinmcc wrote:AS A SIDE NOTE IN ALL CAPS IT SURE AS HECK DOES MAKE THIS LOOK SUSPICIOUS On February 15 2013 08:51 Keirathi wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote: Oatsmaster Keirathi's vote was ON OATS. He unvoted and revoted oats. He would have been the first voter had he not done that. When I unvoted, I was the ONLY vote on Oats, and no one was even seriously talking about lynching him. The bandwagon happened after I unvoted.
I AM WRONG AND KEIRATHI IS CORRECT AND I AM BAD AT READING. KEIRATHI DID NOT UNVOTE AND REVOTE OATS
|
Even if a scum player made the role, that means they were basically willing to trade 1:1 with BH, although it's a little sweeter in that they get information on who made all the roles if we all decide to claim.
|
Role-related
80085
07734
1134
|
Given the post before it marv, I don't think he did.
On February 15 2013 09:14 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 09:11 kitaman27 wrote:On February 15 2013 09:09 Crossfire99 wrote:On February 15 2013 09:08 austinmcc wrote:
Wait, I'm sorry. Did we have someone create a power that kills the first voter, and then not see fit to note what was going to happen here? Brilliant point. His role creator has a lot to explain why he didn't stop this. Well I really gtg so bye. I was thinking the same thing. Wouldn't the role creator bring that up as town if he knew BH was going to get killed too? I think his role creator should claim and if he doesn't claim we assume he is scum. Maybe his role creator thought it was possible that BH was scum. Notice that my first vote was on BH. Also, there was 5 minutes of panic voting, and I'm currently away from my computer. Sorry it fucked us, but don't you fucking blame me for sheeting the fuck out of BH. I was all for iamperfection, but preferred a lynch over a no lynch.
|
I guess you can interpret that as "Maybe I thought it was possible BH was scum," but I feel like he'd just come out and say so if that were the case, instead of talking about himself in the third person?
|
On February 15 2013 09:37 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 09:35 austinmcc wrote:
I guess you can interpret that as "Maybe I thought it was possible BH was scum," but I feel like he'd just come out and say so if that were the case, instead of talking about himself in the third person? That was indeed my interpretation, my good sir. For what other reason did he say "you can bitch about the role I created tomorrow." Also Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 05:30 jcarlsoniv wrote:
Also, I would like to point out that since Blazinhand challenged me and I voted him, and Dandelion picked up the assault on Oats, BH has all but fallen off the face of the planet. I do not understand why gentleman jcarlson would ask the rest of us gentleman to bitch about the role he created if he did not, in fact, create young Oats' role. Yeah, I agree. I just decided it was crazytalk. Perhaps mocsta will replace in and we'll have ACTUAL crazytalk.
|
On February 15 2013 09:54 iamperfection wrote:
also this is so appropriate for bh given his role and his actions in trying to lynch me and oats What does this have to do with ANYTHING?
|
On February 15 2013 09:58 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 09:56 austinmcc wrote:On February 15 2013 09:54 iamperfection wrote:
also this is so appropriate for bh given his role and his actions in trying to lynch me and oats What does this have to do with ANYTHING? that should be self evident austin.
If he was trying to bring balance to the force
And he wanted to lynch you and oats
And oats flipped town...
Moreover, the only effect that his flip has on his wanting to lynch you is that...now we know he was a townie and wanted to lynch you.
|
marv, pretend kita and sylencia are trains.
kita leaves Dover at 150 km/h, staying at that speed. It trains on over to the chunnel, and trains through the chunnel, headed for Lyons.
sylencia leaves Lyons at 200 km/h, staying at that speed. It trains on over to the chunnel, through the chunnel, headed for Dover.
do they hit each other in france, the chunnel, or england?
|
I'm to blame for the weirdness, not my role creator, as far as I know.
Kurumi, can I ask you about this post?On February 15 2013 08:43 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:39 Sylencia wrote:
Kita: I am going to change my vote, there's no point keeping it on you - seeing as how the vote wasn't even a serious one in the first place, I'm just reading through the last 3 pages again to understand where the main frontrunners are getting their votes from. Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 08:40 Sylencia wrote:
In any case, Blazinghand's case on Oatsmaster is more compelling to me that a lot of others, so I'll be sheeping with him on this one.
##unvote
##vote: Oatsmaster ONE MINUTE What the heck..
I didn't pick up on it fully when you first posted this, but was the "What the heck" due to these posts in succession, or due to the "I'm reading through things to see who I want to vote" --> one minute later "BH's case is more compelling than others"
I missed the timestamps, but that's a MIGHTY quick read through the last couple pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
