|
On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb.
There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town.
On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it.
It is, and it's this attitude that might stop mafia from conceding. Anyway, here's my notes I drew up:
10-1
FiveTouch
Toad
Vivax
austin
debears
annul
mkfuba
adam
grush
oats
stutters
8-1, 7-1 - Toad confirms someone not mafia (say Stutters)
FiveTouch
Toad
debears
austin
stutters
adam
grush
oats
6-1, 5-1
FiveTouch
Toad
austin
stutters
Oats
grush
4-1, 3-1
FiveTouch
Toad
Stutters
Oats
Lynch for the win. Note, if mafia hold their shot so Stutters (or whoever Toad jails) isn't confirmed, there's 2 lynches at the end and not just 1.
In case Vivax is mafia:
10-1
FiveTouch
Toad
Vivax
austin
debears
annul
mkfuba
adam
grush
oats
stutters
8-1, 7-1 - Vivax confirms Stutters
FiveTouch
Toad
Vivax
austin
stutters
adam
grush
oats
6-1, 5-1 - Vivax confirms grush
FiveTouch
Toad
Vivax
stutters
grush
Oats
Lynch Vivax + Oats next 2 days, game over.
|
On February 01 2013 22:58 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 22:53 Adam4167 wrote:On February 01 2013 21:53 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 20:54 Adam4167 wrote:On February 01 2013 20:19 Toadesstern wrote:
probably adam but I'd like to hear some more from you guys so I'll shut it for now. So you think my master plan was to join the game, draw attention to my well-hidden and Godfather teammate with my first reads post, and then do it again when asked about bugs reads? Yeah, that's really not how I play scum, If i think my team is onto a good thing, id be keeping my mouth shut. I'm not actually sure I want to lynch you at all today, actually. But this post doesn't make sense. Toad & I were 100% lynching Axle if he wasn't medic, and it wouldn't matter if you made the best case ever on him or didn't mention him at all. At the time when I joined the game, you guys were saying he was <1% mafia. My point was, if I was his teammate, why would I shit that up when hes clearly drawing absolutely zero attention? You hadn't figured out that he wasn't the medic yet, so why would I go directing heat onto him there? I have literally no idea who I want to lynch today - But if I don't see tomorrow, make Vivax role check someone who HASN'T already bloody roleclaimed, I still don't trust him. that post actually does make some sense. As adam said, he had no knowledge of our thoughts about axle. Still I don't think telling us you think he's mafia when he's a townish (at that point in time) looking guy is that bad of a play. Either makes you look good or him look better while it's not going to have influence on what's going to happen at all. Anyways, we have 3 mafias pooled on gonzaw and I said I think clarity is town but there's no way we don't lynch you given the situation. The only downside is chez last minute vote which makes no sense with the knowledge that clarity was afk...
Yeah, understandable. If it carries any weight at all, I only use bussing as a last resort. Go read some of my previous scum games, they're not a great read, but I rarely-if-ever even interact with my teammates until they're pretty terminal.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On February 01 2013 22:59 mkfuba07 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb. There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town. Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it.
What does this even mean?
|
|
|
On February 01 2013 23:12 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 22:59 mkfuba07 wrote:On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb. There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town. On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it. What does this even mean?
probably "there might be a 3rd GF"
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On February 01 2013 23:14 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 23:12 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:59 mkfuba07 wrote:On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb. There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town. On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it. What does this even mean? probably "there might be a 3rd GF"
If there is a 3rd godfather I'm never playing in a BC game again
|
On February 01 2013 23:13 mkfuba07 wrote:
It means austin is scum.
There's a check on me and even if the remaining mafia is a framer he can't frame himself.
So either I'm town
or
I'm scum and Vivax is just lying that he checked me last night. Also, in this scenario, Vivax has to be town. So he's a townie just lying about his check for no reason.
That is what you are saying.
|
Oh yeah, I guess 3rd GF is also a possibility.
|
On February 01 2013 23:16 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 23:14 Toadesstern wrote:On February 01 2013 23:12 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:59 mkfuba07 wrote:On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb. There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town. On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it. What does this even mean? probably "there might be a 3rd GF" If there is a 3rd godfather I'm never playing in a BC game again
well I'd say a 3rd godfather is more likely than stutters and grush being mafia to be honest 
|
On February 01 2013 23:16 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 23:14 Toadesstern wrote:On February 01 2013 23:12 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:59 mkfuba07 wrote:On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb. There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town. On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it. What does this even mean? probably "there might be a 3rd GF" If there is a 3rd godfather I'm never playing in a BC game again
Then I am of the belief that you will never be playing in a BC game again.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On February 01 2013 23:17 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 23:16 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 23:14 Toadesstern wrote:On February 01 2013 23:12 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:59 mkfuba07 wrote:On February 01 2013 22:35 FiveTouch wrote:On February 01 2013 22:31 Vivax wrote:
Oats could have elected gonzaw.
Annul or some afk guy (clarity) didn't manage to pull that through.
I'm in for annul, not so much for Oats yet. The question is, who would be killing off masons instead of a cop who keeps confirming towns for us? That's really dumb. The remaining mafia is really dumb. There's no need to kill the cop when he can only make you confirmed town. On February 01 2013 22:56 austinmcc wrote:
I agree with leaving Vivax up until later, and playing the safer game there.
But the "confirmed townie" list isn't as large as you're making it. What does this even mean? probably "there might be a 3rd GF" If there is a 3rd godfather I'm never playing in a BC game again well I'd say a 3rd godfather is more likely than stutters and grush being mafia to be honest
Toad, I think we should kill Oats and fuba.
Us being protected is irrelevant now. I think these 2 have the best chance to flip mafia.
|
On February 01 2013 23:16 austinmcc wrote:There's a check on me and even if the remaining mafia is a framer he can't frame himself. So either I'm town or I'm scum and Vivax is just lying that he checked me last night. Also, in this scenario, Vivax has to be town. So he's a townie just lying about his check for no reason.That is what you are saying.
Don't make it sound like that never happened before. May I remind you of BC's Arkham City in which someone fakeclaimed DT as a townie and then fakeclaimed a redcheck on a modconfirmed (literally (!) modconfirmed) blue guy d2?
Schworz, never forget
Anyways I'm off for a while, see you
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Happy birthday austin!
(i'm clever enough to only say it today due to forum being on KST time. Like a fucking boss)
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
##Vote: mkfuba07
##Vote: Oatsmaster
I kinda agree with Adam's self-analysis tbh. He's not posting like he normally does as mafia, even if he did break promises to come back and contribute.
|
On February 01 2013 23:19 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 23:16 austinmcc wrote:On February 01 2013 23:13 mkfuba07 wrote:
It means austin is scum. There's a check on me and even if the remaining mafia is a framer he can't frame himself. So either I'm town or I'm scum and Vivax is just lying that he checked me last night. Also, in this scenario, Vivax has to be town. So he's a townie just lying about his check for no reason.That is what you are saying. Don't make it sound like that never happened before. May I remind you of BC's Arkham City in which someone fakeclaimed DT as a townie and then fakeclaimed a redcheck on a modconfirmed (literally (!) modconfirmed) blue guy d2? Schworz, never forget Anyways I'm off for a while, see you
Dont mention that game.... still sour.
|
But not clever enough to not fail at hydra'ing. Suspicious.
|
screw you I want my pretty ass protected
|
On February 01 2013 23:19 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 23:16 austinmcc wrote:On February 01 2013 23:13 mkfuba07 wrote:
It means austin is scum. There's a check on me and even if the remaining mafia is a framer he can't frame himself. So either I'm town or I'm scum and Vivax is just lying that he checked me last night. Also, in this scenario, Vivax has to be town. So he's a townie just lying about his check for no reason.That is what you are saying. Don't make it sound like that never happened before. May I remind you of BC's Arkham City in which someone fakeclaimed DT as a townie and then fakeclaimed a redcheck on a modconfirmed (literally (!) modconfirmed) blue guy d2? Schworz, never forget Anyways I'm off for a while, see you I'm trying to make it sound as ridiculous as it is.
I wasn't around for that game, and it's so long that it is one of the ones I never reread. Yes, it's a possible thing, but the bolded sentence is actually what would have to be happening if there's no third GF.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On February 01 2013 23:21 Toadesstern wrote:
screw you I want my pretty ass protected
You'll still be protected. We need to lynch guys we think are mafia.
In addition, they'll kill me before you because I have the extra votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
