|
On February 14 2013 06:17 Blazinghand wrote:
just to be clear: gonzaw is being profoundly useless acting like scum weird posts doesn't make sense blah blah you get the point
You keep inducing people to make weird comments. Oats before, now DI saying he'd sheep your vote without providing ANY explanation himself or waiting to see what your explanation was.
I thought perhaps he had a voting restriction and couldn't be the first voter on someone, but he started off voting Crossfire99, so he seems able to drop the first vote.
|
On February 14 2013 06:38 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 06:20 austinmcc wrote:On February 14 2013 06:17 Blazinghand wrote:
just to be clear: gonzaw is being profoundly useless acting like scum weird posts doesn't make sense blah blah you get the point You keep inducing people to make weird comments. Oats before, now DI saying he'd sheep your vote without providing ANY explanation himself or waiting to see what your explanation was. I thought perhaps he had a voting restriction and couldn't be the first voter on someone, but he started off voting Crossfire99, so he seems able to drop the first vote. zzz, I called gonzo out for the exact same stuff 6 hours ago already. This is true. I did (fibo)nac(ci) remember that when looking at your sheep comment.
|
(Read that as "not," I had to stretch for it)
|
On February 14 2013 06:47 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 06:45 austinmcc wrote:
(Read that as "not," I had to stretch for it) That was terrible. Does not count.
Have I been mistaken about my point of origin?
|
On February 14 2013 06:47 Crossfire99 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 06:45 austinmcc wrote:
(Read that as "not," I had to stretch for it) Seriously, what's your deal man? Is this some sort of post restriction or something?
It should be plane to the reader that my word choice has been coordinate(d) with some kind of goal.
|
On February 14 2013 07:33 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 06:52 austinmcc wrote:On February 14 2013 06:47 Crossfire99 wrote:On February 14 2013 06:45 austinmcc wrote:
(Read that as "not," I had to stretch for it) Seriously, what's your deal man? Is this some sort of post restriction or something? It should be plane to the reader that my word choice has been coordinate(d) with some kind of goal. And what goal is that? Johnny up and say what you mean. No can do. The set of actions available to me does not include that as a member.
It's nothing spectacular, and this bit isn't useful to any alignment. You could consider my odd posts a constant in the equation that equals a town win, where c=0.
|
(Technically it would be a non-zero c, with some small value that assisted in having the equation come out as a town win).
|
On February 14 2013 08:39 gonzaw wrote:
Yo austin, do you have any reads? Atm my strongest reads are positive. There are a couple people I want to check back over, because I only have a vague idea of what they've done this game, but nobody is leaping out to me as scummy.
|
On February 14 2013 11:51 randombum wrote:
Also what's omgus? By context I can tell its calling out the person who called you out. But what does the acronym stand for.
Oh my God, you/you're suck/scum, I believe
|
Maaaaaaaan, Keirathi beating people to comments again. I was trying to find a post of Hassy's in chaos to get a filter 
I do remember Hassy being more active there, which isn't hard, but mainly remember him making some comments concerning current thread events that were in line with what I was thinking. Especially D1, there was a lot of spam about how we should vote to swap/lynch that game, and he made a few posts that just felt thought out concerning what he preferred.
Here, there's an absence of that entirely. You can summarize his posts in 2 bullet points basically, and one of those is just that he seems to have something concerning his role that he wants to discuss at an unknown time in the future.
|
Sylencia, are you around?
|
On February 15 2013 01:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
Oh really keirathi? Guess I must of thought that with his huge picture and generally mod confirmed town after day 1, that he was more active.
Its still a problem. As austin has pointed out.
? When was he modconfirmed town that game?
|
I don't love saying Hassy was more active "by a large margin," but for reference: Hassy's filter from the world he started out in in Parallel mafia
At least within his D1, he's actively reading both threads. He discusses the general plan of who to swap where. He asks Foolishness, who was in the other thread, some questions concerning Foolishness's posts. When Darkfire posts his weird claim, Hassy questions Darkfire. When Dieno is being lynched (and after lynch), he's trying to draw conclusions from what was happening.
A lot of his activity was on that first day, and it somewhat tailed off afterwards. I would like to see hassy more active, but I don't currently want to vote him as #1.
|
ohai marv.
Hassy was an active participant in D1, see above. He felt less active during other day. D1 there also required a bit more planning, as we pretty much had to decide how to play that game on D1, whereas D1 here is just "okay instant majority."
If I take the setup posts out, there's still meat there. Questioning foolishness, questioning darkfire, generally keeping track of things. It's absent here. Gotta admit though, I haven't played with hassy much, and don't think I've played with scum hassy. That's one reason I don't want to lynch based purely on differences between Parallel and here...that's not really a sample size of his play that I can trust.
I'd rather be able to judge his posts and his decisions. If there isn't anything in that bucket to go off of, I'd be down to lynch him tomorrow I guess, but this is just a blind lynch at this point.
|
On February 15 2013 02:09 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2013 02:07 austinmcc wrote:I don't love saying Hassy was more active "by a large margin," but for reference: Hassy's filter from the world he started out in in Parallel mafiaAt least within his D1, he's actively reading both threads. He discusses the general plan of who to swap where. He asks Foolishness, who was in the other thread, some questions concerning Foolishness's posts. When Darkfire posts his weird claim, Hassy questions Darkfire. When Dieno is being lynched (and after lynch), he's trying to draw conclusions from what was happening. A lot of his activity was on that first day, and it somewhat tailed off afterwards. I would like to see hassy more active, but I don't currently want to vote him as #1. then who do you want to kill the most?
I started a post saying gonzaw, but I don't think that's my choice. Pretty sure I'm overvaluing LIX in being willing to lynch him, because there I didn't put enough stock in his activity. Here, he was momentarily Gonzaw after being called out, and then went back to being nothing. That's the same pattern that I didn't value enough in LIX, but the circumstances are also different in that he had a red check there and no red check here.
What I would really like is for Sylencia or Cheesecake to show up and be able to chat with them for like 20 minutes.
|
EBWOP: Started a post a while back, after looking more closely at Hassy.
|
Keirathi, take a look at randombum if you would, and let me know when you've looked. I'd like to discuss him, but I've been less active here so I'll give my thoughts first and see where you're at.
|
Blech, I'll go reread him in parallel. Have no real memory of him there, tbh.
When I read over people that are on the periphery of this game, he sticks out to me.
I actually agreed with Gonzaw's statement that randombum's posts were "neutral." This bit of his post on Oats/BH - If you read Oats statement from the point of view where its already decided by town to pick instant majority, (which I think this town has.) then his reasoning makes sense is pretty much the most unique thing I've seen out of his posts. Granted, I liked the thought, but the rest is mush.
He has scumreads on oats and gonzaw, his only real reads given, but this is at a time where oats has already been called out and gonzaw has as well. To some extent, he admits as much, noting that others have pointed out his Oats issues. At the end of his filter he's on stutters, who everyone has the same thoughts about because there aren't any other thoughts to be had.
It just reads like empty space except for the one line about oats's thoughts and one response to some gonzaw pressure. But even the gonzaw defense is like..."i didn't call you scum, just said you weren't contributing" and things like that. It's his biggest post, but yet doesn't say anything, and reinforces the mush because in some cases he's actively defending himself against gonzaw by saying "No, I said something much more bland than the interpretation you're taking."
I will go check parallel.
|
BONUS PARANOIA NOTE: kitaman's posts were awesome and I liked them and he was the bestest.
Then once the early stuff was over he poofed away, and chimed in to talk about how/why he voted sylencia and about stutters lurking. I get a BIG disconnect between his entrance and the rest of his play this day, and it worries me. He's also in the "do not want to lynch right now" area for me, but I would really like it if the insightful and well-thought-out posts weren't all concerning early stuff and setup, and some of them applied to actual reads or pushed discussion forward during the times we've been stalled.
We've all sucked at pushing thing forward during the stall
|
On February 15 2013 02:46 kitaman27 wrote:
Don't worry austin, I'm still the bestest.
The toughest part for me is that I have no access to TL during the 9 hours of the day at work, so I'm limited to posting at certain times of the day and last night things were really slow. I have about 20 minutes left on my lunch break so hopefully I'll be able to decide by then. Just a thought that had been in the back of my head and was worth vocalizing.
Also, wtb work that blocks access to TL
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
