i didn't post a defense of myself. I thought you are more intelligent than that. I explained my motivations and I shared my findings. I told you that my defense of thrawn was fake.

So you think that a lurking player would start posting cause you write he's just afk? If anything, that's an incentive for more lurking.
How is that even a defence. Both lurking townies and scum can be either lurking or afk.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 21:23 GMT

#680

How the hell did I end up discussing this. Thrawn's getting lynched anyway and I suggested EZ as vig target, so even if I keep arguing with him it will still be the decision of an eventual vig.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 21:26 GMT

#685

EZ, how many games did you play so far?
No insult intended.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 21:46 GMT

#689

Btw Prom, you asked me about Italians. Since EZ is sucking his thumb in a corner we can talk about that.

I can give you a few reliable stereotypes:
Most Italians are loud, drink a lot of coffee and are pretty bad drivers for western european standards, they're obsessed with soccer but you should know that.
There are many thieves. Every house has windows protected with metal bars.

If you know the right people around here you can skip rows at public offices and such, jobs in such positions are given to recommended persons rather than the most fitting ones. That's why politics and bureaucracy are corrupt. It's usual in many countries, but very accentuated here.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 22:01 GMT

#704

Hey Sharrant, I like your latest contributions, they are very detailed.
Don't mind my vote, it's not serious. As for your question: I think it has been answered indirectly by now.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 22:02 GMT

#705

As in: I already talked about the matter in a way that it should have answered it.

Thb I didn't even read your filter again before answering to ghost, so it might come off as strange that I wanted to lynch you there.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 22:06 GMT

#709

Meh. Isn't such a big deal imo.

##Unvote
##Vote thrawn

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 22:12 GMT

#711

On January 28 2013 07:06 Promethelax wrote:
Sorry, go back a second, what contributions do you find detailed Viv? I don't see anything from Shar which I would call detailed.

Sorry, I don't see the point in discussing that unless you think he's scum. But then it should be up to you to argue for that to be the case.
Looks like a pretty experienced smurf of someone, and keeping up that way of writing and arguing well at the same time won't probably be easy for him if he's scum.

Other than that, it's my gut.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:03 GMT

#746

Wow, that was..easy.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:04 GMT

#749

So, Prom, what do we make of JX and Zola?

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:07 GMT

#753

JX: You can't blame me for misunderstanding your stance when I read this. Who were you replying to then? It wasn't my fault that you didn't quot the person you were replying

Don't you think he looks a little scared?Almost feels...guilty.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:31 GMT

#769

I would be slow with making connections now.
We have to ask ourselves: Was there resistance from scum to lynch thrawn or was it a neat bus and scum tried to fully avoid interactions with him?

Can't jump at people just cause they had doubts about a thrawn lynch. The whole lynch seemed to be justified with meta and it was more or less a lurker lynch, so it's natural to not be sure about thrawn as townie.

Look for people who looked immediately sure that he was scum after a certain amount decided to lynch him. I think that would be a good tell.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:33 GMT

#771

On January 28 2013 08:26 xsksc wrote:

Show nested quote +

wut? you'd rather lynch for information over someone you think is UNMISTAKABLY SCUM?

xsksc, explain how the heck he should have known that thrawn was "unmistakably" scum.
Maybe he was for you.

Remember when you agreed on lynching him after claiming that you read someone else as scum? *wink wink*

Remember that, Prom? That's when you voted for xsksc.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:34 GMT

#772

Oh, and you said something along the lines of :

"Sure, I'm fine with lynching lurkers".

Now you say UNMISTAKABLY SCUM?

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:36 GMT

#774

Djo, stop panicking. Give me some feedback about what I just wrote please.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 27 2013 23:56 GMT

#785

xsksc
Don't get irritated, there's no reason to start a shitfest. Just point out the mistake and keep a cool head instead of snarling.
Or keep a stiff upper lip, as you use to say.
Allow me to sum up most, if not all your D1 behaviour regarding thrawn until the vote for everyone to see.

On January 26 2013 12:10 xsksc wrote:

#2 Thrawn has done nothing useful. One comment about something he didn't like and a joke. That's it, pretty suspicious stuff and I hope he starts posting some more substance when he's on next.

On January 27 2013 09:51 xsksc wrote:
EmileZola switches his vote from thrawn to Hapa with no explanation, and thrawn still hasn't posted by then. So the only event that could change his mind would have to have come from Hapa, right?

On January 27 2013 11:18 xsksc wrote:
yeah. nothing that i haven't already raised in the thread though.
-Vivax/hapa looking townie to me.
-thrawn/ghost hardlurking.
-emilezola scum.

On January 27 2013 11:21 iamperfection wrote:
want to join us in killing thrawn xcxczxcz?

On January 27 2013 11:23 xsksc wrote:
Yes, unacceptable lurking is unacceptable. He better get in here soon. D:

On January 27 2013 12:08 xsksc wrote:

I am willing to kill thrawn because of his extreme lurking. Are you saying if thrawn came in here and started making quality posts and glowed townie, I wouldn't re-evaluate the situation because my "mind is made up"? That seems a very silly assumption to me.

On January 27 2013 12:46 xsksc wrote:

Show nested quote +

He didn't even play day one in that game? Why is that game relevant to this situation?
And hey, if you're going to ask me all these questions, I'd appreciate it if you'd do me the simple courtesy of replying to what I have to say.

On January 27 2013 13:05 xsksc wrote:
My bad - I thought he replaced INTO that game, not out of.

Show nested quote +

"Now you're just misrepresenting. My vote is still on EZ, I think he is scum. Nothing has changed there. Where do I say I would rather lynch him over EZ?

"Are you saying if thrawn came in here and started making quality posts and glowed townie, I wouldn't re-evaluate the situation because my "mind is made up"?"
This?

I love how djodref came in and did the same thing as me (staying on his main read but has agreed to kill thrawn) but he's not getting shit for it.

On January 28 2013 04:28 xsksc wrote:
Just woke up and caught up, looks like nobody has any intention of killing EZ today.
##unvote
##vote thrawn2112

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 28 2013 00:14 GMT

#788

I don't, either. If you bussed thrawn you did in a good way.

But I suppose you want to lynch Djo now?

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 28 2013 13:17 GMT

#907

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DJO YOU CANT SHOOT VE THINK OF THE CHILDREN

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 28 2013 13:24 GMT

#908

He hesitated in voting thrawn, remember, and then finally did after I badgered him about his noncommittal stance. That's exactly why I moved my vote to thrawn, because mafia wouldn't fake resist his lynch and then vote for him, they would either bus him or they wouldn't.

This from yamato about VE.

Just saying that it doesn't mean anything about VE. In Hero VE opposed the Adam scumbuddy D1 lynch initially and then voted for him reluctantly.

Djo, talk to me. Put the gun down, it's going to be alright. You're not crazy. You're NOT crazy.

Vivax

22089 Posts

January 28 2013 13:39 GMT

#909

Seriously though, you better shoot ghost. I don't even know why you would claim as either alignment at this point, there was enough time between now and the next lynch deadline to prove you're innocent.