Themed Game Mafia - Page 4

Post a Reply

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 21:55 GMT

#746

nono. GSL 2. The one you weren't in. THAT D1.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 21:57 GMT

#750

marv, you said you had the opposite leanings of keirathi in terms of iamperfection metadata.

But let's say that all negative numbers are scummy, and all positive numbers are townie. Would the number corresponding to iamperfection be real or imaginary?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 21:58 GMT

#751

EBWOP:

Would the SQUARE ROOT of the number corresponding to iamperfection be real or imaginary?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 22:02 GMT

#754

On February 15 2013 07:00 marvellosity wrote:
randombum, you appear to be a man of integrity. At the very least, I am a fan for the time being of a gentleman who concurs with my thoughts.

austin: please phrase your enquiries in a manner that I can comprehend, it would verily be appreciated by this gentle soul.

I must protest at your assumption that everyone is a "gentleman." Surely some of the folks here aren't.

You disagree with keirathi in terms of iamperfection's meta, it seems. But do you agree with some of the points that I raised? Do you find iamperfection to be a scummy scamp or a townie scamp?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 22:11 GMT

#768

On February 15 2013 07:10 iamperfection wrote:

Show nested quote +

and why do you want to know that?

Because kurumi makes it sound like sylencia's alignment can be determined based on what he's trying to get Kurumi to do with his role...

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 22:12 GMT

#771

Ack. Too much time talking with keirathi, I've caught the jumpiness.

There's only one answer there though.

Back in 15-20.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 22:42 GMT

#794

On February 15 2013 07:36 iamperfection wrote:
this Hassybaby wagon feels comfy by the way,

i encourage everyone to at least try it out.

go read his filter he says nothing of value he is a good lynch.

He says nothing of value. But he also pretty much says nothing at all.

Perhaps he's being especially sneaky in not making excuses, saying he's catching up, throwing in a post here or there, but his being a nonfactor in this game right now points me towards him just not playing.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 22:47 GMT

#798

On February 15 2013 07:45 iamperfection wrote:
he did have that i might need your help for my role guys but there was no follow up.

That's being a non-factor. I might at some unknown time in the future possibly need help from you guys about something I haven't revealed.

It shows that he read his role PM, I guess. But he didn't say what it meant, and IF there is something in there that he wants to discuss with town, he hasn't done so. Again, to me that shows he simply isn't playing atm.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 22:50 GMT

#800

On February 15 2013 07:48 Blazinghand wrote:
guys guys guys read my case on oats

There have been more than just those two games, though. I don't think town oats in CT was as forceful, but I also didn't join until later.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:01 GMT

#818

BH, there's junk in the case. I wanted to go "oh no, that's just two games" (and did), but at least with what you pulled out of CT, it fits.

I'm gonna look his stuff back over, because I hadn't been overly scummy on him this game. But it's worth another look.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:02 GMT

#819

junk in the case = good stuff, it's not just air

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:06 GMT

#831

On February 15 2013 08:03 Sylencia wrote:
austin: you asked if I was here about 6 hours ago, I am now - what did you want to ask?

I wanted to do some back and forth questioning with you, try and get you active in thread for a bit and give us something to work with. For now I'd like to put it aside, because there's other stuff happening and a lynch is coming up.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:16 GMT

#852

BH. I didn't go back and read all his past games, I clicked the stuff you pulled out, and yes, a plot of his attitudes in those town games is inconsistent with the plot of his attitudes in his scum games.

But here...there are a couple things I get hung up on.

On February 13 2013 14:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
You didnt say it outright no, but the way you have been asking questions, is making me think you have a scum read on me.

Why does it matter, if ME as town, has a lousy and innaccurate read on BH? Just ignore it/correct it and move on.

However, if Me as scum, has a unsupported town read on BH, does it make BH scummier? Or townier?

In conclusion, the only reason to be asking me questions like these is if you think I am scum

This is just a funky post. He's responding to Keirathi, who's been poking at him, but hasn't outright called Oats scum. This post, to me, is devoid of scummy intention. He's trying to get this point across, he's trying to draw conclusions or get other people to draw conclusions from his actions, but not in a way that's like...doing much. I'm having a hard time coming up with why scumOats responds here in this way. It doesn't muddy the waters about whether you (BH) are town/scum, it doesn't try to make himself look townie, it doesn't really respond to keirathi's posts specifically, it feels like something that he just posted off the cuff and this was his thought process at the moment.

On February 13 2013 22:22 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nope, I see no reads in your 'first' post Marv.
Help us out here.

Pew pew. Super magical kurumi rule. He couldn't interpret a post that was written in an odd style, but he's trying to do so. Shows he wants to get information from the thread. Not foolproof, but in general I'm inclined to see people who try to make sense of cryptic posts/posters in a townie light --> they're trying to figure things out, which is townie to me.

All his nonsense with me. He kept derailing thread about whether I had a town read on him and DI, assuming I did, questioning me. Yes, it clogged up thread. Yes, it didn't go anywhere useful. But he wasn't creating a big ol' stink and dragging the whole THREAD into it, he was mostly pestering ME. He may have posted a bunch and not pushed things forward at that point, created clutter, but the fact that a lot of it was him chatting with me keeps me from attributing a scummy mindset/purpose to those posts.

I don't want to vote him.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:28 GMT

#868

On February 15 2013 08:26 Keirathi wrote:

Show nested quote +

On February 15 2013 08:15 marvellosity wrote:

On February 15 2013 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:

On February 15 2013 08:01 iamperfection wrote:

On February 15 2013 08:00 Blazinghand wrote:

On February 15 2013 07:59 iamperfection wrote:

On February 15 2013 07:56 Blazinghand wrote:
iamp I want you to seriously sit down with the three oats filters I linked, or at least the quotes I linked, and tell me this is town oats

you won't be able to do that because this isn't town oats

you cant just categorically say that.

Each of those games is a different beast.

CT has so much activity there was a ton of info to go off of ( this game not so much)
The other game was a newbie of course he is going to be more forceful he doesn't have vets or better players to listen to

in this game he has stuck his neck out and isnt trying to blend in he is town in this game.

wow you literally didn't read my case, did you.

you're actually just scum.

##unvote
##vote iamperfection

whatever dude your delusional

tell me why you think im scum

you didn't read my case and you're acting like you read it

also you want a bad policy lynch

This particular gentleman wonders if you are in fact yamato in disguise. I wonder, in particular, how lynching someone who lurks in the shadows has become in this establishment, and recent establishments, a "policy lynch" or "coinflip". This indicates that gentlemen have a lack of confidence in their ability to read those with few posts.

On February 15 2013 08:09 Keirathi wrote:

On February 15 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:

On February 15 2013 08:02 Keirathi wrote:

On February 15 2013 08:00 iamperfection wrote:

On February 15 2013 07:59 Keirathi wrote:

On February 15 2013 07:56 iamperfection wrote:

On February 15 2013 07:55 Blazinghand wrote:
i categorically oppose a lurker policy lynch when there are scummy people to be lynched

but fucking lurking is scummy

So, since scum are the only people that ever lurk, then the scumteam must be Hassy/Sylencia/MrCC/Stutters! Thank you for solving the game! [/sarcasm]

stfu

No. Your entire premise is dumb, because it can be categorically proven than townies lurk from time to time, for whatever reason. Yes, lurking is bad. Yes, lurking hurts town. Yes, it is frustrating to play with people who never post. But no, lurking does not make someone scum. And there are valid reasons to actually think other people ARE scum.

show me where the fuck i said every fucking lurker is scum

Lurking is literally the only reason you've given for wanting to lynch Hassy. So why Hassy, and not CC? Or Sylencia? Or Stutters? If lurking is scummy for one, then it should be scummy for all. Why are you picking him out of the crowd? Context says that if lurking is enough to condemn Hassy as scum, it should be enough to condemn them all.

I am aware, gentleman Keirathi, that this is not aimed at me. Hassybaby usually has enthusiasm for themed games at least when he has good intentions. I remember a previous establishment (Mad Men) where I confidently declared him of evil intentions, for the reason that he never showed any interest in his fellow gentlemen. Count Cheesecake, to my horror, is performing a similar feat to his shenanigans in the watering hole named 'LVIII', therefore I am not confident that he may have evil intentions; Stut-utt-utters has come across as amiable to discourse of late. The man known as Sylencia I also believe may well have evil intentions. He continuously makes little chitter-chatter with other gentlemen, but only ever about his own person, and never unprompted. This is why looking at such gentlemen is not merely "policy".

Forgive me for not jumping to sheep you then, but your weakly reasoned policy-but-not-policy lynch of Kenpachi in Parallel has turned me away from following you down those rabbit holes.

That lynch was butt, but marv wasn't the only reason it went down. Heck, iirc, he wanted to lynch ME at first. He was also 3P. That lynch was also SPECTACULARLY butt.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:30 GMT

#871

That is a bad idea DI.

Right now I'm quite interested in Kita's returning thoughts.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:34 GMT

#875

Mainly because I don't care about the ninjavote, tbh. You yourself noted that he has ninja voted as town.

AMG HERE IS A THING THAT WE PERCEIVE AS SCUMMY BUT ALSO HE HAS DONE THIS AS TOWN. LET'S LYNCH HIM UNLESS HE EXPLAINS.

When just a little while before, you said

I also don't actually wanna lynch stutters. Just wanted to pressure him into posting.

That makes me think that you don't find stutters scummy. You don't want to lynch him, just wanted him to post. Yet, despite not finding him scummy, you want to move BACK to him because of something you know he has done as town? Does not compute.

Like, you say you want to go "back" to him. But if your reasons before were "wanted to pressure him into posting," you SHOULDN'T want to go back, because it's lynch time. We need to lynch SCUM. Not lynch someone to try and get them to post. The same reason you say you voted for him previously no longer applies, so going "back" is silliness.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:36 GMT

#881

On February 15 2013 08:34 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

as town he'd want to push a case or like interact with the thread in a meaningful way

If you're going to push Oats heavily on meta, does the fact that stutters has ninja voted, done so recently, and done so as town (apparently), not have any weight? If not, porqueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:40 GMT

#888

kita, why leave the sylencia/kurumi stuff out of your read?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:49 GMT

#902

On February 15 2013 08:45 kitaman27 wrote:

Show nested quote +

I didn't really come to any conclusions from it, other than the fact that sylencia found it important to respond to a player that was voting for him. Did you get something out of the exchange?

I find it odd that you seem focused on sylencia as a scumread, but didn't mention or draw anything from what has been the only sylencia-centric exchange in the thread, imo.

Especially given that, if we can trust kurumi, there's some way in which they can check each other, meaning that sylencia may be a bad lynch at this time because we'll be certain/certainish about his alignment later.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

February 14 2013 23:51 GMT

#908

On February 15 2013 08:48 Dandel Ion wrote:
So we're 4-4-3-2 right now.

You guys suck at consolidating.

Believe oats is at 5 votes.

It's not looking like crossfire or jcarlson is around right now, which makes moving two of the votes off iamperfection difficult.

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Themed Game Mafia - Page 4

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming