EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXIV - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6598 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Night 1 Minimalistic Edition "Hi", said jampidampi. "You do not talk enough for my likes", answered OmniEuology. "Woobergoose!", yelled TeMiL. Alas, there could only be one logical solution. Since less shall be more, and more is always less, the sum of all that is, was and shall be is always nothing, but not emptiness. Just nothing. The lack of anything, even the lack of anything BUT the lack of anything. StriX, the Vanilla Townie thought about one too many planes of logic for his good! It is now Night 1. Please submit your nightactions per PM to ALL your hosts. Night will last 23 hours, so we can get back to the 00:00 GMT (+00:00) deadline we shall follow henceforth. Flavor is just flavor. | ||
|
Rad
United States935 Posts
 | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6598 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9645 Posts
| ||
|
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6598 Posts
On January 05 2013 10:10 zarepath wrote: Now if there'd been a case against Omni four hours earlier, we could've had a different result. Welp, time to read the filters again! result wouldn't have changed. same guy would be lynched regardless. | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On January 05 2013 10:11 OmniEulogy wrote: result wouldn't have changed. same guy would be lynched regardless. Not necessarily, Cora and I might have changed if there was time given for that case to be properly analysed. | ||
|
Spaghetticus
Australia451 Posts
Now that StiX is gone, you are the person who has had the most suspicion of them expressed with a vote. You are so far from bullet-proof it blows my mind that you would act this way. | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6598 Posts
On January 05 2013 10:15 Sylencia wrote: Not necessarily, Cora and I might have changed if there was time given for that case to be properly analysed. why Cora specifically? | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
Because he stated it himself. | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6598 Posts
On January 05 2013 10:16 Spaghetticus wrote: You are overconfident Omni. Now that StiX is gone, you are the person who has had the most suspicion of them expressed with a vote. You are so far from bullet-proof it blows my mind that you would act this way. prior to the vote 0% chance unless scum was waiting to switch from StriX to myself. Which would make no sense it would give them away entirely. Now I agree after the vote. But before... nah. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
I feel like Moc put up some great points, but it was way too close to the deadline to fairly analyze it. However, I am going to and come back with my feelings on it. Had Mocsta decided to post it 4 hours ago, I might have voted for you. | ||
|
OmniEulogy
Canada6598 Posts
he stated mocsta didn't give me enough time to defend myself. thats far from what you are implying. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On January 05 2013 09:20 cDgCorazon wrote: Right now, I'm going with StriX. OE's case against StriX has some very good points, and I think that we should reserve judgement on OE until we see what happens with StriX. Moc, Syl has a very excellent point. If you are not willing to follow your own advice to others, how am I supposed to take you seriously? OE gave StriX time to defend. However, you have not. It's not very fair, so I believe I am going to examine this case post-lynch, and StriX's flip will have a huge impact on my read of OE ##Unvote ##Vote: StriX This is the long version of what I said. | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On January 05 2013 10:19 OmniEulogy wrote: he stated mocsta didn't give me enough time to defend myself. thats far from what you are implying. And depending on your defense, Cora might have switched if it was posted earlier. I do not see this to be any different to what I said, seeing as how I didn't say Cora and I would definitely change votes. In any case, why are we arguing over this? This is not what we should be concentrating on. | ||
| ||
