[T] MTG Mini Mafia II - Page 15
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
| ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
/G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
......well...I guess he did claim stupid perhaps | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
| ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
He's an OatsMaster Clearly he knows about oats, we should sheep him Also Oats what you said there made no sense. I guess I'll ignore it then /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Gon and I were talking, we wanted us/CH to be the last to input actions so that the scum can't change their action after us, outright claim in thread and just keep pumping Xfire/2scum's health trying to survive while mafia beast kills all of us. Also, in post game I want to hear from Xfire what the hell he was thinking of doing if he rolled town, I've been going over and over that in my mind and cannot figure it out. Are we just waiting on SnB to confirm that playing fertile growth doesn't ruin them or should we let marv play the card and just go for it now? p | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
| ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
##(New Frontiers) Search for: Mountain Mountain Did we get the KP to kill Xfire? /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Yeah, I assumed you were thinking the same thing. I guess we'll play our sorceries first, GreyGrok can copy them. I'd like Rock to destroy the blockers right now though if its all the same to you Hope could you jump in there and do that? Thanks. After that we start pounding away I guess. So I played a mountian, not sure which lands we want from Bin's Frontier thing, I'm waiting to hear back from the big G. He will also be the one to play our Chain Lightning cards, I told him I'm totally down to do it as soon as he is. Just haven't heard back from him yet, expect those up soon though. I'm out for a bit now. Good hunting! p | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
On February 01 2013 11:33 Aperture Science wrote: None of you are going to give a shit about this, so go ahead and skip it. I don't have the patience to spam the same point 10 times to get it across, and if I don't then you'll just ignore anything I say (or somehow make it seem scummy). I've been working 12 hour shifts the last 3 days. Its tax season and everything was due today. If I'd known in advance, I wouldn't have signed up - I got this job a week ago. So yeah, I haven't been as active as I would have liked. I've been trying though, and doing what I can. You guys are so ridiculous. You claim to hunt based on meta, and then completely ignore mine. I always troll the first 24 hours if not more. I always respond poorly to pressure. And I always do a focused analysis of someone. I'm not good at pressuring, although for most of you that's all you are good at. After reading through today's stupid shit, and "randomly" discarding the only two cards in my hand of any value, I'm finding it very difficult to give a shit at all. In case it wasn't obvious, I'm running storm. But its a really weird Storm variant, and I literally can't do anything without the proper cards in my hand. And now I don't have them. Fuck me, right? Cross is scum. Thats pretty obvious. I feel like he doesn't have a very good deck at all, but he claimed scum so... yeah. Bin still feels off. Oats' shit just feels bad, and MG isn't playing like I know he can in a mason circle (which is what a Hydra is). MG in a Mason Circle always makes sure that his fellows know exactly what he is thinking, and makes sure they agree on everything. Check Aperture Mafia: LINK HERE, CLICK IT. Those are my picks, and what I've been up to. I'm extremely tired, a big part of which is that I'm physically exhausted. I'm sorry if I get snappy. I don't have any thoughts on the math behind combat, and I can't do anything with this ridiculous, BULLSHIT hand. 4 things: 3) Do you know what happened to the guy who claimed he was "so busy" with IRL stuff? Yeah he just claimed scum 2) Even if your "excuse" is legit, activity doesn't have to do much with anything. You were active for lots of parts just making random fluff comments about "focusing on hydras" and "guys! Xfire isn't scum! His card doesn't make him scum!". Oh lol now that Xfire is scum that last point looks even worse lol 3) I will continue thinking you are the remaining scum until you address every point of my super uber case against you. "I respond badly to pressure" is not enough, specially when "respond badly" means "make a rage post and analysis" and you don't do anything else at all when not pressured 4) Please destroy Xfire's Goblin with your Fire something card (unless people want Rock to do so?) ..5) Well...at least is good you are casting 3 damage to Xfire I guess...? /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
As in, he should post "I am here, I'm ready to cast that thingy", and as soon as he posts that, I cast CL. There's no way he can AFK after that. I won't AFK either, unless an alien abducts me or some shit So, I didn't understand the Suck thing with Nova's card shit, can someone explain how ALL damage on Xfire will be dealt? /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Okay, I'm ready to cast CL as per described above. Also, didn't I play a mountiain earlier? Prome played a mountain as well...but we have 1 less mountain? Or am I crazy? /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
If he hadn't claimed scum, this turn would have been spent arguing about who to kill between Xfire/Aperture, and maybe some people attacking Suck or some shit. This is going as clean as possible ending with a surefire scum kill, so thanks Xfire! /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
##Tap Mountain: Cast Chain Lightning on Crossfire ##Tap Mountain: Cast Chain Lightning on Crossfire ##Tap Badlands for 1 red mana: Cast Chain Lightning on Crossfire /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Should be at 15 I assume | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
....so, do we destroy both of them? Aperture, you can sack your Braid of Fire to destroy his Shaman, and Rock can sack a Walker to destroy his Goblin. He can't do anything else if we do that right? /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
That means quickly, he might even still be actively lurking right now /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
Or was it the "destroy" part and not the "sac" part? /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
We still get 2 lands because of Bins card, so it's not that much of a waste /G | ||
(DontFear)ThePoster
Guernsey584 Posts
We need this figured out ASAP On February 01 2013 09:49 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Errata change on the board card: From destroy target permanent to destroy target nonland permanent. Does this mean one can sack a land to destroy a non-land permanent then? /G | ||
| ||