EPTAnd he is periodically writing random shit so conf lurking not afk
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXV - Page 18
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
bringaniga
18 Posts
And he is periodically writing random shit so conf lurking not afk | ||
|
Mandalor
Germany2362 Posts
On January 14 2013 05:24 Trotske wrote: How do you feel about sn0_man and my case for him. I'm kind of indifferent about him. tbh when I read the last mafia games, I also felt weird about Mocsta's play. He likes to ask lots of questions, which is good (don't get me wrong), but that's pretty much all he did in XXXIII for quite a while and I feel like that's a decent way to get to a lot of posts without giving any reads. Still, it's stupid to attack Mocsta like that this early in the game, but I feel like that would be a really ballsy thing to do as scum that early. It might be a good move tho to try to discredit one of the leading figures of the last games early on. So yeah idk. I need more posts of him and I want him to write down his reads so far. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
bringaniga
18 Posts
| ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
| ||
|
bringaniga
18 Posts
he may want to modkill me or replace me or let me stay. I don't know. But let me clarify I did not use this smurf to gain an unfair advantage. my main account is not in the obs qt. | ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
bringaniga lets assume you are not going to get modkilled please tell me why you like laguerta more than sn0_man. | ||
|
laguerta
22 Posts
| ||
|
Mandalor
Germany2362 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6593 Posts
I'm not happy at all about Laguerta's post count or quality of posts but I think Shz is a candidate for a lynch over Laguerta at the moment. Albeit it's very close for me between the two of them. Shz has voted for Bringaniga because he was annoying, not because he was scum. In my mind this is not a town motivated vote. It is a vote on somebody easy to target by scum. He hasn't contributed to very much at all, and instead has either asked very simplistic questions, answered the first few questions but mostly attacked players on their stances early on and hasn't done anything since then. It is a large change from my game with him in XXXIII and the fact that he has not contributed since then also makes me worried. I believe you are taking the easy way out by voting for Bringaniga, voting for one of the "easy" lynch candidates. Town should be scum hunting and trying to discuss leads with each other. Not voting because somebody is annoying who you yourself even said it is unlikely for him to be scum. ##Vote: Shz | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6593 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Mandalor
Germany2362 Posts
##Vote: laguerta Explain your vote. Now. | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Torn if I should change my vote, but Laguerta might still say something and I'm off to bed now. Sticking with my vote on sn0_man since he is a good candidate. | ||
|
laguerta
22 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6593 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
I have had a change in heart. ##UNVOTE:Sn0_Man ##Vote: Mandalor This guy is spouting so much crap its not funny. + Show Spoiler + On January 14 2013 05:33 Mandalor wrote: I also felt weird about Mocsta's play. He likes to ask lots of questions, which is good (don't get me wrong), but that's pretty much all he did in XXXIII for quite a while I need more posts of him and I want him to write down his reads so far. I have given my reads in spades.. he doubts my contributions, but look at his half-attempts as I list below. (My reads are via the qusetions I choose to pressure with) and the cases I choose to make. I do not put my vote lightly ever. On January 14 2013 00:14 Mandalor wrote: I advocate going for the easy targets first. We might have a really good scum player in the game, but most of them will show characteristic scum traits and I feel like that's what we should focus on for now. On January 14 2013 00:50 Mandalor wrote: Easy targets are more likely to flip scum. Everybody, except Sylencia, last game showed those traits. There is no reason for me to think that all scum players in this game are geniusses. This is all rubbish... this game has approximately 6 or 7 lurkers... that means if all 3 mafia are there... you have 3/7 chance to lynch mafia, and 4/7 chance to lynch scum.... if 6 players is 50/50.. why take this risk (unless you dont care because your two listed are town!) On January 14 2013 01:10 Mandalor wrote: But I'm thinking town is going to lynch Trotske or laguerta? Noone ever mentioned any suspicions on them except for me afaik. ] So because you raise 2 lurkers.. town should lynch them.. What type of thought process is this.. SCum hunting is more than picking 2 names out of a hat.. you need to question them.. Try and prove them innocent (there is a higher likelihood any player is town).. if the act funny.. push them harder (like I am about to do to you) On January 14 2013 05:12 Mandalor wrote: So, basically apart from trolling, you want to lynch a lurker which gives us 0 information. I'm not a huge fan of lynching annoying people to get rid of them, but you make a damn good case for it. ##Vote: bringaniga Shape up and I'll change my vote. Finishes by Giving up on his 2 reads he pushed so far and joining the bandwagon.. what type of serious town play is this . it reads all to me as a guy who doesnt care who the vote goes on.
Yes I voted for Sn0_Man.. and I still don't like him... but... I thought as town we were meant to vote not for a lurker.. [b]but for our best scum read. Can you tell me that the points im making are confirmation biased? Can you tell me that the points Im making do not suggest scum motivations? Any town player can make his points.. but.. why would they? Hes trying to looking like contributing.. but is he rerally contributing Mocsta wrote: ##Vote: Mandalor | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6593 Posts
@Laguerta why should we NOT vote to lynch you in 2 hours? | ||
|
laguerta
22 Posts
| ||
| ||
