On January 16 2013 07:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
yes your answer matters, because i'm having a hard time believing you think i might not want to lynch you

Lol, how does me not thinking you are willing to lynch me make scum? You are so blinded that you don't realize the amount of WIFOM you are using. Open your eyes and start rereading everything I said and try to imagine me being town. If you cannot see a town motivation for what I am doing, then by all means push me. But right now you are just using everything I am saying against me even though it isn't even alignment indicative.

But yes, I think you have a scum read on me but I am not sure if I am your highest scum read.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 15 2013 22:35 GMT

#929

On January 16 2013 07:33 thrawn2112 wrote:

Show nested quote +

I think if you were town, it should be obvious

How would me being scum making it less obvious? You see even here you are WIFOMing.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 15 2013 22:40 GMT

#931

On January 16 2013 07:39 supersoft wrote:
lol lazer, your problem is, you have no explanation for anything you do, your only defense is, that you call our stuff omgus and wifom :-P

I disagree.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 15 2013 22:47 GMT

#935

I'm off to bed. I'm not going to get killed tonight so it doesn't really matter that I am not here at deadline. Night, Night!

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 11:17 GMT

#992

I'm wary of lynching Hopeless. I think his play this game is VERY similar to his play last game. I tunneled the shit out of him that game for stuff that are very much alike to this game. He didn't really push scum reads, he seemed very uninterested in the D1 lynch(both canidates were town), etc. Needless to say, he was town. I'm not actually very confident in lynching Hopeless.

Filter: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=373946&user=123725

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 20:17 GMT

#1056

Bugs, how do you go from:

On January 17 2013 01:42 wherebugsgo wrote:
alright, let's go for it. I actually like Hopeless's thoughts in his last post and Lazer looks much better because he pointed out something that I noticed too; in Hopeless's last game he played somewhat similar to this.

slOosh, on the other hand, is still scum.

##unvote
##vote slOosh

On January 17 2013 04:18 wherebugsgo wrote:
alright.

I'm feeling lazy so let's just kill Hopeless. I don't think anything is going to happen in the near future to make either read stronger and so it's just best to consolidate our votes rather than continue to inflate the thread with further pointless back-and-forths.

##unvote
##vote Hopeless1der

In just a couple of hours? And Hopeless didn't even say a thing during this time. Just you talking with Hapa and him calling the thread bad for not wanting to lynch Hopeless.

@Hapa: did you read hopeless filter from LVIII?

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 20:30 GMT

#1063

On January 17 2013 05:26 jaybrundage wrote:
@LM what's your scum read for today. You haven't posted much on reads latly as you have been defending your self.

Do you still have me as a scum read. Also between Sloosh or WBG who do you think is scum.

Your still slight scummy to me but not lynch worthy I feel. Your posting has improved quite a bit as well so I'm cool with that for now.

I'm trying to determine who I want to vote out of WBG or SlOosh as I'm quite confident one of them is scum. More shall come when the time is right!

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 20:58 GMT

#1070

On January 17 2013 05:27 Hapahauli wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yes I did. However that's only one game out of the multitude of his recent town games in which he played very aggressively.

In addition, I can't rationalize his stance on iamp from a town perspective:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=392955&currentpage=52#1022

Votes Ruuch, afks for the entire night cycle, comes back and says he thinks iamperfection is town for no reasoning, then proceeds to make arguments against me based on the "assumption" of iamp being town.

Furthermore, he stated that he didn't understand my reasoning for voting Ruuch, which is incredibly scummy considering that he voted Ruuch himself.

Meeeh, I really think Hopeless should be defending himself, but since he seem to suck at that... I feel like alot of your points, maybe even all of them, could be explained by the fact that Hopeless is bad. And do you see any scum motivation in scum motivation in saying that a player is suspicious for voting the same person that you are voting yourself? This just seems retarded as both alignments. Also, Hopeless feels like he bases alot of his reads on OMGUS(whoever votes him, he votes etc)

Also, I don't exactly see that he went from vote ruush to Iamp is town without explaination as scummy. ruush was a policy lynch and nothing else, and Iamp is clearly looking better than ruush to say the least.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 21:09 GMT

#1071

On January 17 2013 05:45 jaybrundage wrote:
@Hapa Do you think we have a scum between Sloosh and WBG. If so who and also why would they both be voting Hopeless?

Read his filter and you shall find the answer!

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 22:04 GMT

#1078

On January 17 2013 06:54 grush57 wrote:
Nvm Ill go slooshie
##Unvote
##Vote: slOosh

Lol grush...

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 16 2013 22:45 GMT

#1082

I actually think Jay has a decent point here. Looking through SlOosh filter, I'm having a hard time seeing them both as scum. SlOosh is just throwing random doubt at hopeless for no actual reason making him look worse. And its even more strange considering that some people(SS for example) had a town read on Hopeless, so he wouldn't look bad at all really, posting a town read or even just ignoring him D1.

I find this even more interesting given how many players in this game that seems to have Hopeless and SlOosh down as scum mates.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:38 GMT

#1142

Okay, I'm killing SlOosh tonight. WBGs post about the timestamps + how he avoided to vote is convincing enough for me to vote him.

##Vote: SlOosh

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:45 GMT

#1146

On January 18 2013 02:39 thrawn2112 wrote:

Show nested quote +

who do you think is scum, and who do you want to lynch? pretend the lynch is completely your choice and give me 2 candidates based on your own thoughts.

SlOosh.

I'm not too sure of the next two players as my main scum target died tonight...

However, I'm quite sure the two remaining scum are among

Hapa
grush
Xata
Jay
Iamp
MrZentor.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:47 GMT

#1148

Nope

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:49 GMT

#1150

On January 18 2013 02:47 thrawn2112 wrote:
##unvote
##Vote: Lazermonkey

Yhea, me not having more than one scum read at this point makes me scum. How?

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:53 GMT

#1154

On January 18 2013 02:50 thrawn2112 wrote:

Show nested quote +

to add to this, looking at your filter from n1 it looks like you were most suspicious of wbg

Lazermonkey

-sheeps wbg
-has no scumread beside his sheep vote
-sheeped the person he was most suspicious of

/Facepalm

How does me sheeping SS make me scum, Lol? He is one of the two players in the game who is in fact confirmed town. And I didn't vote SlOosh for the reasons that SS thought made SlOosh scum. I'm purely sheeping WBG.

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:55 GMT

#1156

On January 18 2013 02:51 thrawn2112 wrote:

Show nested quote +

if you do not understand this, you are all the more scummy for it

town are inherently suspicious of people. you aren't.

ASDSFSDADSDASdAFSDADFSDASAFSASDAFA...

Lazermonkey

Sweden2176 Posts

January 17 2013 17:57 GMT

#1158