EPTYou can't just call someone 90-95% town (or 95% confident he's town) out of nowhere and not expect us to think he's one of your "strongest" reads, at least based on "weak" reasoning.
TL Mafia LIX - Page 67
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
You can't just call someone 90-95% town (or 95% confident he's town) out of nowhere and not expect us to think he's one of your "strongest" reads, at least based on "weak" reasoning. | ||
|
DearestSnot
Germany200 Posts
They are all incredibly strong reads for me. No point in me naming them now, but I brought up Oats because he's under a lot of scrutiny. Certainly I could be wrong, but there are much much better targets. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
What do you think of his actual "case" against me? Without taking into account WIFOM as "he wouldn't go against a strong mayor candidate!" and the like | ||
|
DearestSnot
Germany200 Posts
It's enough to say that lynching Oats is very suboptimal in comparison to annul or debears or BKE, and that's quite honestly the only thing that's relevant to what needs to happen. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
But well, guess there's no point in beating this bush if we'll be arguing all night about it. I'm not that confident in lynching BKE just yet. It sucks that he completely missed D1, but we need to give him a chance to do something. It's kind of bad how he hasn't tried to use this N1 to make up for lost time on D1 though, I don't even remember him posting. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On January 22 2013 14:42 yamato77 wrote: I think Annul, especially, deserves a hard inspection tomorrow as his encouragement of my suspicions on Vivax and Toad could certainly be seen as fanning the flames, and he never really substantiated his read on Vivax in particular despite insisting that he be lynched. you realize i attacked vivax first right lol in fact i have your filter up and the first vivax attack you make is like 12 hours after i make mine. if anything, you deserve inspection for blatant lies to the game | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
1. why? 2. what made you stop thinking its vivax? | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
also, mafias get "some number" of masons in addition to any other roles they have. his mason post means absolutely nothing. also, we have absolutely no way to confirm that those are real logs, or that they haven't been doctored in any way, etc. its funny cuz toad uses his mason as "town cred" and he is sheriff which cannot be DT'd... and mafia can mason day 1 all the same... | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
You are not. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On January 23 2013 06:02 annul wrote: I don't know that I've ever played against scumtoad, tbh.i also think its funny how toad is SHERIFF (aka cant be DT'd) and he and vivax i suspected the most. now toad wants me dead too. hmmmm. also, mafias get "some number" of masons in addition to any other roles they have. his mason post means absolutely nothing. also, we have absolutely no way to confirm that those are real logs, or that they haven't been doctored in any way, etc. its funny cuz toad uses his mason as "town cred" and he is sheriff which cannot be DT'd... and mafia can mason day 1 all the same... Do you believe scumtoad would start swinging more votes towards him by half-claiming mason like this: On January 22 2013 05:45 Toadesstern wrote: When the logic is kind of crappy given that there are mafia masons? Serious question. I don't actually have a great handle on what his reputation is, exactly, as scum.what if I post something that makes me almost certainly town for everyone and also a damn good candidate for being sheriff. Should I do that and would people be voting me if I did it? Secret paranoia spoiler:+ Show Spoiler + This post is almost funny given DearestSnot's identity: On January 20 2013 13:33 Toadesstern wrote: But also makes me paranoid worried that, in the case that one of those two DOES flip mafia, the other may be as well. Assuming that when smurfing, one reveals himself to his mafia teammates if he rolls mafia, which may or may not be the norm.I think grush should under no circumstance get ANYWHERE close to a position of power. I'd rather vote WBG to be mayor than you. Luckily he's not in the game. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
What do you hope to accomplish with those type of posts? Honestly it's completely mafia motivated to do what you just did at this time. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
I want to hear this one. Please, go on. | ||
|
DearestSnot
Germany200 Posts
so annul, what exactly makes Vivax scum? You claimed to have good arguments for him being scum, but honestly I just see you whining over and over about how no one is listening to you. You clearly weren't even aware of why FT was being voted, nor did you say anything at all about prpl. You wasted your mayor vote, and you basically did fuck all day 1. Why the fuck should anyone care about what you have to say, when quite frankly, it's all garbage? | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On January 23 2013 06:13 austinmcc wrote: Do you believe scumtoad would start swinging more votes towards him by half-claiming mason like this:When the logic is kind of crappy given that there are mafia masons? Serious question. I don't actually have a great handle on what his reputation is, exactly, as scum. its wifom to decide "what scum___ would do" and besides, i do not use metagame analyses whatsoever in my reads. however, if i, personally, were a mafia mason, i would love to be sheriff, because this is a massive hit to the town if so. however, if i were mafia at all, i would have an infinitely better play. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On January 23 2013 06:33 annul wrote: its wifom to decide "what scum___ would do" and besides, i do not use metagame analyses whatsoever in my reads. however, if i, personally, were a mafia mason, i would love to be sheriff, because this is a massive hit to the town if so. however, if i were mafia at all, i would have an infinitely better play. Calls something WIFOM. Posts more WIFOM with a cherry on top. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On January 23 2013 06:31 yamato77 wrote: Oh, so I'm mafia? I want to hear this one. Please, go on. TYL there is a difference between attacking someone and flat-out calling them red. but yes, i AM attacking you. and you have already "heard this one" -- read my posts. it's pretty simple to do. | ||
|
DearestSnot
Germany200 Posts
On January 23 2013 06:33 annul wrote: its wifom to decide "what scum___ would do" and besides, i do not use metagame analyses whatsoever in my reads. however, if i, personally, were a mafia mason, i would love to be sheriff, because this is a massive hit to the town if so. however, if i were mafia at all, i would have an infinitely better play. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/b2i56iR.jpg) | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On January 23 2013 06:34 yamato77 wrote: Calls something WIFOM. Posts more WIFOM with a cherry on top. you have serious reading comprehension problems "what scum___ would do" vs "what I, PERSONALLY, would do" are not the same thing | ||
| ||
